ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT07453472

Comparison of Topical Photodynamic Therapy With Topical Calcipotriol in Management of Oral Leukoplakia

NCT07453472, Phase 3, Not yet recruiting, Dr. Shalini Gupta

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Comparison of Topical Photodynamic Therapy With Topical Calcipotriol in Management of Oral Leukoplakia. Trials, record NCT07453472. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT07453472

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Comparison of Topical Photodynamic Therapy With Topical Calcipotriol in Management of Oral Leukoplakia
NCT number
NCT07453472
Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
166 participants, estimated
Lead sponsor
Dr. Shalini Gupta
Conditions
Oral Leukoplakia
Interventions
Non-invasive Photo Dynamic Therapy using LED of wavelength ranging from 630-660nm( Fluence 15 J/cm2) as light source and 2.5% TB as photosensitizer, Topical application of Calcipotriol ointment 0.005% twice a day for 4 weeks along with preventive and conventional therapy, Conventional non-invasive management : All subjects in the two groups will receive the same standard conventional non- invasive management advised for OL as per current scientific evidence
First posted
2026-03-06
Last updated
2026-03-06

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes7

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryClinical response: Number of patients with Complete response/ Partial response/ No response/ alteration in clinical patternBaseline, 4 weeks, 12 weeks
a. Clinical response(Chen et al 2021)(42): 1. complete remission of the lesion clinically evaluated; Complete Response CR 2. partial reduction of at least 20% in the total diameter of the lesion; Partial response PR 3. reduction of the lesion by less than 20% in diameter; No Response NR 4. alteration in the clinical pattern of the lesion (homogeneous and non- homogeneous).
SecondaryLesion sizeBaseline, 4 weeks, 12 weeks(bidimensional measurement in cm and area in cm2 ) using Image J software
SecondaryLesion roughness/ whiteness: Number of patients with total resolution/ Moderate resolution/ Minimal change/ No visible changeBaseline, 4 weeks, 12 weeks
Lesion roughness/ whiteness score (Femanio et al 2001)(68): 0: Total resolution of lesions 1. Moderate resolution= reduction of consistency with leveling of the lesion 2. Minimal change= reduction of consistency without leveling of the lesion 3. No visible change
SecondaryOral Health quality of Life: Number of patients with OHIP-14 scores 0-8baseline, 4 weeks, 12 weeksAssessment of oral health quality of life using Oral Health Impact Profile -14 questionnaire: (Score 0-8)
SecondaryConcentration of salivary molecular markers ( IL6, TNF-α, PCNA, Survivin and VEGF)Baseline, 4 weeksEstimation of concentration of salivary molecular markers ( IL6, TNF-α, PCNA, Survivin and VEGF) by ELISA after completion of treatment at 4 weeks from baseline
Othertime to complete responseup to 12 weeksThe time required from baseline for complete response in both groups
OtherOral pain/ burning sensation scores 0-10upto 4 weeksOral pain/ burning sensation assessment using The numeric rating scale (NRS) from 0-10

Outcomes0

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

None in this release.

Results by group0

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

None in this release.

Participant flow0

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

None in this release.

Adverse events0

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

None in this release.

Adverse event totals0

The totals the trial posted for each group.

None in this release.

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT07453472

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT07453472/registered