ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT07200661

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation, Functional Activity, Stroke, RCT

NCT07200661, Not applicable, Completed, University of Phayao

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation, Functional Activity, Stroke, RCT. Trials, record NCT07200661. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT07200661

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation, Functional Activity, Stroke, RCT
NCT number
NCT07200661
Status
Completed
Phases
Not applicable
Enrollment
30 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
University of Phayao
Conditions
Ischemic Stroke, Hemorrhagic Stroke, Stroke, Cardiovascular
Interventions
Experimental A tDCS: Transcranial direct current stimulation., Experimental B tDCS: Transcranial direct current stimulation., Experimental C tDCS: Transcranial direct current stimulation.
First posted
2025-10-01
Last updated
2025-10-01

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes9

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryChange in Functional Mobility (TUG)4 week
Balance control was measured using the Timed up and go test (TUGT). The tester measured the time it took the volunteers to stand up from a chair, walk straight ahead for 3 meters, turn around a cone, and walk back to sit in the chair at maximum speed and safety for 3 times. The average time taken by the volunteers in seconds was then calculated.
PrimaryChange in Functional Mobility (10MWT)4 week
Walking speed: The time taken to walk a distance of 10 meters (10-meter walk test: 10MWT) at normal and maximum speeds was measured. The tester measured the time taken for the 4 meters in the middle of the entire walkway. The test was repeated 3 times/speed and the average of each speed was calculated in meters/second. The movement was analyzed using a 2D (high-speed) motion analysis program.
PrimaryChange in Functional Mobility ( 6MWT)4 week
Functional endurance was measured using a 6-minute walk test (6MinWT) in which subjects walked as far as possible around a rectangular walkway. During the test, subjects were allowed to stand and rest without interrupting the test time. At the end of the test, the tester measured the distance covered by the subjects.
PrimaryChange in Functional Mobility (FTSST)4 week
Functional muscle strength test of the leg muscles using the Five times sit-to-stand test (FTSST) as quickly and safely as possible without using hands. The test was repeated 3 times and the average was calculated.
PrimaryChange in Functional Mobility (BBS)4 week
Berg Balance Scale (BBS), a healthcare provider gives a person 14 tasks, such as sitting to standing, standing unsupported, and reaching for objects, scoring their performance from 0 (unable to complete) to 4 (normal). The total score out of 56 indicates functional balance, with higher scores showing better balance and lower scores suggesting a greater risk of falling. The assessment takes about 15-20 minutes and requires simple equipment like a chair, stopwatch, and step stool
PrimaryChange in Functional Mobility (Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA))4 week
The Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) assesses motor function, sensation, balance, joint range of motion, and joint pain, typically in stroke patients, using a standardized 3-point scale (0=cannot perform, 1=performs partially, 2=performs fully) for each item. An examiner observes the patient's ability to complete tasks and assigns scores for the upper extremity motor (66 points), lower extremity motor (34 points), sensation (24 points), balance (14 points), and joint pain and range of motion (44 points each). The final score, a number out of a possible 226, indicates the level of recovery, with higher scores signifying better functional ability
SecondaryChange in Cognitive Function (Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA))4 week
MoCA, an examiner guides a patient through 10 minutes of tasks testing various cognitive domains, including attention, executive function, memory, language, and orientation, by having them copy a cube, draw a clock, remember words, name animals, and identify similarities between objects. The test is scored out of 30 points, with a score of 26 or higher generally considered normal.
SecondaryChange in Cognitive Function (Stroop test)4 week
the Stroop Test, measure and compare the time and accuracy for reading color words, naming colors in a non-conflicting way, and naming the color of ink in which an incongruent color word is printed.Color-Word Task: This is the main task where participants name the ink color of a color word that is printed in an incongruent color (e.g., the word "RED" in blue ink. The administrator records the number of correct responses within a set time (e.g., 45 seconds) or the total time to complete a set number of items.
SecondaryChange in Cognitive Function (Digit Span)4 weekDigit Span, a participant is asked to repeat sequences of numbers either in the original order (forward) or in reverse order (backward), with the sequence length increasing for correct repetitions.

Outcomes0

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

None in this release.

Results by group0

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

None in this release.

Participant flow0

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

None in this release.

Adverse events0

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

None in this release.

Adverse event totals0

The totals the trial posted for each group.

None in this release.

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests2

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

TestNamed asSource
Digit Span TestSecondary outcomeConductCognition
Stroop Color-Word TestSecondary outcomeConductCognition

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT07200661

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT07200661/registered