ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT07884396

Dynamic Versus Traditional Core Strengthening Exercises in Patients With Chronic Non-specific Low Back Pain

NCT07884396, Not applicable, Completed, University of Lahore

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Dynamic Versus Traditional Core Strengthening Exercises in Patients With Chronic Non-specific Low Back Pain. Trials, record NCT07884396. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT07884396

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Dynamic Versus Traditional Core Strengthening Exercises in Patients With Chronic Non-specific Low Back Pain
NCT number
NCT07884396
Status
Completed
Phases
Not applicable
Enrollment
70 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
University of Lahore
Conditions
Chronic Non-Specific Low Back Pain
Interventions
Routine Physiotherapy, Dynamic Core Strengthening Exercises, Traditional Core Strengthening Exercises
First posted
2026-10-20
Last updated
2026-10-20

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes3

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryVisual Analog ScaleBaseline and week 8
Pain intensity was scaled using a 10-centimeter Visual Analog Scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (extreme pain). Pain is linearly proportional to pain score, and so, change from baseline was assessed for week 8, and a pain score move in the direction of decreasing pain was considered a clinically significant score change in the direction of decreasing pain if the score decreased by at least 2 centimeters to the left on the scale.
PrimaryRoland-Morris disability questionnaireBaseline and week 8
The 24-item Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire was used for the evaluation of back-related disability with a score ranging from 0 to 24 with 24 indicating the highest disability. Roland-Morris scores from baseline to week 8 were analyzed for this study. It was determined a decrease of 3.5 or more points was clinically significant.
PrimaryProne instability testBaseline and week 8
Results were positive for lumbar instability or negative for lumbar stability based on the Prone Instability Test. Progressive changes in lumbar stability by way of test results taken at baseline and again at 8 weeks were examined.

Outcomes0

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

None in this release.

Results by group0

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

None in this release.

Participant flow0

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

None in this release.

Adverse events0

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

None in this release.

Adverse event totals0

The totals the trial posted for each group.

None in this release.

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT07884396

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT07884396/registered