ConductScience.org, home

Library / Trials

Investigating Cognitive Flexibility Training

NCT07556250, Not applicable, Not yet recruiting, Nanyang Technological University

Trial 10

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

FieldValueSource
TitleInvestigating Cognitive Flexibility TrainingClinicalTrials.gov
NCT numberNCT07556250ClinicalTrials.gov
StatusNot yet recruitingClinicalTrials.gov
PhasesNot applicableClinicalTrials.gov
Enrollment225 participants, estimatedClinicalTrials.gov
Lead sponsorNanyang Technological UniversityClinicalTrials.gov
ConditionsHealthyClinicalTrials.gov
InterventionsExperimental (Implicit Training): Structure Learning Training, Active Control (Explicit Training): 'All You Can E.T.'ClinicalTrials.gov
First posted2026-04-29ClinicalTrials.gov
Last updated2026-04-29ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes 123

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescriptionSource
PrimaryStructure Learning Outcome 1 - Performance Index (PI) RelativeThrough training completion (adaptive, up to 12 days)
Performance index (PI) is the minimum overlap between the distribution of participant responses and the distribution of presented targets per context. The overall PI is then the average of the performance indices across contexts. The PI relative is a normalised PI measure that quantifies participant's performance relative to random guessing.
ClinicalTrials.gov
PrimaryStructure Learning Outcome 2 - Strategy choiceThrough training completion (adaptive, up to 12 days)
Strategy choice is the difference between the Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence from model matching to the response-based model and the KL divergence from model maximization to the response-based model. Positive strategy choice values indicate a strategy closer to matching, whereas negative values indicate a strategy closer to maximization.
ClinicalTrials.gov
PrimaryStructure Learning Outcome 3 - Strategy ICD index (measured by the integral curve difference)Through training completion (adaptive, up to 12 days)Derived by calculating the integral of each participant's strategy curve and subtracting it from the integral of the exact matching curve, as defined by model matching across training.ClinicalTrials.gov
PrimaryStructure Learning Outcome 4 - Learning rateThrough training completion (adaptive, up to 12 days)Rate of learning across the training sessions or days.ClinicalTrials.gov
PrimaryStructure Learning Outcome 5 - Strategy shifting rateThrough training completion (adaptive, up to 12 days)Rate of strategy change across the training sessions or days.ClinicalTrials.gov
Primary'All You Can E.T.' (AYCET) Outcome 1 - AccuracyThrough training completion (adaptive, up to 12 days)
Accuracy is defined as the proportion of correct responses across trials, based on whether the participant selects the correct food or drink item for each alien according to the currently active rule set (e.g., colour, shape, or appearance rules). Accuracy may be computed overall and across levels of rule complexity.
ClinicalTrials.gov
Primary'All You Can E.T.' (AYCET) Outcome 2 - Response Time (RT)Through training completion (adaptive, up to 12 days)
Response Time (RT) is defined as the latency between stimulus presentation and participant response on each trial. Mean or median RT will be computed across correct trials to index processing speed under changing rule demands. RT may also be summarized across levels of rule complexity.
ClinicalTrials.gov
PrimaryCognitive Flexibility (Strategy) Outcome 1 - Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST): Proportion of perseverative errorsPost-intervention (within one week after post-MRI scan)Proportion of error trials where participants incorrectly choose a deck based on the rule from the previous set.ClinicalTrials.gov
PrimaryCognitive Flexibility (Strategy) Outcome 2 - Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST): Learning ratePost-intervention (within one week after post-MRI scan)
This is a parameter extracted from a sequential learning model fitted to WCST data and represents how quickly participants updated their beliefs about the values associated with choices following respective negative and positive feedback.
ClinicalTrials.gov
PrimaryCognitive Flexibility (Strategy) Outcome 3 - Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST): Decision consistencyPost-intervention (within one week after post-MRI scan)
This is a parameter extracted from a sequential learning model fitted to WCST data and influenced the estimated probability of choosing a specific stimulus per trial. Larger values indicated increased exploitation whereas lower values indicated increased exploration.
ClinicalTrials.gov
PrimaryCognitive Flexibility (Strategy) Outcome 4 - Intra/Extra-Dimensional Set Shifting (IED): Extra-dimensional set errorsPost-intervention (within one week after post-MRI scan)The number of times that the subject failed to select the stimulus compatible with the current rule on the stage where the extra-dimensional shift occurs.ClinicalTrials.gov
PrimaryCognitive Flexibility (Strategy) Outcome 5 - Intra/Extra-Dimensional Set Shifting (IED): Extra-dimensional reversal errorsPost-intervention (within one week after post-MRI scan)This is the total number of errors made in Stage 9. Lower errors mean better performance.ClinicalTrials.gov
PrimaryCognitive Flexibility (Strategy) Outcome 6 - Intra/Extra-Dimensional Set Shifting (IED): Learning ratePost-intervention (within one week after post-MRI scan)Parameter extracted from Feature Reinforcement Model.ClinicalTrials.gov
PrimaryCognitive Flexibility (Strategy) Outcome 7 - Intra/Extra-Dimensional Set Shifting (IED): Choice determinismPost-intervention (within one week after post-MRI scan)Parameter extracted from Feature Reinforcement Model.ClinicalTrials.gov
PrimaryCognitive Flexibility (Strategy) Outcome 8 - Intra/Extra-Dimensional Set Shifting (IED): Dimension primacyPost-intervention (within one week after post-MRI scan)Parameter extracted from Feature Reinforcement Model.ClinicalTrials.gov
PrimaryCognitive Flexibility (Strategy) Outcome 9 - Probabilistic Reversal Learning (PRL): PerseverationPre-intervention (within one week before pre-MRI scan) and Post-intervention (within one week after post-MRI scan)Number of trials until the participant updates their response after the rule reversal.ClinicalTrials.gov
PrimaryCognitive Flexibility (Strategy) Outcome 10 - Probabilistic Reversal Learning (PRL): Switch probabilityPre-intervention (within one week before pre-MRI scan) and Post-intervention (within one week after post-MRI scan)Number of switches in the participant responses following negative feedback (i.e. trap trials: when the less likely object is correct).ClinicalTrials.gov
PrimaryCognitive Flexibility (Strategy) Outcome 11 - Probabilistic Reversal Learning (PRL): Trials to criterion in block 2 (Reversal)Pre-intervention (within one week before pre-MRI scan) and Post-intervention (within one week after post-MRI scan)Number of trials before participant reach defined learning criterion during the Reversal phase.ClinicalTrials.gov
PrimaryCognitive Flexibility (Strategy) Outcome 12 - Probabilistic Reversal Learning (PRL): Learning ratesPre-intervention (within one week before pre-MRI scan) and Post-intervention (within one week after post-MRI scan)
Parameter extracted from the Reinforcement Learning Model based on the Rescorla-Wagner rule. Two learning rates i.e., one for positive error/reward and one for negative error/punishment can be extracted from the model.
ClinicalTrials.gov
PrimaryCognitive Flexibility (Strategy) Outcome 13 - Probabilistic Reversal Learning (PRL): Reinforcement sensitivityPre-intervention (within one week before pre-MRI scan) and Post-intervention (within one week after post-MRI scan)Parameter extracted from the Reinforcement Learning Model based on the Rescorla-Wagner rule.ClinicalTrials.gov

Outcomes 0

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured asSource

Results by group 0

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnitsSource

Participant flow 0

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits countedSource

Adverse events 0

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEventsSource

Adverse event totals 0

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt riskSource

Papers 5

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
28760866BACKGROUNDPubMed
28767668BACKGROUNDPubMed
28973111BACKGROUNDPubMed
33536614BACKGROUNDPubMed
37471399BACKGROUNDPubMed

Grants 0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

ProjectTitlePrincipal investigatorsOrganizationFunderFiscal yearsSource

Trial comparisons 0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource

Tests 19

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

TestNamed asSource
Card Sorting Test (Berg)Primary outcomeConductCognition
Digit Span TestPrimary outcomeConductCognition
Probabilistic Reversal LearningPrimary outcomeConductCognition
Stroop Color-Word TestPrimary outcomeConductCognition
Task Switching TestPrimary outcomeConductCognition
Trail Making Test APrimary outcomeConductCognition
Trail Making Test BPrimary outcomeConductCognition
Alternative Uses TaskSecondary outcomeConductCognition
Betting Choice TaskSecondary outcomeConductCognition
Delay DiscountingSecondary outcomeConductCognition
Ellsberg Urns TaskSecondary outcomeConductCognition
Iowa Gambling LiteSecondary outcomeConductCognition
Matrix ReasoningSecondary outcomeConductCognition
One-Touch Tower PlanningSecondary outcomeConductCognition
Remote Associates TestSecondary outcomeConductCognition
Repeated Prisoner's DilemmaSecondary outcomeConductCognition
Social Value OrientationSecondary outcomeConductCognition
Tower PlanningSecondary outcomeConductCognition
Verbal FluencySecondary outcomeConductCognition

Source 5

FieldValueSource
Releasetrials-2026-11-12-0.4.0ClinicalTrials.gov
Release manifest SHA-2560f4a8d8c48aee2a7573ae0fa94ecbeab70c1adbe449bbc95c424bc7d3e97b9d4ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry capture2026-11-12ClinicalTrials.gov
Results copy, AACT2026-03-23ClinicalTrials.gov
NIH clinical studies file2026-11-13ClinicalTrials.gov

The same record as JSON

Release trials-2026-11-12-0.4.0

ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACT: ClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299 ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

ClinicalTrials.gov: none stated ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project files: Public domain (NIH RePORTER)