Trial · NCT07498959
Primary RPLND Versus Systemic Chemotherapy in Good-prognosis Metastatic Testicular Cancer
NCT07498959, Not applicable, Recruiting, Sahlgrenska University Hospital
3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0
Cite this record
ConductScience Library. Primary RPLND Versus Systemic Chemotherapy in Good-prognosis Metastatic Testicular Cancer. Trials, record NCT07498959. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT07498959
On this page
Trial
As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.
- Title
- Primary RPLND Versus Systemic Chemotherapy in Good-prognosis Metastatic Testicular Cancer
- NCT number
- NCT07498959
- Status
- Recruiting
- Phases
- Not applicable
- Enrollment
- 160 participants, estimated
- Lead sponsor
- Sahlgrenska University Hospital
- Conditions
- Testicular Cancer, Seminoma, Quality of Life, De-escalation, RPLND
- Interventions
- primary RPLND for low-stage metasatatic seminoma, 3 courses of chemotherapy; Blemocin, Etoposide and Platinum (BEP)
- First posted
- 2026-03-27
- Last updated
- 2026-03-27
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Registered outcomes6
Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.
| List | Outcome | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | HRQOL after treatment as measured by the EORTC QLQ-C30 with the testicular cancer-specific supplement EORTC QLQ-TC26 | 2 years | Changes across study-groups in global HRQOL after treatment as measured by the EORTC QLQ-C30 with the testicular cancer-specific supplement EORTC QLQ-TC26 The QLQ-C30 comprises both multi-item scales and single-item measures. These include five functional scales, three symptom scales, a global health status / QoL scale, and six single items. Each of the multi-item scales includes a different set of items - no item occurs in more than one scale. All of the scales and single-item measures range in score from 0 to 100. A high scale score represents a higher response level. Thus a high score for a functional scale represents a high / healthy level of functioning, a high score for the global health status / QoL represents a high QoL, but a high score for a symptom scale / item represents a high level of symptomatology / problems. |
| Secondary | Fatigue after RPLND vs. chemotherapy | 2 years | Differences in fatigue across study-groups as measured by the Fatigue Questionnaire (FQ). The FQ is an established, self-report fatigue questionnaire comprising 14 items that assess the intensity of fatigue-related symptoms. Each item was rated on a 4-point Likert scale (0 'better than usual', 1 'no more than usual', 2 'worse than usual', 3 'much worse than usual'). The FQ score is the sum of all items' scores (range 0-42). |
| Secondary | Ejaculation problems | 2 years | Differences across study-groups in patient-reported prevalence of retrograde ejaculation as assessed by two "supplementary" questions. These questions concern difficulties achieving ejaculation following sexual stimulation and whether the amount of semen is considered a problem. Answers are given on 4-point scales (no sexual stimulation has occurred, big difficulties (achieving ejaculation), small difficulties, no difficulties, and no sexual stimulation has occurred, large problem (amount of semen), small problem, no problem, respectively). |
| Secondary | Treatment related complications | 2 years | Rate of doctor-reported complications related to treatment in the study-groups. Journals are reviewed to gather information regarding the time and type of complication. Surgery group: Surgical complications are classified according to the Clavien-Dindo (CD) system, a standardised, 5-grade system used to grade surgical complications based on the level of therapeutic intervention required to manage them. Chemotherapy group: Complications following chemotherapy are classified according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, using a 1-5 scale to grade the severity of the event. |
| Secondary | Healt economy | 2 years | Differences in quality-adjusted life years across study groups as measured by the EQ-5D-5L tool, consisting of an index varying from 1 (full health) to 0 (dead), with scores below 0 indicating states worse than being dead. The index is evaluated at baseline (before start of treatment) and at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months thereafter. |
| Secondary | PFS | 10 years | Progression-free survival (PFS) are evaluated in both study groups. Medical records and national registers are used to identify recurrences of testicular cancer. Patients who do not have elevated markers or radiological evidence of disease recurrence or progression are considered free of recurrence or progression. The outcome will be dated and dicomotized (progression: yes/no). |
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Outcomes0
Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.
None in this release.
Results by group0
Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.
None in this release.
Participant flow0
How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.
None in this release.
Adverse events0
Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.
None in this release.
Adverse event totals0
The totals the trial posted for each group.
None in this release.
Papers7
The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.
Grants0
The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.
None in this release.
Trial comparisons0
Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.
None in this release.
Tests0
The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.
None in this release.
Data dates
The day each source was copied for this release.
Sources 3
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
- ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
- NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
- ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
- NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)
ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.
For software
Read this trial from software.
The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.
GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT07498959
GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT07498959/registered