ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT07888231

Effects of Different Anchorage Methods and Low-Level Laser Therapy in Power Bar Distalization

NCT07888231, Not applicable, Completed, TC Erciyes University

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Effects of Different Anchorage Methods and Low-Level Laser Therapy in Power Bar Distalization. Trials, record NCT07888231. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT07888231

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Effects of Different Anchorage Methods and Low-Level Laser Therapy in Power Bar Distalization
NCT number
NCT07888231
Status
Completed
Phases
Not applicable
Enrollment
57 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
TC Erciyes University
Conditions
Class II Malocclusion
Interventions
Power Bar Distalization Appliance, Mandibular Miniscrew Anchorage, Mandibular Orthodontic Button Anchorage, Lingual Arch Anchorage Group, Low-Level Laser Therapy
First posted
2026-10-22
Last updated
2026-10-22

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes8

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryChange in Maxillary First Molar DistalizationBaseline (before treatment) and completion of the distalization phase (mean 6.5 months after baseline).
The amount of distal movement of the maxillary first molars (U6) was assessed using digital dental models obtained before treatment (T0) and after completion of the distalization phase (T1). The change in molar position was measured in millimeters and compared among the miniscrew, orthodontic button, lingual arch, and control groups. In the active treatment groups, laser-treated and non-laser-treated sides were also compared according to the split-mouth design.
SecondaryChange in Maxillary Tooth DistalizationBaseline (before treatment) and completion of the distalization phase (mean 6.5 months after baseline).
The distal movement of the maxillary canine, premolars, and second molar (U3, U4, U5, and U7) was measured on digital dental models obtained at baseline (T0) and after completion of the distalization phase (T1). Changes were recorded in millimeters and compared among the miniscrew, orthodontic button, lingual arch, and control groups. In the active treatment groups, the laser-treated and non-laser-treated sides were also compared.
SecondaryChange in Maxillary Tooth RotationBaseline (before treatment) and completion of the distalization phase (mean 6.5 months after baseline).
Rotational changes of the maxillary teeth (U3-U7) were evaluated on digital dental models obtained at T0 and T1. Rotation was measured in degrees. Changes were compared among the study groups and, in the active treatment groups, between the laser-treated and non-laser-treated sides.
SecondaryChange in Maxillary Tooth Mesiodistal TippingBaseline (before treatment) and completion of the distalization phase (mean 6.5 months after baseline).
Changes in the mesiodistal angulation of the maxillary teeth (U3-U7) were assessed using digital dental models obtained at T0 and T1. Tipping changes were expressed in degrees and compared among the four study groups. Side-specific comparisons were also performed between laser-treated and non-laser-treated sides in the active treatment groups.
SecondaryChange in Transverse Dental MeasurementsBaseline (before treatment) and completion of the distalization phase (mean 6.5 months after baseline).
Transverse positional changes of the maxillary teeth were assessed on digital dental models obtained before treatment and after the distalization phase. Changes in transverse dental measurements were recorded in millimeters and compared among the miniscrew, orthodontic button, lingual arch, and control groups.
SecondaryChange in Cephalometric Skeletal and Dentoalveolar MeasurementsBaseline (before treatment) and completion of the distalization phase (mean 6.5 months after baseline).
Skeletal and dentoalveolar changes were evaluated using lateral cephalometric records obtained at T0 and T1. Measurements included sagittal and vertical skeletal relationships, incisor and molar positions and inclinations, and overjet and overbite. Changes were compared among the miniscrew, orthodontic button, lingual arch, and control groups.
SecondaryChange in Tooth Position Relative to the Third Palatal RugaBaseline (before treatment) and completion of the distalization phase (mean 6.5 months after baseline).
Positional changes of selected maxillary teeth relative to the third palatal ruga reference line were evaluated on digital dental models obtained at T0 and T1. Changes were measured in millimeters to assess anteroposterior tooth movement during the distalization period.
SecondaryChange in Soft Tissue MeasurementsBaseline (before treatment) and completion of the distalization phase (mean 6.5 months after baseline).
Soft tissue changes were assessed by comparing facial soft tissue records obtained before treatment (T0) and after completion of the distalization phase (T1). Changes in the evaluated soft tissue parameters were compared among the four study groups to determine the effects associated with the different anchorage methods.

Outcomes0

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

None in this release.

Results by group0

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

None in this release.

Participant flow0

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

None in this release.

Adverse events0

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

None in this release.

Adverse event totals0

The totals the trial posted for each group.

None in this release.

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT07888231

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT07888231/registered