ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT07421804

Evaluation of Topical Dutasteride as a Potential New Therapy for Facial Acne Vulgaris Versus the Triple Combination Therapy (Clindamycin Phosphate 1.2%, Benzoyl Peroxide 3.1%, and Adapalene 0.15% Gel)

NCT07421804, Not applicable, Not yet recruiting, Assiut University

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Evaluation of Topical Dutasteride as a Potential New Therapy for Facial Acne Vulgaris Versus the Triple Combination Therapy (Clindamycin Phosphate 1.2%, Benzoyl Peroxide 3.1%, and Adapalene 0.15% Gel). Trials, record NCT07421804. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT07421804

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Evaluation of Topical Dutasteride as a Potential New Therapy for Facial Acne Vulgaris Versus the Triple Combination Therapy (Clindamycin Phosphate 1.2%, Benzoyl Peroxide 3.1%, and Adapalene 0.15% Gel)
NCT number
NCT07421804
Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Not applicable
Enrollment
50 participants, estimated
Lead sponsor
Assiut University
Conditions
Acne Vulgaris
Interventions
topical dutasteride
First posted
2026-02-19
Last updated
2026-02-19

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes4

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
Primary
Evaluate and compare the therapeutic efficacy (clinical, microbiological & psychological) of topical Dutasteride 0.05% versus topical fixed-dose Clindamycin Phosphate 1.2%, Benzoyl Peroxide 3.1%, and Adapalene 0.15% gel in patients with facial AV
16 weekso Total lesions count (TLC) (inflammatory lesions and noninflammatory lesions)
Primary
Evaluate and compare the therapeutic efficacy (clinical, microbiological & psychological) of topical Dutasteride 0.05% versus topical fixed-dose Clindamycin Phosphate 1.2%, Benzoyl Peroxide 3.1%, and Adapalene 0.15% gel in patients with facial AV
12 weeks
o The investigator's global assessment (IGA) of acne severity grade modified to assess the half-face acne severity ; Treatment success will be defined as an Investigator's Global Assessment score of 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear), and a 2-grade or greater improvement from baseline at week 12.
SecondaryAddressing the safety profile of the two topical therapeutics12 weeksBy recording side effects by daily diary specifying side effect (whether systemic or topical ,type,site and onset )
SecondaryPsychological effect of AV and its relation to therapeutic outcomes12 weeksCardiff Acne Disability Index (CADI) will be assessed at first visit and at end of 12 week-study period

Outcomes0

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

None in this release.

Results by group0

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

None in this release.

Participant flow0

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

None in this release.

Adverse events0

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

None in this release.

Adverse event totals0

The totals the trial posted for each group.

None in this release.

Papers16

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
14988688BACKGROUNDPubMed
17635508BACKGROUNDPubMed
23905540BACKGROUNDPubMed
26689434BACKGROUNDPubMed
29083670BACKGROUNDPubMed
32478930BACKGROUNDPubMed
34674160BACKGROUNDPubMed
38192024BACKGROUNDPubMed
38300170BACKGROUNDPubMed
38791344BACKGROUNDPubMed

1 to 10 of 16

See all 16 papers

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT07421804

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT07421804/registered