Trial · NCT07887711
Comparative Study Between Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation and Post-facilitation Stretching in Text Neck Syndrome
NCT07887711, Not applicable, Not yet recruiting, Cairo University
3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0
Cite this record
ConductScience Library. Comparative Study Between Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation and Post-facilitation Stretching in Text Neck Syndrome. Trials, record NCT07887711. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT07887711
On this page
Trial
As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.
- Title
- Comparative Study Between Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation and Post-facilitation Stretching in Text Neck Syndrome
- NCT number
- NCT07887711
- Status
- Not yet recruiting
- Phases
- Not applicable
- Enrollment
- 51 participants, estimated
- Lead sponsor
- Cairo University
- Conditions
- Text Neck Syndrome
- Interventions
- Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation, Post-facilitation Stretching, traditional treatment
- First posted
- 2026-10-21
- Last updated
- 2026-10-21
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Registered outcomes4
Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.
| List | Outcome | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | craniovertebral angle | up to four weeks | craniovertebral angle will be measured by lateral photographe.A lateral photograph is taken at the level of the participant's shoulder using a digital camera placed at a fixed distance.The anatomical landmarks (tragus of the ear and C7 spinous process) are identified and marked either physically or digitally using posture analysis software.The craniovertebral angle is calculated as the angle between:A horizontal line passing through C7, andA line connecting C7 to the tragus.CVA \< 48-50°: Indicates forward head posture (FHP),CVA ≥ 50°: Suggests a normal or neutral head posture. |
| Primary | cervical range of motion | up to four weeks | cervical range of motion will be measured by cervical range of motion device |
| Secondary | pain intesinty | up to four weeks | Pain intensity will be assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). The VAS is a 10-centimeter horizontal line anchored by two descriptors: "no pain" (0) and "worst pain imaginable" (10). Each participant will be instructed to place a vertical mark along the line indicating the intensity of their pain. The distance (in cm) from the "no pain" anchor to the participant's mark will be measured and recorded as the pain score ( |
| Secondary | neck disability | up to four weeks | The Neck Disability Index (NDI) is the most widely used and validated self-report questionnaire for assessing neck pain-related disability.Questions include activities of daily living, such as: personal care, lifting, reading, work, driving, sleeping, recreational activities, pain intensity, concentration and headache. Each question is measured on a scale from 0 (no disability) to 5.The total score will be obtained by summing the item scores, yielding a total range from 0 to 50. |
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Outcomes0
Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.
None in this release.
Results by group0
Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.
None in this release.
Participant flow0
How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.
None in this release.
Adverse events0
Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.
None in this release.
Adverse event totals0
The totals the trial posted for each group.
None in this release.
Papers0
The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.
None in this release.
Grants0
The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.
None in this release.
Trial comparisons0
Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.
None in this release.
Tests0
The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.
None in this release.
Data dates
The day each source was copied for this release.
Sources 3
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
- ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
- NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
- ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
- NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)
ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.
For software
Read this trial from software.
The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.
GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT07887711
GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT07887711/registered