Trial · NCT07885644
Gamified Versus Regular Exercise Snacks on Stationary Bikes, as One 10-Minute or Two 5-Minute Sessions a Day, for Children in an Inclusive Primary School
NCT07885644, Not applicable, Not yet recruiting, Macao Polytechnic University
3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0
Cite this record
ConductScience Library. Gamified Versus Regular Exercise Snacks on Stationary Bikes, as One 10-Minute or Two 5-Minute Sessions a Day, for Children in an Inclusive Primary School. Trials, record NCT07885644. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT07885644
On this page
Trial
As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.
- Title
- Gamified Versus Regular Exercise Snacks on Stationary Bikes, as One 10-Minute or Two 5-Minute Sessions a Day, for Children in an Inclusive Primary School
- NCT number
- NCT07885644
- Status
- Not yet recruiting
- Phases
- Not applicable
- Enrollment
- 48 participants, estimated
- Lead sponsor
- Macao Polytechnic University
- Conditions
- Exercise, Sedentary Behavior, Child Behavior, Special Needs Children
- Interventions
- Stationary cycling with game display, Stationary cycling with regular display, One 10-minute ride per riding day, Two 5-minute rides per riding day
- First posted
- 2026-10-21
- Last updated
- 2026-10-21
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Registered outcomes16
Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.
| List | Outcome | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Distance per scheduled minute (km/min) recorded by the stationary-bike software on each riding day | Up to 8 weeks | Sum of distance (km) recorded across all study rides on a scheduled riding day, divided by the 10-minute daily budget. Both displays run the same virtual track so the distance algorithm is identical. Refused rides scored 0; days not offered or absent excluded from the denominator; lost measurements treated as missing. Higher values indicate more riding output. |
| Secondary | Mean heart rate (beats per minute) in the last 60 seconds of each ride, measured by an arm-worn optical heart-rate sensor | Up to 8 weeks | Mean of sensor readings over the final 60 s, also as % of age-predicted maximum (208 - 0.7 × age). Rides included only if sensor coverage ≥ 80% with no gap \> 60 s. Higher values indicate higher intensity. |
| Secondary | Minutes per riding day in the target heart-rate zone, measured by an arm-worn optical heart-rate sensor | Up to 8 weeks | Minutes with heart rate between 60% and 80% of age-predicted maximum, summed across rides on a riding day; range 0-10. Used to compare received intensity between one 10-min ride and two 5-min rides. |
| Secondary | Affect during the ride, measured by the Feeling Scale | Up to 8 weeks | Single-item Feeling Scale (Hardy \& Rejeski, 1989), -5 (very bad) to +5 (very good), reported by pointing to a pictorial card at minute 5 of a 10-min ride and minute 2.5 of each 5-min ride. Higher scores indicate more positive affect. |
| Secondary | Affect after the ride, measured by the Feeling Scale | Up to 8 weeks | Single-item Feeling Scale, -5 (very bad) to +5 (very good), completed privately on a tablet. Higher scores indicate more positive affect. |
| Secondary | Post-ride enjoyment score on a study-specific 0-10 numeric rating item | Up to 8 weeks | "How much did you like this ride", 0 (not at all) to 10 (very much). Higher scores indicate greater enjoyment. |
| Secondary | Perceived exertion after the ride, measured by the OMNI Bike Scale for children | Up to 8 weeks | Perceived exertion is assessed within 5 minutes after each ride using the OMNI Bike Scale for children (Robertson et al., 2000), a pictorial 0-10 scale showing a child cycling up an increasingly steep hill. Scores range from 0 (extremely easy) to 10 (extremely hard). Higher scores indicate greater perceived exertion. The scale is presented on a tablet with the standard pictorial anchors and Chinese translations of the verbal anchors; children respond by pointing or tapping, with the item read aloud by study staff if needed. |
| Secondary | Perceived competence and perceived pressure scores on two study-specific 0-10 numeric rating items | Up to 8 weeks | Competence: "How well did you ride today", 0-10, higher = greater competence. Pressure: "Did you feel pushed to ride", 0-10, higher = greater pressure. Reported separately. |
| Secondary | Proportion of intervals on-task in a 20-minute classroom window after riding, measured by momentary time sampling by blinded observers | Up to 8 weeks | Proportion (0-1) of 10-s intervals coded on-task in the classroom window beginning at 14:05 on each riding day, and at 10:40 on two-ride days, for riders who rode that day and their waitlist classmates. Fixed observer pool unaware of allocation and display; 20% of windows double-coded. Higher = more on-task. |
| Secondary | Percentage of scheduled riding opportunities offered, attended, refused, stopped early and completed, from the study attendance log | Up to 8 weeks | Offered and attended use all scheduled opportunities as denominator; refused, stopped early and completed use offered-and-present opportunities. Unit: %. |
1 to 10 of 16Source ClinicalTrials.gov
See all 16 registered outcomesOutcomes0
Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.
None in this release.
Results by group0
Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.
None in this release.
Participant flow0
How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.
None in this release.
Adverse events0
Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.
None in this release.
Adverse event totals0
The totals the trial posted for each group.
None in this release.
Papers0
The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.
None in this release.
Grants0
The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.
None in this release.
Trial comparisons0
Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.
None in this release.
Tests1
The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.
| Test | Named as |
|---|---|
| Eriksen Flanker Task | Secondary outcome |
Source ConductCognition
Data dates
The day each source was copied for this release.
Sources 3
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
- ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
- NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
- ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
- NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)
ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.
For software
Read this trial from software.
The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.
GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT07885644
GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT07885644/registered