ConductScience.org, home

Library / Trials

A Multicenter Interventional Study on the Use of a 3-Degree-of-Freedom (3DOF) Platform to Evaluate the Safety and Usability of the System and Its Impact on Balance, Proprioception, and Neurological Deficits in the Rehabilitation of Patients With Neurological Disorders.

NCT07502937, Not applicable, Not yet recruiting, University of Pavia

Trial 10

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

FieldValueSource
Title
A Multicenter Interventional Study on the Use of a 3-Degree-of-Freedom (3DOF) Platform to Evaluate the Safety and Usability of the System and Its Impact on Balance, Proprioception, and Neurological Deficits in the Rehabilitation of Patients With Neurological Disorders.
ClinicalTrials.gov
NCT numberNCT07502937ClinicalTrials.gov
StatusNot yet recruitingClinicalTrials.gov
PhasesNot applicableClinicalTrials.gov
Enrollment60 participants, estimatedClinicalTrials.gov
Lead sponsorUniversity of PaviaClinicalTrials.gov
ConditionsNeurological Disorders, Health Adult SubjectsClinicalTrials.gov
Interventions3DOF balance board robotic platform group, Conventional RehabilitationClinicalTrials.gov
First posted2026-03-31ClinicalTrials.gov
Last updated2026-04-06ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes 19

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescriptionSource
PrimaryIncidence of Adverse EventsFrom the first session to the end of the intervention, up to 4 weeks
Safety of the 3DoF platform for participants and operators will be assessed by recording the incidence and frequency of adverse events reported by the participant or observed by the operator during each study session. Adverse events include, for example, falls or episodes of instability during platform use, post-exercise musculoskeletal pain, technical malfunctions of the platform, dizziness or nausea related to vestibular stimulation or virtual reality, and premature interruption of the session by the participant or therapist.
ClinicalTrials.gov
PrimaryEvaluation of System Usability Scale (SUS)Session 12 (final evaluation, Week 4).
SUS consists of a series of 10 questions, which users answer using a 5-point Likert scale ranging from "strongly disagree" to "strongly agree." The questions are designed to assess various aspects of usability, such as ease of use, complexity and user satisfaction. Total score ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better usability.
ClinicalTrials.gov
PrimaryEvaluation of Quality of Care Through the Patient's Eyes (QUEST) 2.0Session 12 (final evaluation, Week 4).
This QUEST 2.0 questionnaire is used to assess patient satisfaction with healthcare services. "QUEST" stands for "Quality of Care Through the Patient's Eyes" and was developed to measure patients' perceptions of the quality of healthcare services and support. Version 2.0 is an update of the original questionnaire designed to make it more comprehensive and suitable for various healthcare settings. Reported as total questionnaire score; higher scores indicate greater satisfaction with the device and related services.
ClinicalTrials.gov
PrimaryEvaluation of Technology Assisted Rehabilitation Patient Perception QuestionnaireSession 12 (final evaluation, Week 4).
To assess the patient perception of the technology assisted rehabilitation using the Technology Assisted Rehabilitation Patient Perception Questionnaire (TARPP-Q). The TARPP-Q consists of 10 questions with multiple choice answers, totalling 29 items. The Questionnaire assesses patients' personal experiences and perceptions of technology assisted rehabilitation, including aspects like usability, positive attitude, hindrance perception, and distress. Reported as total questionnaire score; higher scores indicate a more positive perception of technology-assisted rehabilitation.
ClinicalTrials.gov
PrimaryChange from baseline in State-Trait Anxiety InventoryBaseline (Session 1) and Session 12 (final evaluation, Week 4)
STAI: This stands for "State-Trait Anxiety Inventory," a psychometric questionnaire used to assess anxiety levels in adults. There are two versions of the questionnaire: one measures state anxiety (momentary, situational) and the other measures trait anxiety (stable, dispositional). Total score ranges from 20 to 80, with higher scores indicating greater anxiety.
ClinicalTrials.gov
PrimaryChange From Baseline in Perceived Stress Scale (PSS)Baseline (Session 1) and Session 12 (final evaluation, Week 4)Change in self-reported stress related to the activity performed during device use, assessed with the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS). Higher scores indicate greater perceived stress.ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryChange from baseline in Berg Balance ScaleBaseline (Session 1) and Session 12 (final evaluation, Week 4)
Change in balance performance assessed with the Berg Balance Scale (BBS). The BBS evaluates balance and stability across 14 tasks. . Total score ranges from 0 to 56, with higher scores indicating better balance performance.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Timed Up and Go (TUG)Baseline (Session 1) and Session 12 (final evaluation, Week 4)
Change in mobility and balance assessed with the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test, defined as the time required to stand up from a chair, walk 3 meters, turn, walk back, and sit down. Lower values indicate better performance.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryChange From Baseline in 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT)Baseline (Session 1) and Session 12 (final evaluation, Week 4)Change in functional walking capacity assessed with the 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT), defined as the distance walked in 6 minutes. Higher values indicate better performance.ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryChange From Baseline in 10-Meter Walk Test (10MWT)Baseline (Session 1) and Session 12 (final evaluation, Week 4)Change in gait performance assessed with the 10-Meter Walk Test (10MWT), used to evaluate walking speed over 10 meters. Higher values indicate better performance. Time Frame:ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Fugl-Meyer Assessment ScoreBaseline (Session 1) and Session 12 (final evaluation, Week 4)Change in motor, sensory, and balance function assessed with the Fugl-Meyer Assessment. Higher scores indicate better neurological function.ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Exergame Path Completion TimeBaseline (Session 1) and Session 12 (final evaluation, Week 4)Change in device-recorded performance during the exergame, defined as the time required to complete the exergame path, measured in seconds. Lower values indicate better performance.ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryChange From Baseline in quality of life (EuroQol-5D)Baseline (Session 1) and Session 12 (final evaluation, Week 4)Change in health-related quality of life assessed with the EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D). Score ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better perceived health status.ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryPsychosocial Impact of Assistive Devices Scale (PIADS)Session 12 (final evaluation, Week 4)
Psychosocial impact of the device assessed at the end of treatment with the Psychosocial Impact of Assistive Devices Scale (PIADS), including perceived effects on functional capability, self-efficacy, and participation. Higher scores indicate a more positive psychosocial impact of the device.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Trail Making Test Part A PerformanceBaseline (Session 1) and Session 12 (final evaluation, Week 4)Change in cognitive performance assessed with Trail Making Test Part A. Lower values indicate better performance.ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Stroop Test PerformanceBaseline (Session 1) and Session 12 (final evaluation, Week 4)Change in cognitive performance assessed with the Stroop Test. Higher scores indicate better cognitive performance.ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Digit Span Test ScoreBaseline (Session 1) and Session 12 (final evaluation, Week 4)Change in working memory and attention assessed with the Digit Span Test. Higher scores indicate better working memory performance.ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Target Collection AccuracyBaseline (Session 1, Week 1) and Session 12 (Week 4)Change in device-recorded exergame performance, defined as the percentage of targets successfully collected during the task. Higher values indicate better performance.ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Obstacle Avoidance AccuracyBaseline (Session 1, Week 1) and Session 12 (Week 4)Change in device-recorded exergame performance, defined as the percentage of obstacles correctly avoided during the task. Higher values indicate better performance.ClinicalTrials.gov

Outcomes 0

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured asSource

Results by group 0

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnitsSource

Participant flow 0

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits countedSource

Adverse events 0

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEventsSource

Adverse event totals 0

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt riskSource

Papers 0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource

Grants 0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

ProjectTitlePrincipal investigatorsOrganizationFunderFiscal yearsSource

Trial comparisons 0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource

Tests 3

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

TestNamed asSource
Digit Span TestSecondary outcomeConductCognition
Stroop Color-Word TestSecondary outcomeConductCognition
Trail Making Test ASecondary outcomeConductCognition

Source 5

FieldValueSource
Releasetrials-2026-11-12-0.4.0ClinicalTrials.gov
Release manifest SHA-2560f4a8d8c48aee2a7573ae0fa94ecbeab70c1adbe449bbc95c424bc7d3e97b9d4ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry capture2026-11-12ClinicalTrials.gov
Results copy, AACT2026-03-23ClinicalTrials.gov
NIH clinical studies file2026-11-13ClinicalTrials.gov

The same record as JSON

Release trials-2026-11-12-0.4.0

ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACT: ClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299 ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

ClinicalTrials.gov: none stated ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project files: Public domain (NIH RePORTER)