Trial · NCT07097922
Compare the Clinical Efficacy of 3% Diquafosol and 0.1% Hyaluronic Acid in Patients With Dry Eye After LASIK
NCT07097922, Not applicable, Not yet recruiting, He Eye Hospital
3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0
Cite this record
ConductScience Library. Compare the Clinical Efficacy of 3% Diquafosol and 0.1% Hyaluronic Acid in Patients With Dry Eye After LASIK. Trials, record NCT07097922. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT07097922
On this page
Trial
As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.
- Title
- Compare the Clinical Efficacy of 3% Diquafosol and 0.1% Hyaluronic Acid in Patients With Dry Eye After LASIK
- NCT number
- NCT07097922
- Status
- Not yet recruiting
- Phases
- Not applicable
- Enrollment
- 140 participants, estimated
- Lead sponsor
- He Eye Hospital
- Conditions
- Dry Eye
- Interventions
- 3% Diquafosol Sodium Eye Drops, 0.1% hyaluronic acid
- First posted
- 2025-08-01
- Last updated
- 2025-08-01
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Registered outcomes10
Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.
| List | Outcome | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Non-invasive tear break-up time (NITBUT) | Baseline, week 4, week 12 and week 24 | The Keratograph 5M (Oculus, Germany) topographer will assess non-invasive tear breakup time. Three sequential readings will be captured, and the median value will be included in the final analysis. The median value will be recorded |
| Secondary | Conjunctivocorneal staining (CS) | Baseline, week 4, week 12 and week 24 | Fluorescein and lissamine staining of the ocular surface will be divided into three zones comprising nasal conjunctival, corneal, and temporal conjunctival areas. The staining score ranged from 0 to 3 for each zone, yielding a total score of 0-9 for the ocular surface |
| Secondary | Tear film lipid layer (TFLL) score | Baseline, week 4, week 12 and week 24 | Tear film lipid layer interferometry will be assessed using DR-1 (Kowa, Nagoya, Japan). The results will be graded as follows: grade 1, somewhat gray color, uniform distribution; grade 2, somewhat gray color, nonuniform distribution; grade 3, a few colors, nonuniform distribution; grade 4, many colors, nonuniform distribution; grade 5, corneal surface partially exposed |
| Secondary | Corneal Sensitivity Score | Baseline, week 4, week 12 and week 24 | Corneal sensitivity score measured with a Cochet-Bonnet esthesiometer (in mm filament length); the measurements will be done 3 times at every assessment session, and the median value will be recorded. |
| Secondary | Tear meniscus height (TMH) | Baseline, week 4, week 12 and week 24 | Tear meniscus height using the Keratograph 5M (Oculus, Germany) topographer will be measured three times consecutively, and the median value will be recorded. |
| Secondary | Conjunctival hyperemia (RS score) | Baseline, week 4, week 12 and week 24 | Conjunctival hyperemia (RS score) will be assessed by a keratograph image (Oculus, Germany) of 1156 × 873 pixels, with a redness score (RS) ranging from 0.0 (normal) to 4.0 (severe). |
| Secondary | Meibomian quality | Baseline, week 4, week 12 and week 24 | Meibomian quality will be assessed under a slit-lamp; eight meibomian glands in the middle parts of the eyelid will be assessed using a scale of 0 to 3 for each gland (0 represented clear meibum; 1 represented cloudy meibum; 2 represented cloudy and granular meibum; and 3 represented thick, toothpaste-like consistency meibum). |
| Secondary | Meibomian gland expressibility | Baseline, week 4, week 12 and week 24 | Meibomian gland expression: five meibomian glands in the middle part were evaluated on a scale of 0-3: 0, all glandsexpressible; 1, 3-4 glands expressible; 2, 1-2 glands expressible; and 3, no glands expressible |
| Secondary | Corneal nerves and immune/inflammatory cell change | Baseline, week 4, week 12 and week 24 | HRT III RCM (Heidelberg Engineering GmbH, Germany) will be used to record corneal nerves and immune/ inflammatory cell change. It can accurately scan the cornea from the upper cortex to the inner cortex and other different depth levels and accurately judge the specific level and scope of the lesion. Three representative images of the subbasal nerve plexus and epithelial DCs will be selected for analysis for each eye, considering criteria such as a whole image in the same layer, best focus, and good contrast. |
| Secondary | OSDI | Baseline, week 4, week 12 and week 24 | The Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) is a tool used to assess the degree to which ocular surface disease affects a patient's visual function and related symptoms. It is a subjective, patient-self-reported questionnaire.The questionnaire mainly covers three functions, and eye irritation symptoms. There are usually 12 questions, and the answer options for each question usually include "none," "mild," "moderate," and "severe," and the corresponding scores are 0, 1, 2, and 3. A range of 0-12 is classified as normal or mild symptoms. A range of 13-22 is classified as moderate symptoms. 23-36 is classified as severe symptoms. |
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Outcomes0
Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.
None in this release.
Results by group0
Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.
None in this release.
Participant flow0
How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.
None in this release.
Adverse events0
Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.
None in this release.
Adverse event totals0
The totals the trial posted for each group.
None in this release.
Papers0
The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.
None in this release.
Grants0
The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.
None in this release.
Trial comparisons0
Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.
None in this release.
Tests0
The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.
None in this release.
Data dates
The day each source was copied for this release.
Sources 3
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
- ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
- NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
- ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
- NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)
ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.
For software
Read this trial from software.
The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.
GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT07097922
GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT07097922/registered