Trial · NCT07073209
PENG vs Femoral Block for Hip Fracture Analgesia
NCT07073209, Not applicable, Recruiting, Weill Medical College of Cornell University
3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0
Cite this record
ConductScience Library. PENG vs Femoral Block for Hip Fracture Analgesia. Trials, record NCT07073209. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT07073209
On this page
Trial
As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.
- Title
- PENG vs Femoral Block for Hip Fracture Analgesia
- NCT number
- NCT07073209
- Status
- Recruiting
- Phases
- Not applicable
- Enrollment
- 352 participants, estimated
- Lead sponsor
- Weill Medical College of Cornell University
- Conditions
- Hip Fractures
- Interventions
- PENG Block Administration, Femoral Block Administration, Bupivacaine , epinephrine Dexamethasone
- First posted
- 2025-07-18
- Last updated
- 2026-05-15
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Registered outcomes9
Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.
| List | Outcome | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Mean Change in Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Pain Score One Hour Post Block for all Subjects | Baseline, 1-hour post block | The Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) measures the intensity of pain a subject experiences. where subjects rate their pain on a scale from zero to ten and each number corresponds to a different level of intensity. The lowest score 0 represents no pain and the highest score 10 represents the most intense feeling of pain. |
| Primary | Mean Change in Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Pain Score One-Hour Post Block in Intracapsular Hip Fractures | Baseline, 1-hour post block | The Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) measures the intensity of pain a subject experiences. where subjects rate their pain on a scale from zero to ten and each number corresponds to a different level of intensity. The lowest score 0 represents no pain and the highest score 10 represents the most intense feeling of pain. |
| Primary | Mean Change in Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Pain Score One-Hour Post Block in Extracapsular Hip Fractures | Baseline, 1-hour post block | The Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) measures the intensity of pain a subject experiences. where subjects rate their pain on a scale from zero to ten and each number corresponds to a different level of intensity. The lowest score 0 represents no pain and the highest score 10 represents the most intense feeling of pain. |
| Secondary | Mean NRS Pain Scores up to 24 Hours Post-block for all Subjects | 0-24 hours post block | The Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) measures the intensity of pain a subject experiences. where subjects rate their pain on a scale from zero to ten and each number corresponds to a different level of intensity. The lowest score 0 represents no pain and the highest score 10 represents the most intense feeling of pain. |
| Secondary | Mean NRS Pain Scores up to 24 Hours Post-block in Intracapsular Hip Fractures | 0-24 hours post block | The Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) measures the intensity of pain a subject experiences. where subjects rate their pain on a scale from zero to ten and each number corresponds to a different level of intensity. The lowest score 0 represents no pain and the highest score 10 represents the most intense feeling of pain. |
| Secondary | Mean NRS Pain Scores up to 24 Hours Post-block in Extracapsular Hip Fractures | 0-24 hours post block | The Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) measures the intensity of pain a subject experiences. where subjects rate their pain on a scale from zero to ten and each number corresponds to a different level of intensity. The lowest score 0 represents no pain and the highest score 10 represents the most intense feeling of pain. |
| Secondary | Number of Oral Morphine Equivalents Administered for all Subjects | 0-24 hours post block | Milligrams of oral morphine equivalent opioid consumption up to 24 hours post-block. Non-morphine opioids will be converted to an equivalent morphine dosage in milligrams for comparison across both block types. Oral morphine equivalent dosages are calculated using: Wen RY et al. A Comparison of Institutional Opioid Equianalgesia Tools: A National Study. J Palliat Med. 2022;25:1686 |
| Secondary | Number of Oral Morphine Equivalents Administered in Intracapsular Hip Fractures | 0-24 hours post block | Milligrams of oral morphine equivalent opioid consumption up to 24 hours post-block. Non-morphine opioids will be converted to an equivalent morphine dosage in milligrams for comparison across both block types. Oral morphine equivalent dosages are calculated using: Wen RY et al. A Comparison of Institutional Opioid Equianalgesia Tools: A National Study. J Palliat Med. 2022;25:1686 |
| Secondary | Number of Oral Morphine Equivalents Administered in Extracapsular Hip Fractures | 0-24 hours post block | Milligrams of oral morphine equivalent opioid consumption up to 24 hours post-block. Non-morphine opioids will be converted to an equivalent morphine dosage in milligrams for comparison across both block types. Oral morphine equivalent dosages are calculated using: Wen RY et al. A Comparison of Institutional Opioid Equianalgesia Tools: A National Study. J Palliat Med. 2022;25:1686 |
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Outcomes0
Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.
None in this release.
Results by group0
Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.
None in this release.
Participant flow0
How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.
None in this release.
Adverse events0
Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.
None in this release.
Adverse event totals0
The totals the trial posted for each group.
None in this release.
Papers13
The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.
Grants0
The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.
None in this release.
Trial comparisons0
Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.
None in this release.
Tests0
The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.
None in this release.
Data dates
The day each source was copied for this release.
Sources 3
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
- ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
- NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
- ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
- NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)
ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.
For software
Read this trial from software.
The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.
GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT07073209
GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT07073209/registered