ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT07330648

Prospective Clinical Trial of Crisugabalin Capsules in the Treatment of Generalized Anxiety Disorder

NCT07330648, Phase 2, Recruiting, Anhui Medical University

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Prospective Clinical Trial of Crisugabalin Capsules in the Treatment of Generalized Anxiety Disorder. Trials, record NCT07330648. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT07330648

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Prospective Clinical Trial of Crisugabalin Capsules in the Treatment of Generalized Anxiety Disorder
NCT number
NCT07330648
Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 2
Enrollment
216 participants, estimated
Lead sponsor
Anhui Medical University
Conditions
Generalized Anxiety Disorder
Interventions
Crisugabalin 20mg bid, Venlafaxine-XR 75mg bid, Crisugabalin capsules mimic 0mg/capsule bid
First posted
2026-01-09
Last updated
2026-01-09

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes10

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryChange in Hamilton Anxiety (HAMA) scale score after 8 week treatmentfrom baseline to week 8
The Hamilton Anxiety (HAMA) scale score reflects the severity of the subjects anxiety symptoms. The primary efficacy end point was the change from baseline to week 8 in HAMA total score to determine the superiority of crisugabalin capsules over placebo. The larger the difference between crisugabalin capsules over placebo, the better the curative effect.The HAMA consists of 14 items that encompass both psychological and somatic symptoms of anxiety. Each item is scored on a scale of 0 (not present) to 4 (severe), with a total score range of 0-56, where \<17 indicates mild severity, 18-24 mild to moderate severity and 25-30 moderate to severe.
SecondaryChange in Hamilton anxiety scale score after treatmentfrom baseline to week 8
One of the secondary efficacy end point was the change from baseline to week 8 in Hamilton anxiety scale to determine the superiority of crisugabalin capsules over placebo. The larger the difference between crisugabalin capsules over placebo, the better the curative effect.The HAMA consists of 14 items that encompass both psychological and somatic symptoms of anxiety. Each item is scored on a scale of 0 (not present) to 4 (severe), with a total score range of 0-56, where \<17 indicates mild severity, 18-24 mild to moderate severity and 25-30 moderate to severe.
SecondaryChange in each factor score and item score of Hamilton anxiety scalefrom baseline to week 8
One of the secondary efficacy end point was the change from baseline to week 8 in each factor score and item score of Hamilton anxiety scale to determine the superiority of crisugabalin capsules over placebo. The larger the difference between crisugabalin capsules over placebo, the better the curative effect. The HAMA consists of 14 items that encompass both psychological and somatic symptoms of anxiety. Each item is scored on a scale of 0 (not present) to 4 (severe), with a total score range of 0-56, where \<17 indicates mild severity, 18-24 mild to moderate severity and 25-30 moderate to severe.
SecondaryClinical global impression of improvement scorethe end of week 4 and 8
Subjective improvement of crisugabalin capsules will be assessed using Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) score at week 4 and 8. The larger the difference between crisugabalin capsules over placebo, the better the curative effect. The CGI-I scale is used to measure the clinician's assessment of how much the participant's illness has improved or worsened relative to baseline. The CGI-I comprises one item with 7 possible ratings (1-7 points), where a lower score indicates improvement, and a higher score indicates worsening.
SecondaryClinical global impression of severity scorethe end of week 4 and 8
Subjective severity of crisugabalin capsules will be assessed by the change from baseline to week 4 and 8 with Clinical global impression of severity (CGI-S) score, to determine the superiority of crisugabalin capsules over placebo. The larger the difference between crisugabalin capsules over placebo, the better the curative effect. The CGI-S scale assesses the clinician's impression of the participant's current severity of illness relative to the clinician's experience with patients who have the same diagnosis. The CGI-S comprises one item with 7 possible ratings (1-7 points), where a higher score indicates more severe illness.
SecondaryComplete remission ratethe end of week 8
Complete remission rate was the proportion of subjects with HAMA total scale score ≤7 at the end of week 8. The larger the difference between crisugabalin capsules over placebo, the better the curative effect. The HAMA consists of 14 items that encompass both psychological and somatic symptoms of anxiety. Each item is scored on a scale of 0 (not present) to 4 (severe), with a total score range of 0-56, where \<17 indicates mild severity, 18-24 mild to moderate severity and 25-30 moderate to severe.
SecondaryResponse ratethe end of week 8
Response rate was the proportion of subjects with HAMA total score decreased by ≥50% from baseline to week 8. The larger the difference between crisugabalin capsules over placebo, the better the curative effect. The HAMA consists of 14 items that encompass both psychological and somatic symptoms of anxiety. Each item is scored on a scale of 0 (not present) to 4 (severe), with a total score range of 0-56, where \<17 indicates mild severity, 18-24 mild to moderate severity and 25-30 moderate to severe.
SecondaryRapid-onset ratethe end of week 1 and 2
Rapid-onset rate was the proportion of subjects with HAMA total score decreased by ≥20% from baseline to week 1 and 2. The larger the difference between crisugabalin capsules over placebo, the better the curative effect. The HAMA consists of 14 items that encompass both psychological and somatic symptoms of anxiety. Each item is scored on a scale of 0 (not present) to 4 (severe), with a total score range of 0-56, where \<17 indicates mild severity, 18-24 mild to moderate severity and 25-30 moderate to severe.
OtherExploratory AnalysisForm baseline to week 8
A descriptive statistical analysis will be performed to evaluate the change from baseline in HAMA total score for Venlafaxine-XR. The HAMA consists of 14 items that encompass both psychological and somatic symptoms of anxiety. Each item is scored on a scale of 0 (not present) to 4 (severe), with a total score range of 0-56, where \<17 indicates mild severity, 18-24 mild to moderate severity and 25-30 moderate to severe.
OtherAdverse events (AEs)Form baseline to week 8number and severity of AEs

Outcomes0

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

None in this release.

Results by group0

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

None in this release.

Participant flow0

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

None in this release.

Adverse events0

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

None in this release.

Adverse event totals0

The totals the trial posted for each group.

None in this release.

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT07330648

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT07330648/registered