Trial · NCT07880912
Registered outcomes15
Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.
1 to 15 of 15
Download this page as JSON| List | Outcome | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Educator Knowledge of Making Proud Choices! Content and Related Sexual Health Facts | Baseline (T1), 6 week (T2) | Educator knowledge of Making Proud Choices! (MPC) curriculum content and related sexual health facts, including HIV/STI transmission and prevention, pregnancy, and condom use. Assessed via a study-developed multiple-choice/scenario-based test scored as the number of items answered correctly. The survey contains 11 items. |
| Primary | Student Knowledge, Attitudes, and Beliefs About Safer Sex Practices | Baseline (T1) and after the final session of Making Proud Choices - approximately 8 weeks apart (T2) | Composite of student-level knowledge and belief domains assessed via a study survey: HIV/STI, pregnancy, condom, and contraception knowledge (11 items, scored as percent correct); and 8 attitude/belief subscales covering condom-related beliefs (hedonistic, prevention, availability-control), negotiation/refusal self-efficacy, beliefs about sex and future goals, attitudes toward abstinence/safer sex, and attitudes toward consent (each rated on a 1-5 agreement scale, higher = more protective attitude). Domains are analyzed separately rather than combined into a single score, consistent with the original Making Proud Choices! evaluation measures on which most items are based. |
| Primary | Educator Teaching Skill Demonstrated via Response to Virtual Classroom Vignettes | Before randomization (baseline) and after completion of the training period (post-training), within approximately 6 weeks of randomization | Educator teaching skill assessed via an asynchronous video assessment. Educators watch short video vignettes depicting realistic Making Proud Choices! classroom moments (e.g., a values-based student question, activity facilitation and debrief) and record a real-time video response demonstrating what they would say and do, as though teaching that moment live (a 'teachback'). Responses are scored by trained raters using a structured coding rubric. The rubric will assign points across a defined set of teaching-skill criteria per vignette; higher total scores will indicate stronger demonstrated teaching skill. |
| Secondary | Educator Perceptions of MPC: VISTA's Relative Advantage, Compatibility, Ease of Use, and Result Demonstrability | Immediately following completion of training (post-training only); treatment (MPC: VISTA) arm only | Technology adoption measure (adapted from Moore \& Benbasat, 1991) assessing educators' perceptions of MPC: VISTA across 4 subscales: relative advantage, compatibility, ease of use, and result demonstrability (3 items each, 12 items total), rated on a 1 (strongly disagree) to 7 (strongly agree) scale. Each subscale score is the mean of its 3 items (range 1-7), with higher scores indicating a more favorable perception of the training. Administered only to educators randomized to the MPC: VISTA arm, at post-training only. |
| Secondary | Training Usability of MPC: VISTA | Immediately following completion of training (post-training only); treatment (MPC: VISTA) arm only | Post-Study System Usability Questionnaire (PSSUQ; Lewis, 1995), 19 items rated on a 1 (strongly disagree) to 7 (strongly agree) scale, with an 'N/A' option. Produces an overall usability score and 3 subscale scores: system usefulness (7 items), information quality (6 items), and interface quality (6 items). Each score is the mean of its items (range 1-7), with higher scores indicating greater perceived usability. Administered only to educators randomized to the MPC: VISTA arm, at post-training only. |
| Secondary | Educator Teaching Skill Demonstrated in Simulated MPC Classroom Scenarios | Baseline (t1), 6 weeks post (t2) | Educator teaching skill assessed via 3 written classroom scenarios depicting realistic Making Proud Choices! facilitation moments (a values-based student question and two activity-facilitation/debrief situations). For each scenario, the educator describes what they would say and do. |
| Other | Educator Fidelity to the Making Proud Choices! Curriculum | From the educator's first to final MPC module, an average of 8 weeks. | Educator fidelity to the Making Proud Choices! (MPC) curriculum, assessed via educator self-report using a log completed after each of the 8 MPC modules, of whether they completed the module's core activities (yes / only in part / no). |
| Other | Educator Self-Efficacy for Teaching Sexual Health Content | Baseline and immediately following completion of the training period (post-training) | Educator confidence and comfort teaching sexual health content, assessed via 3 measures: (1) the Sex Education Confidence Scale (SECS) knowledge subscale, 11 topics rated 1 (prefer not to answer) to 7 (very confident); (2) a 4-item measure of confidence teaching and discussing condom use, adapted from Jemmott, Jemmott \& Fong (1998), rated 1 (not at all) to 7 (extremely); and (3) a 6-item measure of confidence using core MPC facilitation strategies (e.g., brainstorming, roleplay, creating a safe environment), rated 1-7. Each measure is scored as the mean of its items, with higher scores indicating greater self-efficacy. |
| Other | Teachers' Sense of General Instructional Efficacy | Baseline and immediately following completion of the training period (post-training) | General (non-MPC-specific) teaching self-efficacy, assessed via the 12-item Teachers' Sense of Efficacy Scale (Tschannen-Moran \& Woolfolk Hoy, 2001) covering classroom management, instructional strategies, and student engagement. Each item is rated 1 (none at all) to 5 (a great deal); the overall score is the mean of all 12 items (range 1-5), with higher scores indicating greater perceived teaching efficacy. |
| Other | Educator Use of Student-Centered Instructional Practices | Baseline and immediately following completion of the training period (post-training) | Educator use of student-centered teaching practices, assessed via 2 sub-scales of the Measuring and Improving Student-Centered Learning (MISCL) toolkit: Student-Centered Instructional Practices (6 items, rated 1 \[not at all/less than monthly\] to 5 \[daily\]) and Student Agency (12 items, rated on a comparable frequency scale). Each subscale is scored as the mean of its items, with higher scores indicating more frequent use of student-centered practices. |
| Other | Educator Readiness for Online Learning | Baseline and immediately following completion of the training period (post-training) | Educator readiness for online professional learning, assessed via the 18-item Teacher Readiness for Online Learning Measure (TROLM; Hsu et al., 2015), covering 4 domains: communication, institutional support, self-directed learning, and learning transfer. Each item is rated 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree); domain scores are the mean of their items (range 1-5), with higher scores indicating greater readiness for online learning. |
| Other | Educator Computer Proficiency and Comfort With E-Learning | Baseline and immediately following completion of the training period (post-training) | Educator computer proficiency and comfort with online training, assessed via a single-item overall computer proficiency rating (6-point scale from 'unfamiliar' to 'expert') and a 6-item e-learning comfort measure covering navigating online courses, engaging with video content, completing interactive activities, troubleshooting technical problems, and preference for online versus in-person training, rated 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). The e-learning comfort score is the mean of its 6 items, with higher scores indicating greater comfort. |
| Other | Student Satisfaction With and Perceived Learning From the MPC Program | Immediately after the final Making Proud Choices! session (post only) | Student-reported satisfaction with the Making Proud Choices! program they received, assessed via a 5-item study survey. |
| Other | Student Perceptions of the Educator Who Delivered MPC | Immediately after the final Making Proud Choices! session (post only) | Student ratings of the educator who delivered Making Proud Choices!, assessed via a 5-item study survey covering clarity, respect, honesty, comfort with the material, and engagement, each rated 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). Score is the mean of the 5 items (range 1-5), with higher scores indicating more favorable perceptions of the educator. Collected only at the post-survey, from students in the Student Outcomes Sub-Study. |
| Other | Student-Perceived Classroom Climate and Psychological Safety During MPC | Immediately after the final Making Proud Choices! session (post only) | Student-perceived classroom climate during Making Proud Choices! instruction, assessed via a 5-item study survey covering felt safety, honesty in discussion, peer respect, comfort asking questions (including about sensitive topics), and privacy, each rated 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). Score is the mean of the 5 items (range 1-5), with higher scores indicating a more positive and psychologically safe classroom climate. Collected only at the post-survey, from students in the Student Outcomes Sub-Study. |
Source ClinicalTrials.govtrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0
Sources 3
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
- ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
- NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
- ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
- NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)
ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.
For software
Read this list from software.
Twenty rows a page, as JSON. No key.
GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT07880912/registered