ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT07531940

Escalating Doses of Memantine in Down Syndrome (MEDS-123)

NCT07531940, Phase 1, Not yet recruiting, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Escalating Doses of Memantine in Down Syndrome (MEDS-123). Trials, record NCT07531940. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT07531940

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Escalating Doses of Memantine in Down Syndrome (MEDS-123)
NCT number
NCT07531940
Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Phase 1
Enrollment
25 participants, estimated
Lead sponsor
University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center
Conditions
Down Syndrome, Intellectual Disability, Alzheimer Dementia (AD)
Interventions
Memantine
First posted
2026-04-15
Last updated
2026-10-05

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes14

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimarySafety and Tolerability (as measured by incidence of adverse events)27 weeks for the first 10 participants and 36 weeks for the next 15 participants if the 60 mg/day-dose proves to be safe.
Incidence of adverse events (AEs) will be monitored by clinical history, physical examinations, electrocardiograms (ECGs), and clinical laboratory tests during and after exposure to the up to three doses of memantine (20, 40, and potentially 60 mg/day; PO). Investigators will record any AE reported by the participants and caregivers and any clinically significant abnormalities. Memantine is expected to be well tolerated at higher than the typical dose used in the treatment of Alzheimer's disease (20 mg/day) by at least 80% of the study participants (more precisely, \< 6 participants will drop out of the study due to AEs related to the study medication). Participation discontinuation can be initiated by either the PI/co-investigators or participant/caregiver. Safety data will be collected at the 40 mg/day dose in the first 10 study participants, and a third dose (60 mg/day) will be added (in consultation with the FDA) for the next 15 participants only if 40 mg/day proves to be safe.
SecondaryEfficacy of the Drug Memantine as Assessed by Change in Score on the California Verbal Learning Test-II (CVLT-II) Short Form Total Free Recall27 weeks for the first 10 participants and 36 weeks for the next 15 participants if the 60 mg/day-dose proves to be safe.
This secondary outcome measure is focused on episodic memory. The CVLT-III short form assesses supraspan word learning ability as an index of episodic verbal long-term memory. The hypothesis to be tested is that treatment with memantine will produce significant improvements in this test. The main dependent variable selected, based on prior literature was the total number of target items correct summed across learning trials 1-4. The values for this measure will be recorded as change in score from baseline (i.e., before drug intervention or T1) to after the treatment at each of the two-to-three doses and at washout \[T2, T3, T4, and potentially T5 (if the 60 mg/day receives the go-ahead from the FDA\]. Scale Range: from 0 to 36; higher scores represent better outcomes. Different word lists will be used at each testing session to reduce practice effects.
SecondaryEfficacy of the Drug Memantine as Assessed by Change in Score on the Recall of Digits Forward (From the Differential Ability Scales; DAS-II)27 weeks for the first 10 participants and 36 weeks for the next 15 participants if the 60 mg/day-dose proves to be safe.
This is a measure of rote short-term verbal memory. The hypothesis to be tested is that treatment with memantine will produce significant improvements in this test. Total number of items correct will be used as the dependent variable. The values for this measure will be recorded as change in score from baseline (i.e., before drug intervention or T1) to after the treatment at each of the two-to-three doses and at washout \[T2, T3, T4, and potentially T5 (if the 60 mg/day receives the go-ahead from the FDA\]. The minimum value for this scale is 0 and the maximum value is 38; higher scores mean a better outcome.
OtherExploratory Assessment of Change in Score on the Paired Associates Learning (PAL) From the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery (CANTAB)27 weeks for the first 10 participants and 36 weeks for the next 15 participants if the 60 mg/day-dose proves to be safe.
This is a measure of non-verbal memory that requires the participant to learn associations between an abstract visual pattern and its location. Two dependent variables have been selected: Total number of items correct on the first trial of each stage, and total number of stages completed. The values for this measure will be recorded as change in score from baseline (i.e., before drug intervention or T1) to after the treatment at each of the two-to-three doses and at washout \[T2, T3, T4, and potentially T5 (if the 60 mg/day receives the go-ahead from the FDA\]. The minimum value of the PAL Memory Score Scale is 0 and the maximum value is 21; higher scores mean better outcomes.
OtherExploratory Assessment of Change in Score on the Pattern Recognition Memory (PRM; Part of the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery -- CANTAB)27 weeks for the first 10 participants and 36 weeks for the next 15 participants if the 60 mg/day-dose proves to be safe.
This is a measure of non-verbal memory. Total number correct across the two series of items presented will be used as the dependent variable. The values for this measure have been recorded as change in score from baseline (i.e., before drug intervention or T1) to after the treatment at each of the two-to-three doses and at washout \[T2, T3, T4, and potentially T5 (if the 60 mg/day receives the go-ahead from the FDA\]. The PRM total scale will be used in this study, which represents the sum of the PRM correct scores (ranging from 0 to 24) and the PRM delayed scores (ranging from 0 to 24). Therefore, the range of the PRM total scale is from 0 to 48; higher values mean better outcomes.
OtherIntellectual Functioning of the Participants as Assessed by Change in Score on the Matrices Subtest of the Differential Ability Scales-II (DAS-II)18 weeks for the first 10 participants and 27 weeks for the next 15 participants if the 60 mg/day-dose proves to be safe.
This test provides a measure of non-verbal reasoning ability that requires subjects to visually inspect a matrix of 4 or 9 pictures that has a missing piece. Participants have to infer a rule or pattern in the stimuli and select the appropriate response from a range of 4-6 possibilities. Because age norms are not available for individuals older than 17y11m, the ability score will be used as the dependent variable. This is an intermediate score based on Rasch modeling that corrects for different items set being administered to participants. The minimum value of the DAS-II Rasch Score Scale is 0 and the maximum value is 153; higher scores mean better outcomes. Values for this measure will be recorded as changes in score from baseline (T1) to after treatment with the highest tolerable dose of memantine.
OtherLinguistic Functioning of the Participants as Assessed by Change in Score on the Test for Reception of Grammar 2nd Edition (TROG-II)18 weeks for the first 10 participants and 27 weeks for the next 15 participants if the 60 mg/day-dose proves to be safe.
This is a measure of receptive syntax skills. Participants are asked to point to a picture (out of 4) that corresponds to a phrase or sentence spoken by the examiner. The total number of items correct (rather than blocks passed) will be used as the dependent variable, following the administration manual's ceiling rule. Values for this measure will be recorded as changes in score from baseline (T1) to after treatment with the highest tolerable dose of memantine. The minimum value of the scores is 0 and the maximum value is 40; with higher scores considered to be a better outcome.
OtherLinguistic Functioning of the Participants as Assessed by Change in Score on the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-IV (PPVT-IV)18 weeks for the first 10 participants and 27 weeks for the next 15 participants if the 60 mg/day-dose proves to be safe.
This is a measure of receptive semantics, whereby the participant is asked to point to a picture (out of 4) that corresponds to a word spoken by the examiner. As this test has a 0.85 correlation with composite measures of Verbal IQ (i.e. from the Wechsler Intelligence Scale series), it can be used in conjunction with the Matrices subtest to estimate overall intellectual functioning. The total number of items correct will be used as the dependent variable, following the administration manual's rules for floors and ceilings. Values for this measure will be recorded as changes in score from baseline (T1) to after treatment with the highest tolerable dose of memantine. The minimum value for this scale is 0 and the maximum value is 192, higher scores mean a better outcome.
OtherAdaptive/Behavioral Functioning of the Participants as Assessed by Change in Score on the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales, Third Edition (Vineland 3)18 weeks for the first 10 participants and 27 weeks for the next 15 participants if the 60 mg/day-dose proves to be safe.
This is a measure of adaptive functioning that integrates information from 4 different domains (Communication, Daily Living Skills, Socialization, Motor Skills). It is in a questionnaire format, which a caregiver can complete while the participant is being tested. The Interview and Parent/Caregiver Form will be used. This form is normed for 3-21 years old. Standard scores for all indices will be derived from age norms and raw score will used as dependent variables. The Broad Independence Score will be recorded as change in score from baseline (T1) to after treatment with the highest tolerable dose of memantine.
OtherMeasurement of plasma biomarkers of Alzheimer's disease27 weeks for the first 10 participants and 36 weeks for the next 15 participants if the 60 mg/day-dose proves to be safe.
The hypothesis to be tested is that either 40 mg/day or 60 mg/day memantine will produce significant improvements in neuropsychological test scores and, potentially, in plasma biomarkers of Alzheimer's disease (such as Aβ40, Aβ42, p-tau181, pTau217, p-tau231, sTREM2, GFAP, and NfL). Assessments of plasma levels will be made as change in biomarker levels from baseline (i.e., before drug intervention or T1) to after the treatment at each of the two-to-three doses and at washout \[T2, T3, T4, and potentially T5 (if the 60 mg/day receives the go-ahead from the FDA\].

Outcomes0

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

None in this release.

Results by group0

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

None in this release.

Participant flow0

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

None in this release.

Adverse events0

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

None in this release.

Adverse event totals0

The totals the trial posted for each group.

None in this release.

Papers24

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
6234474BACKGROUNDPubMed
17314583BACKGROUNDPubMed
17700645BACKGROUNDPubMed
17904591BACKGROUNDPubMed
17910085BACKGROUNDPubMed
20363261BACKGROUNDPubMed
20421694BACKGROUNDPubMed
22101180BACKGROUNDPubMed
22236802BACKGROUNDPubMed
22806212BACKGROUNDPubMed

1 to 10 of 24

See all 24 papers

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests4

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

TestNamed asSource
Paired Associate LearningOther outcomeConductCognition
Pattern Recognition MemoryOther outcomeConductCognition
Verbal LearningSecondary outcomeConductCognition
Vocabulary TestOther outcomeConductCognition

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT07531940

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT07531940/papers?page=2