ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT07013240

Botulinum Toxin Injection After Sternotomies to Improve Scar Aspect and Impact

NCT07013240, Phase 3, Not yet recruiting, University Hospital, Bordeaux

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Botulinum Toxin Injection After Sternotomies to Improve Scar Aspect and Impact. Trials, record NCT07013240. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT07013240

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Botulinum Toxin Injection After Sternotomies to Improve Scar Aspect and Impact
NCT number
NCT07013240
Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
50 participants, estimated
Lead sponsor
University Hospital, Bordeaux
Conditions
Sternotomy Closure,Open Heart Surgery
Interventions
Botulinum toxin injection
First posted
2025-06-10
Last updated
2025-06-10

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes7

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryEvaluation of Stony Brooke Scar Scale scoreMonth 6
The Stony Brook Scar Evaluation Scale (SBSES) was developed by Singer et al. in 2007. It is based on five scar indicators: width, elevation or depression, color, suture or staple marks, and overall appearance.Each indicator is assigned a score between 0 and 5 points. These scores are totaled to obtain the final score between 0 and 5 points. This score will be determined for each half of scar (superior part and inferior part).
SecondaryMeasure of scar width in millimetersMonth 3, month 6, month 12 and month 18
SecondaryEvaluation of scar with POSAS : observer scaleMonth 3, month 6, month 12 and month 18
The observer's POSAS scale comprises six parameters (vascularity, pigmentation, thickness, relief, elasticity and surface). Each parameter is rated on a scale from 1 ("normal skin") to 10 ("worst scar imaginable"). The sum of the six parameters constitutes the observer's total POSAS score scale . In addition, a general opinion is scored from 1 to 10. All parameters should preferably be compared to normal skin on a comparable a comparable anatomical region. This scale will be determined for each half of scar (superior part and inferior part).
SecondaryEvaluation of scar with The Physician's Global Assesment (PGA)Month 3, Month 6, Month 12 and Month 18
The Physician's Global Assesment (PGA) evaluates the scar based on whether it is considered an Invisible scar ; a Scar as fine as a pencil line, of a color similar to the adjacent skin ; a Visible scar, little infiltrated or flat, discreetly colored ; a Widened and infiltrated scar, visible suture lines, of a color contrasting with the skin ; a Hypertrophic scar, raised, hypervascularized or very hyperpigmented ; a Keloid. This evaluation will be determined for each half of scar (superior part and inferior part).
SecondaryEvaluation of Stony Brooke Scar Scale scoreMonth 3, Month 12 and Month 18
The Stony Brook Scar Evaluation Scale (SBSES) was developed by Singer et al. in 2007. It is based on five scar indicators: width, elevation or depression, color, suture or staple marks, and overall appearance. Each indicator is assigned a score between 0 and 1 point. These scores are totaled to obtain the final score between 0 and 5 points. This scale will be determined for each half of scar (superior part and inferior part).
SecondaryEvaluation of scar with POSAS : Patient scaleMonth 3, Month 6, Month 12 and Month 18
The patient's POSAS scale comprises six parameters (pain, itching, color, stiffness, thickness and irregularity). Each parameter is rated on a scale from 1 ("normal skin") to 10 ("worst scar imaginable"). In addition, a general opinion is scored from 1 to 10. The sum of all these parameters constitutes the patient's total POSAS score scale. All parameters should preferably be compared to normal skin on a comparable a comparable anatomical region. This evaluation will be determined for each half of scar (superior part and inferior part).
SecondarySatisfaction numerical scaleMonth 3, Month 6, Month 12 and Month 18Scar satisfaction is rated on a scale from 0 ("not at all satisfied") to 10 ("extremely satisfied"). This scale will be determined for each half of scar (superior part and inferior part).

Outcomes0

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

None in this release.

Results by group0

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

None in this release.

Participant flow0

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

None in this release.

Adverse events0

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

None in this release.

Adverse event totals0

The totals the trial posted for each group.

None in this release.

Papers1

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed as
18090752BACKGROUND

Source PubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT07013240

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT07013240/registered