ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT07887880

Registered outcomes22

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryUpper Extremity Fugl-Meyer Scale6-9 weeks post-intervention
Changes in Upper Extremity Fugl-Meyer between the experimental (tRNS and FES-assisted task-specific practice) and control (sham-tRNS and FES-assisted task-specific practice) conditions. This scale measures voluntary motor control of the paretic upper extremity (UE) using a 3-point ordinal scale where 0=cannot perform, 1=performs partially, and 2=performs fully. The total possible score ranges from 0-66 with higher scores indicating a better voluntary motor control of the paretic UE.
PrimaryStroke Impact Scale - Hand Function Score6-9 weeks post-intervention
Changes in Stroke Impact Scale - Hand Function Score between the experimental (tRNS and FES-assisted task-specific practice) and control (sham-tRNS and FES-assisted task-specific practice) conditions. Participants report paretic upper extremity (UE) use in five commonly performed daily tasks (e.g., carry a bag of groceries) using a 5-point ordinal scale, which ranges from 0-5, where 0=cannot use paretic and 5=not difficult at all to use paretic UE. The total score ranges from 0-25 with higher scores indicating better UE function.
PrimaryTranscranial Magnetic stimulation-induced motor evoked potential6-9 weeks post-intervention
Changes in cortical motor evoked potentials (MEPs) between the experimental (tRNS and FES-assisted task-specific practice) and control (sham-tRNS and FES-assisted task-specific practice) conditions. MEPs will be obtained by placing a transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) coil over the hand knob of the ipsilesional primary motor cortex. TMS-induced MEP amplitude will be obtained by averaging peak to peak amplitudes of 20 MEPs from the flexor carpii radials and/or extensor digitorum communis muscles. Higher values of MEP indicate greater corticospinal excitability.
SecondaryUpper Extremity Fugl-Meyer Scale12-14 weeks post intervention
Changes in Upper Extremity Fugl-Meyer between the experimental (tRNS and FES-assisted task-specific practice) and control (sham-tRNS and FES-assisted task-specific practice) conditions. This scale measures voluntary motor control of the paretic upper extremity (UE) using a 3-point ordinal scale where 0=cannot perform, 1=performs partially, and 2=performs fully. The total possible score ranges from 0-66 with higher scores indicating a better voluntary motor control of the paretic UE.
SecondaryStroke Impact Scale - Hand Function Score12-14 weeks post intervention
Changes in Stroke Impact Scale - Hand Function Score between the experimental (tRNS and FES-assisted task-specific practice) and control (sham-tRNS and FES-assisted task-specific practice) conditions. Participants report paretic upper extremity (UE) use in five commonly performed daily tasks (e.g., carry a bag of groceries) using a 5-point ordinal scale, which ranges from 0-5, where 0=cannot use paretic and 5=not difficult at all to use paretic UE. The total score ranges from 0-25 with higher scores indicating better UE function.
SecondaryTranscranial Magnetic stimulation-induced motor evoked potential12-14 weeks post intervention
Changes in cortical motor evoked potentials (MEPs) between the experimental (tRNS and FES-assisted task-specific practice) and control (sham-tRNS and FES-assisted task-specific practice) conditions. MEPs will be obtained by placing a transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) coil over the hand knob of the ipsilesional primary motor cortex. TMS-induced MEP amplitude will be obtained by averaging peak to peak amplitudes of 20 MEPs from the flexor carpii radials and/or extensor digitorum communis muscles. Higher values of MEP indicate greater corticospinal excitability.
OtherGrip Strength of the paretic hand6-9 weeks Post-intervention
Changes in Grip Strength between the experimental (tRNS and FES-assisted task-specific practice) and control (sham-tRNS and FES-assisted task-specific practice) conditions. Average grip strength of the of three trials will be reported in kilograms. Higher values indicate better grip strength.
OtherGrip Strength of the paretic hand12 -14 weeks Post-intervention
Changes in Grip Strength between the experimental (tRNS and FES-assisted task-specific practice) and control (sham-tRNS and FES-assisted task-specific practice) conditions. Average grip strength of the of three trials will be reported in kilograms. Higher values indicate better grip strength.
OtherUpper extremity muscle synergy6-9 weeks Post-intervention
Changes in upper extremity muscle synergy between the experimental (tRNS and FES-assisted task-specific practice) and control (sham-tRNS and FES-assisted task-specific practice) conditions. Transcranial magnetic stimulation induced motor evoked potentials of different proximal and distal upper extremity muscles are coupled using the synergy weights and activation profiles obtained with a novel Principal component-based motor evoked potential analyses. Higher values suggest better muscle synergy.
OtherUpper extremity muscle synergy12-14 weeks Post-intervention
Changes in upper extremity muscle synergy between the experimental (tRNS and FES-assisted task-specific practice) and control (sham-tRNS and FES-assisted task-specific practice) conditions. Transcranial magnetic stimulation induced motor evoked potentials of different proximal and distal upper extremity muscles are coupled using the synergy weights and activation profiles obtained with a novel Principal component-based motor evoked potential analyses. Higher values suggest better muscle synergy.
OtherUpper Extremity range of motion via kinematics6-9 weeks Post-intervention
Changes in Upper Extremity kinematics between the experimental (tRNS and FES-assisted task-specific practice) and control (sham-tRNS and FES-assisted task-specific practice) conditions. 3D biomechanical data will be collected using a motion capture system. We will evaluate maximum finger excursions. Higher values indicate greater finger excursion.
OtherUpper Extremity range of motion via kinematics12-14 weeks Post-intervention
Changes in Upper Extremity kinematics between the experimental (tRNS and FES-assisted task-specific practice) and control (sham-tRNS and FES-assisted task-specific practice) conditions. 3D biomechanical data will be collected using a motion capture system. We will evaluate maximum finger excursions. Higher values indicate greater finger excursion.
OtherMuscle strength and activation6-9 weeks Post-intervention
Changes in muscle strength and activation between the experimental (tRNS and FES-assisted task-specific practice) and control (sham-tRNS and FES-assisted task-specific practice) conditions. Muscle strength and activation testing will be performed using the triple interpolated twitch technique for the paretic wrist and hand muscles. We will test muscle strength and activation using a customized set-up with load cells for the wrist and hand. Normalized peak force/torque will be used to calculate strength and activation. Higher values indicate greater muscle strength and activation.
OtherMuscle strength and activation12-14 weeks Post-intervention
Changes in muscle strength and activation between the experimental (tRNS and FES-assisted task-specific practice) and control (sham-tRNS and FES-assisted task-specific practice) conditions. Muscle strength and activation testing will be performed using the triple interpolated twitch technique for the paretic wrist and hand muscles. We will test muscle strength and activation using a customized set-up with load cells for the wrist and hand. Normalized peak force/torque will be used to calculate strength and activation. Higher values indicate greater muscle strength and activation.
OtherAction Research Arm Test6-9 weeks Post-intervention
Changes in Action Research Arm Test between the experimental (tRNS and FES-assisted task-specific practice) and control (sham-tRNS and FES-assisted task-specific practice) conditions. Action Research Arm Test evaluates upper extremity (UE) functional performance using a 4-point ordinal scale on 19-items, which are divided into 4 sub-tests (grasp, grip, pinch, and gross arm movement). The total possible score ranges from 0-57 with higher scores indicating higher UE function.
OtherAction Research Arm Test12-14 weeks Post-intervention
Changes in Action Research Arm Test between the experimental (tRNS and FES-assisted task-specific practice) and control (sham-tRNS and FES-assisted task-specific practice) conditions. Action Research Arm Test evaluates upper extremity (UE) functional performance using a 4-point ordinal scale on 19-items, which are divided into 4 sub-tests (grasp, grip, pinch, and gross arm movement). The total possible score ranges from 0-57 with higher scores indicating higher UE function.
OtherSocial role sub-scale of Assessment of Life Habits6-9 weeks Post-intervention
Changes in Social role sub-scale of Assessment of Life Habits between the experimental (tRNS and FES-assisted task-specific practice) and control (sham-tRNS and FES-assisted task-specific practice) conditions. The Social-LIFE-H assess the quality of social participation by estimating the perceived difficulty an in-dividual faces in performing a life habit and the type of assistance required to perform it. Using 40 items, the sub-scale assesses restrictions in social responsibilities, interpersonal relationships, community life, education, employment, and leisure. Each item is scored using a 10-point ordinal scale, which ranges from 0-9, where 0 = not able to perform and 9 = able to perform without difficulty with higher scores indicating better social participation. The total possible score will be reported, which is obtained by summing the scores on each item and then dividing by the number of items.
OtherSocial role sub-scale of Assessment of Life Habits12-14 weeks Post-intervention
Changes in Social role sub-scale of Assessment of Life Habits between the experimental (tRNS and FES-assisted task-specific practice) and control (sham-tRNS and FES-assisted task-specific practice) conditions. The Social-LIFE-H assess the quality of social participation by estimating the perceived difficulty an in-dividual faces in performing a life habit and the type of assistance required to perform it. Using 40 items, the sub-scale assesses restrictions in social responsibilities, interpersonal relationships, community life, education, employment, and leisure. Each item is scored using a 10-point ordinal scale, which ranges from 0-9, where 0 = not able to perform and 9 = able to perform without difficulty with higher scores indicating better social participation. The total possible score will be reported, which is obtained by summing the scores on each item and then dividing by the number of items.
OtherTranscranial magnetic stimulation induced cervicomedullary motor evoked potential6-9 weeks Post-intervention
Changes in transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) induced cervicomedullary motor evoked potential (CMEP) between the experimental (tRNS and FES-assisted task-specific practice) and control (sham-tRNS and FES-assisted task-specific practice) conditions. An average peak to peak amplitudes of 20 CMEPs will be reported from the flexor carpii radials and/or extensor digitorum communis muscles. Higher values of CMEP indicate greater spinal excitability.
OtherTranscranial magnetic stimulation induced cervicomedullary motor evoked potential12-14 weeks Post-intervention
Changes in transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) induced cervicomedullary motor evoked potential (CMEP) between the experimental (tRNS and FES-assisted task-specific practice) and control (sham-tRNS and FES-assisted task-specific practice) conditions. An average peak to peak amplitudes of 20 CMEPs will be reported from the flexor carpii radials and/or extensor digitorum communis muscles. Higher values of CMEP indicate greater spinal excitability.

Source ClinicalTrials.govtrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this list from software.

Twenty rows a page, as JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT07887880/registered