ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT07882979

Applying Comfort Theory to an AI-Assisted Group Music Intervention: Psychosocial and Physiological Outcomes and Feasibility in Long-Term Care Residents.

NCT07882979, Not applicable, Not yet recruiting, Yu Chia Chang

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Applying Comfort Theory to an AI-Assisted Group Music Intervention: Psychosocial and Physiological Outcomes and Feasibility in Long-Term Care Residents. Trials, record NCT07882979. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT07882979

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Applying Comfort Theory to an AI-Assisted Group Music Intervention: Psychosocial and Physiological Outcomes and Feasibility in Long-Term Care Residents.
NCT number
NCT07882979
Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Not applicable
Enrollment
60 participants, estimated
Lead sponsor
Yu Chia Chang
Conditions
Comfort Theory, AI-Assisted Group Music Intervention, Long-Term Care Residents, Loneliness, Anxiety, Depression
Interventions
Group music intervention, AI-assisted monitoring system
First posted
2026-10-20
Last updated
2026-10-20

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes4

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryUCLA Loneliness Scale, Version 3T0 (pre-intervention): before the first group music session (week 1); T1 (post-intervention): after completion of the sixth group music session (week 6)
A 20-item self-report scale rated on a 4-point Likert scale (1 = never to 4 = always). Total scores range from 20 to 80, with higher scores indicating greater loneliness. The score ranges are defined as follows: 20-34 points for low loneliness, 35-49 points for moderate loneliness, 50-64 points for high loneliness, and 65-80 points for severe loneliness.
PrimaryChinese version of Beck Anxiety InventoryT0 (pre-intervention): before the first group music session (week 1); T1 (post-intervention): after completion of the sixth group music session (week 6) Measured in Stage 1 and 2 participantsA 21-item scale with each item scored from 0 (not at all) to 3 (severely). Total scores range from 0 to 63, with higher scores indicating more severe anxiety.
PrimaryGeriatric Depression Scale-15T0 (pre-intervention): before the first group music session (week 1); T1 (post-intervention): after completion of the sixth group music session (week 6) Measured in Stage 1 and 2 participantsA 15-item yes/no scale. Total scores range from 0 to 15, with higher scores indicating more depressive symptoms. Administered with the help of trained research staff.
SecondaryHeart Rate VariabilityT0 (pre-intervention): before the first group music session (week 1); T1 (post-intervention): after completion of the sixth group music session (week 6) Measured in Stage 2 participants only.
Resting HRV is recorded with an eSense HRV recorder (500 Hz sampling rate) during a 5-minute seated recording after 5 minutes of seated rest, under similar posture, time of day, and environment at both time points. Time-domain parameters (SDNN and RMSSD, ms) and frequency-domain parameters (LF and HF power, ms², and LF/HF ratio) are calculated from RR intervals.

Outcomes0

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

None in this release.

Results by group0

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

None in this release.

Participant flow0

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

None in this release.

Adverse events0

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

None in this release.

Adverse event totals0

The totals the trial posted for each group.

None in this release.

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT07882979

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT07882979/registered