ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT07493226

Efficacy of Chemically Distinct Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs) and Pain Phenotypes in Adhesive Capsulitis

NCT07493226, Not applicable, Recruiting, Konya Beyhekim Training and Research Hospital

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Efficacy of Chemically Distinct Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs) and Pain Phenotypes in Adhesive Capsulitis. Trials, record NCT07493226. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT07493226

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Efficacy of Chemically Distinct Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs) and Pain Phenotypes in Adhesive Capsulitis
NCT number
NCT07493226
Status
Recruiting
Phases
Not applicable
Enrollment
120 participants, estimated
Lead sponsor
Konya Beyhekim Training and Research Hospital
Conditions
Frozen Shoulder, Adhesive Capsulitis, Shoulder Pain, NSAID (Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drug), Nociplastic Pain, Neuropathic Pain
Interventions
Propionic acid deriaves, acetic acid derivatives, oxicam derivatives
First posted
2026-03-25
Last updated
2026-05-14

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes8

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryVAS pain (0-10) (night and movement)Baseline, Week 1, and Week 2Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain: 0 = no pain, 10 = worst imaginable/unbearable pain.
PrimaryRange of motion (ROM)Baseline, and Week 2
Movements of the affected shoulder (flexion, abduction, internal and external rotation) will be measured and recorded using a goniometer. The presence of limitation will be assessed by comparing it to the unaffected side.
PrimarySPADI :Shoulder Pain and Disability IndexBaseline, and Week 2
The Shoulder Pain and Functionality Index (SPADI) is a self-report scale developed to assess the severity of shoulder pain and its impact on functionality. The scale consists of two sub-sections: pain (5 items) and functionality (8 items). Each item is scored from 0 (no pain or difficulty) to 10 (unbearable pain or extreme difficulty). The total score ranges from 0 to 100; higher scores indicate more severe pain and loss of function.
SecondaryDN4 Neuropathic Pain QuestionnaireBaselineThis is a questionnaire that compiles symptoms and findings associated with neuropathic pain. It is scored on a scale of 0-10. A score above 4 is considered indicative of neuropathic pain.
SecondaryCentral Sensitization InventoryBaseline
This is a 25-item self-report scale that measures central nervous system hypersensitivity to normal stimuli (central sensitization), a condition that plays a role in the pathophysiology of chronic pain. It aids in diagnosis of chronic pain syndromes such as fibromyalgia by scoring common somatic and emotional symptoms on a scale of 0-100.
SecondarySleep Quality ScaleBaseline, and Week 2
Sleep quality during the preceding week was evaluated using the Single-Item Sleep Quality Scale (SQS), a brief and practical instrument derived from item 6 of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index. The scale evaluates sleep quality using a VAS ranging from 0 to 10, which is then categorized on a 0-4 scale, ranging from 0 (terrible) to 4 (excellent)."
SecondaryPain Catastrophizing ScaleBaseline, and Week 2
This is a 13-item self-report questionnaire, scored from 0 to 52, that measures negative cognitive and emotional responses to pain experiences, such as helplessness, exaggeration (magnification), and rumination. It is widely used in chronic pain management and in determining a patient's sensitivity to pain.
SecondaryPatient satisfaction (subjective impression of improvement)2nd week
Patient satisfaction subjective evaluation is the measurement of a patient's personal perceptions, feelings, and expectations regarding the healthcare service received, physician communication, hospital environment, and treatment outcomes, through surveys or interviews. Patient satisfaction (subjective impression of improvement) was assessed using a five-point Likert-type scale. Response options were defined as follows: 1, "no satisfaction at all"; 2, "not satisfied"; 3, neutral (no positive or negative effect); 4, "satisfied"; and 5, "very satisfied."

Outcomes0

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

None in this release.

Results by group0

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

None in this release.

Participant flow0

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

None in this release.

Adverse events0

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

None in this release.

Adverse event totals0

The totals the trial posted for each group.

None in this release.

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT07493226

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT07493226/registered