ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT07555886

Intervention in Executive Functions and Emotional Self-Regulation in Adolescents With Primary Dysmenorrhea

NCT07555886, Not applicable, Not yet recruiting, Universidad Autonoma de Baja California

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.4.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Intervention in Executive Functions and Emotional Self-Regulation in Adolescents With Primary Dysmenorrhea. Trials, record NCT07555886. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.4.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT07555886

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Intervention in Executive Functions and Emotional Self-Regulation in Adolescents With Primary Dysmenorrhea
NCT number
NCT07555886
Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Not applicable
Enrollment
35 participants, estimated
Lead sponsor
Universidad Autonoma de Baja California
Conditions
Menstrual Cramps
Interventions
Cognitive restructuring techniques and psychoeducation to improve coping strategies for menstrual pain.
First posted
2026-04-29
Last updated
2026-05-18

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes5

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryMenstrual painPre-post intervention evaluation, after 8 weeks
A Visual Analog Scale (VAS) (Hayes, MHS, \& Patterson, DG (1921). Experimental development of the graphical rating method. Psychological Bulletin, 18) is a psychometric tool used to measure subjective and continuous phenomena such as pain, mood, or appetite. It typically consists of a 10 cm (100 mm) horizontal line anchored by opposite endpoints (e.g., "no pain" to "the worst pain imaginable"). The patient marks a point on the line corresponding to their current intensity. The distance (in mm) from the left anchor ("no pain") to the mark is measured, yielding a score from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate greater severity. Typical cutoff points are: 0-4 mm (painless), 5-44 mm (mild), 45-74 mm (moderate), and 75-100 mm (severe). It is commonly used in clinical settings to assess symptoms, monitor treatment progress, or measure health-related quality of life. While the horizontal scale is the standard, vertical lines or digital "slider
SecondaryExecutive functioningPre-post intervention evaluation, after 8 weeks
The BRIEF-2 self-report questionnaire (Gioia, Isquith, Guy, \& Kenworthy, 2017) is a 55-item questionnaire designed for adolescents (ages 11-18) to assess their own executive functions-cognitive, emotional, and behavioral regulation-in daily life. It helps identify the strengths and weaknesses perceived by the adolescent themselves, complementing reports from parents and teachers to guide interventions, especially in cases of ADHD, autism, and learning difficulties. Interpretation is based on T-scores (with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10), which are the standard for determining the clinical significance of executive functions. This instrument has undergone several adaptations for the Mexican population.
SecondaryStroop testPre-post intervention evaluation, after 8 weeks
Stroop test, will be measured from the standardized executive function test BANFE ( Neuropsychological Battery for Executive Functions and Frontal Lobes), using accuracy of response, stroop type error, no-Stroop errors, and time, Total score is transformed to normalized points 0-19 (with a mean of 10 ±3 SD, 4-6 low, 14-19 high performance).
SecondaryGambling testPre-post intervention evaluation, after 8 weeks
Gambling test, will be measured by calculating EF quotients from the standardized test BANFE (Neuropsychological Battery for Executive Functions and Frontal Lobes) using risk cards percentage, final total score. Total score is transformed to normalized points 0-19 (with a mean of 10 ±3 SD, 4-6 low, 14-19 high performance).
SecondaryEmotion RegulationPre-post intervention evaluation, after 8 weeks
The Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS) (Gratz y Roemer, 2004) is a 36-item, self-report questionnaire designed to measure a person's typical levels of emotion dysregulation across six domains: nonacceptance of emotions, difficulty engaging in goal-directed behavior, impulse control difficulties, lack of emotional awareness, limited access to regulation strategies, and lack of clarity. Raw scores range from 36 to 180. Higher scores indicate greater difficulties with emotional regulation. A high score suggests difficulties in accepting emotions, a lack of effective strategies, and impulsive dyscontrol in response to distress.This instrument has been validated and adapted for the target population.

Outcomes0

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

None in this release.

Results by group0

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

None in this release.

Participant flow0

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

None in this release.

Adverse events0

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

None in this release.

Adverse event totals0

The totals the trial posted for each group.

None in this release.

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests1

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

TestNamed as
Stroop Color-Word TestSecondary outcome

Source

Release
trials-2026-11-12-0.4.0
Release manifest SHA-256
0f4a8d8c48aee2a7573ae0fa94ecbeab70c1adbe449bbc95c424bc7d3e97b9d4
Registry capture
2026-11-12
Results copy, AACT
2026-03-23
NIH clinical studies file
2026-11-13

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT07555886

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT07555886/registered