ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT07885254

Testing a Smartphone App to Support a Mediterranean Diet and Strength Exercise

NCT07885254, Not applicable, Not yet recruiting, Liverpool John Moores University

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Testing a Smartphone App to Support a Mediterranean Diet and Strength Exercise. Trials, record NCT07885254. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT07885254

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Testing a Smartphone App to Support a Mediterranean Diet and Strength Exercise
NCT number
NCT07885254
Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Not applicable
Enrollment
30 participants, estimated
Lead sponsor
Liverpool John Moores University
Conditions
Treatment Adherence and Compliance, Resistance Exercise, Mediterranean Diet, Healthy Volunteers
Interventions
MedEx Tracker, Printed dietary and resistance exercise programme
First posted
2026-10-21
Last updated
2026-11-06

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes10

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryMediterranean diet adherenceBaseline and week 4Adherence measured using the 14-item Mediterranean Diet Adherence Screener (MEDAS). Total score ranges from 0 to 14, with higher scores indicating greater adherence
PrimaryResistance exercise adherenceBaseline and week 4
Weekly muscle-strengthening exercise frequency, self-reported using the long form of the Muscle-Strengthening Exercise Questionnaire (MSEQ). Reported in days per week (minimum 0, maximum 7); higher values indicate more frequent muscle-strengthening exercise, i.e. greater adherence. This is a frequency count rather than a scale score; the MSEQ has no composite total score. Total weekly frequency is taken as the highest frequency reported across the four MSEQ exercise types.
PrimaryApplication usabilityWeek 4 (end of intervention)Usability assessed in the intervention group using the Mobile App Usability Questionnaire (MAUQ). Higher scores indicate better usability.
PrimaryApplication quality and acceptabilityWeek 4 (end of intervention)
Assessed in the intervention group using the user version of the Mobile Application Rating Scale (uMARS), scored across engagement, functionality, aesthetics and information quality. Scoring is 1-5 (higher= better).
PrimaryEngagement with the applicationWeeks 1-4, recorded continuously by the applicationFrequency of application access and completeness of dietary and resistance training records, derived from application-generated data in the intervention group.
SecondaryDietary intakeBaseline and week 4Energy and macronutrient intake derived from three-day food records.
SecondaryBody massBaseline and week 4In kg using calibrated scales
SecondaryBody compositionBaseline and week 4Fat mass and fat-free mass assessed by bioelectrical impedance analysis
SecondaryRecruitment rateFrom the start of recruitment to randomisation of the final participant (up to approximately 4 months)
Number of participants randomised per month of recruitment. Also reported: * number screened * proportion of those screened who are eligible * proportion of eligible people who consent and are randomised
SecondaryRetention rateBaseline to week 4 (end of intervention)Proportion of randomised participants who attend the week-4 follow-up visit, reported overall and by arm, with reasons for withdrawal where given.

Outcomes0

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

None in this release.

Results by group0

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

None in this release.

Participant flow0

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

None in this release.

Adverse events0

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

None in this release.

Adverse event totals0

The totals the trial posted for each group.

None in this release.

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT07885254

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT07885254/registered