ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT07096830

Efficacy of Tetrachlorodecaoxide (TCDO) Drops in Chronic Wound Healing

NCT07096830, Not applicable, Not yet recruiting, Fazeelat Bibi

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Efficacy of Tetrachlorodecaoxide (TCDO) Drops in Chronic Wound Healing. Trials, record NCT07096830. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT07096830

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Efficacy of Tetrachlorodecaoxide (TCDO) Drops in Chronic Wound Healing
NCT number
NCT07096830
Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Not applicable
Enrollment
66 participants, estimated
Lead sponsor
Fazeelat Bibi
Conditions
Chronic Wound Care
Interventions
Topical Tetrachlorodecaoxide (TCDO/Oxoferin), Standard Wound Care
First posted
2025-07-31
Last updated
2025-08-05

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes6

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryChange in wound area (cm²)Baseline to 4 weeks
Wound area will be measured weekly using the simple ruler method by multiplying the longest length and the widest perpendicular width with a sterile ruler. The change in wound size from baseline to 4 weeks will be used to assess healing progress. A decrease in wound area will indicate improvement.
SecondaryTime to 50% wound closureBaseline to 12 weeks
Time (in days) required to achieve 50% reduction in wound area from the baseline measurement. Wound size will be assessed using the simple ruler method by multiplying the longest length and the widest perpendicular width. This outcome serves as an early indicator of treatment efficacy.
SecondaryChange in pain score (Visual Analog Scale, VAS)Baseline to 12 weeks
Change in wound-related pain intensity assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates the worst possible pain. Pain scores will be recorded at baseline and during follow-up visits to evaluate change in pain score over time.
SecondaryIncidence of wound infectionBaseline to 12 weeks
Incidence of clinical wound infection, determined by the presence of local signs of inflammation (e.g., redness, swelling, warmth), purulent discharge, or the need for antibiotic therapy as judged by the treating clinician.
SecondaryCost-Effectiveness of TCDO TreatmentBase line to 12 weeks
Total treatment cost per patient will be compared between the intervention and control groups. Costs will include expenses related to wound dressings, hospital visits, medications, and other wound management components. This analysis will help determine the economic feasibility of using TCDO in resource-limited settings.
SecondaryChange in wound-related quality of life (Wound-QoL) scoreBase line to 12 weeks
The impact of chronic wounds on patients' quality of life will be assessed using the validated Wound-Related Quality of Life (Wound-QoL) questionnaire. The Wound-QoL consists of 17 items, each scored from 0 to 4, resulting in a total score ranging from 0 (no impairment) to 68 (maximum impairment). Higher scores indicate worse quality of life. Scores will be measured at baseline and follow-up visits, and changes over time will be analyzed.

Outcomes0

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

None in this release.

Results by group0

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

None in this release.

Participant flow0

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

None in this release.

Adverse events0

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

None in this release.

Adverse event totals0

The totals the trial posted for each group.

None in this release.

Papers1

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed as
27689045BACKGROUND

Source PubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT07096830

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT07096830/registered