ConductScience.org, home

Library / Trials

Prevalence of Mild Cognitive Impairment and Dementia in Patients Admitted to Non-neurological Rehabilitation Wards

NCT07731334, Not applicable, Recruiting, Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi ETS

Trial 10

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

FieldValueSource
TitlePrevalence of Mild Cognitive Impairment and Dementia in Patients Admitted to Non-neurological Rehabilitation WardsClinicalTrials.gov
NCT numberNCT07731334ClinicalTrials.gov
StatusRecruitingClinicalTrials.gov
PhasesNot applicableClinicalTrials.gov
Enrollment384 participants, estimatedClinicalTrials.gov
Lead sponsorFondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi ETSClinicalTrials.gov
ConditionsMCI, Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI), Mild Cognitive Impairment, Cognitive Deficit, Cognitive DeclineClinicalTrials.gov
InterventionsCognitive and clinical screening, Extended neuropsychological assessment, Blood biomarker sampling and APOE genotyping, Non-contrast brain CT scan, Multimodal neurophysiological assessmentClinicalTrials.gov
First posted2026-07-28ClinicalTrials.gov
Last updated2026-08-10ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes 28

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescriptionSource
PrimaryPrevalence of cognitive impairment among patients admitted for non-neurological causes to the rehabilitation wardsBaseline (T0), within approximately 10 days of hospital admission
Proportion of enrolled patients with cognitive impairment (Unit of Measure: % of patients). Confirmed via a two-stage process: (1) MoCA screening (corrected score range 0-30, higher = better), where an Equivalent Score (ES) of 0-1 in ≥1 domain triggers referral to (2) an extended battery, applying criteria adapted from Jak and Bondi (Jak et al., 2009; Bondi et al., 2014): ES ≤1 (Capitani \& Laiacona, 1997; below the 20th percentile, \~equivalent to \>1 SD below norms) on ≥2 tests within one domain, or ≥1 test in each of 3 domains (memory, language, attention/executive functioning). ES ranges 0-4 (0=worse, 4=better). Calculated as (patients with confirmed impairment / total enrolled) × 100, with 95% CI.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryRate of previously undiagnosed cognitive impairmentBaseline (T0), within approximately 10 days of hospital admission
Proportion of patients with confirmed cognitive impairment (Unit of Measure: % of patients with confirmed cognitive impairment; per the neuropsychological criteria defined in the Primary Outcome Measure) who had no prior documented diagnosis of cognitive impairment in their clinical history, calculated as (number of patients with previously undiagnosed cognitive impairment / number of patients with confirmed cognitive impairment) × 100, with 95% CI.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryClinical and demographic characteristics associated with cognitive status at baselineBaseline (T0), within approximately 10 days of hospital admission
Comparison of sociodemographic and clinical variables (Unit of Measure: N/A - descriptive comparison across subgroups) among subgroups defined by Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) Equivalent Score (ES; derived from the 0-30 corrected MoCA total score, higher scores indicating better performance): ES ≥2 (within normative range), ES=1 (borderline), ES=0 (below normative reference limit, worse performance).
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryChange in Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) Total and Domain ScoresBaseline (T0) to 12-month follow-up (T1)
Change between T0 and T1 in MoCA total score (corrected score, range 0-30, higher = better) and MoCA cognitive domain scores, including the Memory Index Score (MIS) and other domain-level indices derived from the Italian MoCA normative reference (Dapor et al., 2025), in patients with confirmed cognitive impairment at baseline: Visuo-spatial (MoCA-V corrected score, range 0-4, higher = better); Attention (MoCA-A corrected score, range 0-6, higher = better); Language (MoCA-L corrected score, range 0-5, higher = better); Executive Functions (MoCA-E corrected score, range 0-4, higher = better); Memory (MoCA-DR corrected score, range 0-5, higher = better); Orientation (MoCA-O corrected score, range 0-6, higher = better); and MIS corrected score, range 0-15, higher = better.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryChange in Digit Span PerformanceBaseline (T0) to 12-month follow-up (T1)Change in forward and backward Digit Span performance (Unit of Measure: number of digits correctly recalled, range 0-9 forward and 0-8 backward; higher = better) between T0 and T1.ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryChange in Corsi Block-Tapping Span PerformanceBaseline (T0) to 12-month follow-up (T1)Change in forward and backward Corsi Span performance (Unit of Measure: number of blocks correctly reproduced; range 0-9 forward and 0-8 backward; higher = better) between T0 and T1.ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryChange in Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT) Recall Performance and Memory Efficiency IndexBaseline (T0) to 12-month follow-up (T1)
Change in RAVLT immediate recall (Unit of Measure: number of words recalled, range 0-75; higher = better), delayed recall (number of words recalled, range 0-15; higher = better), recognition (number of words correctly recognized, range 0-15; higher = better) and Memory Efficiency Index (calculated as \[(Delayed Recall/15) / (Total Recall/75)\] + \[(Recognition Hits/15) - (False Positives/Distractors)\]; higher = better) between T0 and T1.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryChange in Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure (ROCF) PerformanceBaseline (T0) to 12-month follow-up (T1)Change in ROCF copy, immediate and delayed recall accuracy scores (Unit of Measure: accuracy score, range 0-36; higher = better) between T0 and T1.ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryChange in Screening for Aphasia in NeuroDegeneration (SAND) Naming Subtest ScoreBaseline (T0) to 12-month follow-up (T1)Change in SAND naming subtest score (Unit of Measure: number of items correctly named, range 0-14; higher = better) between T0 and T1.ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryChange in Trail Making Test (TMT) A and B Completion TimeBaseline (T0) to 12-month follow-up (T1)Change in TMT A and B completion time (Unit of Measure: time to completion in seconds; lower = better; continuous measure, not a bounded scale) between T0 and T1.ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryChange in Stroop Colour-Word Test Time and Error Interference ScoreBaseline (T0) to 12-month follow-up (T1)
Change in Stroop Colour-Word Test Time and Error Interference scores (Unit of Measure: Time Interference = T3 - \[(T1+T2)/2\], in seconds; Error Interference = E3 - \[(E1+E2)/2\], in number of errors; where T1/E1 and T2/E2 are word-reading and colour-naming performance and T3/E3 is interference-condition performance; lower = better) between T0 and T1.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryChange in Verbal Fluency PerformanceBaseline (T0) to 12-month follow-up (T1)
Change in phonemic, semantic, and alternate verbal fluency performance (Unit of Measure: number of correct words generated per condition; higher = better; continuous measure, not a bounded scale) between T0 and T1.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryChange in Cumulative Illness Rating Scale (CIRS) ScoresBaseline (T0) to 12-month follow-up (T1)
Change in CIRS Severity Index (Unit of Measure: mean severity score across organ system categories, range 0-4; higher = worse comorbidity burden) and CIRS Comorbidity Index (Unit of Measure: number of categories with severity score ≥3, i.e., decompensated conditions, range 0-13; higher = worse) between T0 and T1.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryCorrelation Between Baseline Cognitive Profile and Plasma GFAP ConcentrationBaseline (T0)
Correlation between baseline cognitive performance, assessed using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and a comprehensive neuropsychological battery, and plasma Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein concentration (Unit of Measure: pg/mL) in patients with confirmed cognitive impairment.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryCorrelation Between Baseline Cognitive Profile and Plasma NfL ConcentrationBaseline (T0)
Correlation between baseline cognitive performance, assessed using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and a comprehensive neuropsychological battery, and plasma neurofilament light chain (NfL) concentration (pg/mL) in patients with confirmed cognitive impairment.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryCorrelation Between Baseline Cognitive Profile and Plasma pTau-217 ConcentrationBaseline (T0)
Correlation between baseline cognitive performance, assessed using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and a comprehensive neuropsychological battery, and plasma phosphorylated Tau-217 concentration (Unit of Measure: pg/mL) in patients with confirmed cognitive impairment.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryCorrelation Between Baseline Cognitive Profile and APOE ε4 Allele DoseBaseline (T0)
Correlation between baseline cognitive performance, assessed using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and a comprehensive neuropsychological battery, and APOE ε4 allele dose (Unit of Measure: number of ε4 alleles per patient: 0, 1, or 2), determined by genotyping, in patients with confirmed cognitive impairment.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryAPOE Allelic Frequency DistributionBaseline (T0)
Distribution of APOE allele frequencies (Unit of Measure: % allelic frequency of ε2, ε3, and ε4, calculated as the proportion of each allele among the total alleles observed) in patients with confirmed cognitive impairment, determined by genotyping.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryCorrelation Between Baseline Cognitive Profile and Resting-State EEG Relative Spectral PowerBaseline (T0)
Correlation between baseline cognitive performance, assessed using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and a comprehensive neuropsychological battery, and resting-state EEG relative spectral power in the delta, theta, alpha, and beta bands (Unit of Measure: % relative spectral power per band) in patients with confirmed cognitive impairment.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryCorrelation Between Baseline Cognitive Profile and Auditory P300 LatencyBaseline (T0)
Correlation between baseline cognitive performance, assessed using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and a comprehensive neuropsychological battery, and P300 latency (Unit of Measure: milliseconds; lower latency = faster processing), elicited via an auditory oddball paradigm, in patients with confirmed cognitive impairment.
ClinicalTrials.gov

Outcomes 0

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured asSource

Results by group 0

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnitsSource

Participant flow 0

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits countedSource

Adverse events 0

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEventsSource

Adverse event totals 0

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt riskSource

Papers 8

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
9524875BACKGROUNDPubMed
19390294BACKGROUNDPubMed
24844687BACKGROUNDPubMed
28747225BACKGROUNDPubMed
30565543BACKGROUNDPubMed
34856117BACKGROUNDPubMed
37853320BACKGROUNDPubMed
40095163BACKGROUNDPubMed

Grants 0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

ProjectTitlePrincipal investigatorsOrganizationFunderFiscal yearsSource

Trial comparisons 0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource

Tests 8

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

TestNamed asSource
Complex Figure Copy and RecallSecondary outcomeConductCognition
Corsi Block-Tapping TestSecondary outcomeConductCognition
Digit Span TestSecondary outcomeConductCognition
Oddball Target DetectionSecondary outcomeConductCognition
Stroop Color-Word TestSecondary outcomeConductCognition
Trail Making Test ASecondary outcomeConductCognition
Verbal FluencySecondary outcomeConductCognition
Verbal LearningSecondary outcomeConductCognition

Source 5

FieldValueSource
Releasetrials-2026-11-12-0.4.0ClinicalTrials.gov
Release manifest SHA-2560f4a8d8c48aee2a7573ae0fa94ecbeab70c1adbe449bbc95c424bc7d3e97b9d4ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry capture2026-11-12ClinicalTrials.gov
Results copy, AACT2026-03-23ClinicalTrials.gov
NIH clinical studies file2026-11-13ClinicalTrials.gov

The same record as JSON

Release trials-2026-11-12-0.4.0

ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACT: ClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299 ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

ClinicalTrials.gov: none stated ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project files: Public domain (NIH RePORTER)