ConductScience.org, home

Library / Trials

Immersive Virtual Reality vs Treadmill Exercise Project

NCT07213388, Not applicable, Completed, Rowan University

Trial 10

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

FieldValueSource
TitleImmersive Virtual Reality vs Treadmill Exercise ProjectClinicalTrials.gov
NCT numberNCT07213388ClinicalTrials.gov
StatusCompletedClinicalTrials.gov
PhasesNot applicableClinicalTrials.gov
Enrollment61 participants, actualClinicalTrials.gov
Lead sponsorRowan UniversityClinicalTrials.gov
ConditionsControl, Virtual Reality Physical Activity, TreadmillClinicalTrials.gov
InterventionsVRPA, Treadmill, ControlClinicalTrials.gov
First posted2025-10-08ClinicalTrials.gov
Last updated2026-01-16ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes 12

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescriptionSource
PrimaryPace of participant recruitmentUp to 24 monthsenrollment rate of 6 participants per monthClinicalTrials.gov
PrimaryNumber of participants willing to continue using the assigned exercie modalityDay 1Willingness to continue using the exercise modality to which the participants were assigned and self-report enjoyment from engaging in the assigned exercise.ClinicalTrials.gov
PrimaryPercentage of participants who complete the required tasks in each conditionDay 1Are participants able to complete the required tasksClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryChanges in Heart RateDay 1Differences in heart rate from pre- to post sessionClinicalTrials.gov
SecondarySelf-reported measures of "flow" associated with the assigned conditionsDay 1
Flow will be assessed using the Flow Short Scale (Rheinberg et al, 2003) that is comprised of 13 questions answered on a 7-point scale (1 = Not at all, 7 = very much). Scores can range from 13-91, with lower scores indicating less of a "flow state" or feelings of immersion in the assigned activity.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryChanges in affectDay 1
Using the Activation-Deactivation Checklist (Thayer et al., 1986), participants will rate 20 different adjectives on a 4-point scale (1= definitely feel, 2= feel slightly, 3= cannot decide, 4= definitely do not feel) before they engage in the assigned activity and after they engage in the assigned activity. Lower numbers will indicate higher endorsements of a particular feeling, but the primary outcome will examine any changes in pre- to post-activity ratings of the different affective states.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryRate of percieved exertionDay 1
Borg's Rate of Perceived Exertion will be used to measure how participants rate their perceived exertion on a scale of 6 (no exertion at all) to 20 (maximal exertion) (Borg, 1982). The scale is anchored to the participant's subjective perception, with descriptors such as "extremely hard." Rate of perceived exertion will be evaluated post-activity only and will be compared across groups.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryChanges in Stroop Color and Word TestDay 1
The Stroop Color and Word Test (Golden et al, 2002) will be conducted pre- and post-assigned activities. Raw scores (e.g., reaction times, errors) will be calculated and changes in those scores from pre- to post-activity will be determined.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryNumber of Calories BurnedDay 1Total number of calories burned during the assigned conditionClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryNumber of Active MinutesDay 1Total number of active minutes during the assigned conditionClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryChanges in Executive FunctioningDay 1
The Trail Making Test (TMT) will be used to calculate changes in executive function (Arbuthnott \& Frank, 2000; Kortte et al., 2002; Reitan, 1956). Participants will be required to draw lines connecting different scattered numbers (Part A) and scattered numbers and letters (Part B). If the test can not be completed in 5-minutes it will be stopped. The more errors a person makes, and the longer a person takes, indicate poorer outcomes for executive function and changes in this measure will be calculated from pre- to post-activity.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryChanges in Working Memory CapacityDay 1
The Backward Digits Span (BDT, Lamar et al., 2007) measures an individual's working memory capacity and is comprised of 21 trials where participants will need to recall 3, 4, and 5-digit spans. The more numbers a person can correctly recall the better their working memory. Changes in this measure, from pre- to post-activity, will be calculated
ClinicalTrials.gov

Outcomes 0

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured asSource

Results by group 0

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnitsSource

Participant flow 0

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits countedSource

Adverse events 0

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEventsSource

Adverse event totals 0

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt riskSource

Papers 0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource

Grants 0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

ProjectTitlePrincipal investigatorsOrganizationFunderFiscal yearsSource

Trial comparisons 0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource

Tests 4

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

TestNamed asSource
Digit Span TestSecondary outcomeConductCognition
Stroop Color-Word TestSecondary outcomeConductCognition
Trail Making Test ASecondary outcomeConductCognition
Trail Making Test BSecondary outcomeConductCognition

Source 5

FieldValueSource
Releasetrials-2026-11-12-0.4.0ClinicalTrials.gov
Release manifest SHA-2560f4a8d8c48aee2a7573ae0fa94ecbeab70c1adbe449bbc95c424bc7d3e97b9d4ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry capture2026-11-12ClinicalTrials.gov
Results copy, AACT2026-03-23ClinicalTrials.gov
NIH clinical studies file2026-11-13ClinicalTrials.gov

The same record as JSON

Release trials-2026-11-12-0.4.0

ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACT: ClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299 ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

ClinicalTrials.gov: none stated ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project files: Public domain (NIH RePORTER)