ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT07877948

Comparative Study of Combination Treatment of Bionerv E+ Versus Vitamin B Complex in Treatment of Diabetic Polyneuropathy in Type 2 Diabetic Patients and Its Effect on Wound Healing

NCT07877948, Not applicable, Recruiting, BREGO Life Sciences

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Comparative Study of Combination Treatment of Bionerv E+ Versus Vitamin B Complex in Treatment of Diabetic Polyneuropathy in Type 2 Diabetic Patients and Its Effect on Wound Healing. Trials, record NCT07877948. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT07877948

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Comparative Study of Combination Treatment of Bionerv E+ Versus Vitamin B Complex in Treatment of Diabetic Polyneuropathy in Type 2 Diabetic Patients and Its Effect on Wound Healing
NCT number
NCT07877948
Status
Recruiting
Phases
Not applicable
Enrollment
100 participants, estimated
Lead sponsor
BREGO Life Sciences
Conditions
Diabetic Foot Ulcer (DFU), Diabetic Symmetrical Polyneuropathy
Interventions
Alpha-Lipoic Acid, Vitamin B1, Vitamin B6, Vitamin B12, Vitamin E, Vitamin B1, Vitamin B6, Vitamin B12
First posted
2026-10-16
Last updated
2026-10-16

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes6

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryChange in Neuropathy Impairment Score-Lower Limb (NIS-LL)Baseline and Week 13
Neurological impairment is being assessed using the Neuropathy Impairment Score-Lower Limb (NIS-LL), which evaluates muscle strength, sensation, and reflexes in the lower limbs. The total score ranges from 0 to 88, with higher scores indicating greater neurological impairment. Changes in NIS-LL scores from baseline to week 13 are being compared between the two treatment groups.
PrimaryChange in Neuropathic Pain Assessed by the Short Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ)Baseline and Week 13
Neuropathic pain is being assessed using the Short Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ), which evaluates sensory and affective characteristics of pain. The questionnaire consists of 15 pain descriptors, each rated from 0 (none) to 3 (severe). Higher scores indicate greater pain severity. Changes in pain scores from baseline to week 13 are being compared between the two treatment groups.
PrimaryChange in Health-Related Quality of Life Assessed by the Short Form-36 (SF-36)Baseline and Week 13
Health-related quality of life is being assessed using the Short Form-36 (SF-36) questionnaire, which evaluates eight domains of physical and mental health. Each domain is scored from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better health-related quality of life. Changes in SF-36 domain scores from baseline to week 13 are being compared between the two treatment groups.
SecondaryChange in Serum High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (hs-CRP) LevelsBaseline and Week 13
Systemic inflammation is being evaluated by measuring serum high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) levels. Blood samples are being collected after overnight fasting, and hs-CRP levels are being measured using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Changes in hs-CRP levels from baseline to week 13 are being compared between the two treatment groups.
SecondaryChange in Serum Tumor Necrosis Factor-Alpha (TNF-alpha) LevelsBaseline and Week 13
Systemic inflammation is being evaluated by measuring serum tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) levels. Blood samples are being collected after overnight fasting, and TNF-alpha levels are being measured using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Changes in TNF-alpha levels from baseline to week 13 are being compared between the two treatment groups.
SecondaryChange in Diabetic Foot Ulcer Wound AreaBaseline and Week 13
Wound healing is being evaluated in participants with diabetic foot ulcers classified as Wagner grade 1 or 2. Wound area is being assessed through measurements of wound length and width, supported by digital imaging. Changes in wound area, measured in square centimetres (cm²), from baseline to week 13 are being compared between the two treatment groups. A smaller wound area indicates improvement in wound healing.

Outcomes0

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

None in this release.

Results by group0

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

None in this release.

Participant flow0

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

None in this release.

Adverse events0

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

None in this release.

Adverse event totals0

The totals the trial posted for each group.

None in this release.

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT07877948

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT07877948/registered