ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT07889024

Registered outcomes18

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryRecruitment rateRecruitment period (approximately 2 weeks, before randomisation)
Number of participants recruited per month and proportion of the target sample (30-40 participants) recruited within the planned recruitment period. Pre-specified feasibility success criterion: \>=75% of the target sample recruited. Participant flow will be reported in a CONSORT 2025 flow diagram, adapted according to the CONSORT extension for pilot and feasibility trials.
PrimaryEligibility and consent ratesRecruitment period (approximately 2 weeks, before randomisation)
Proportion of screened individuals who are eligible, and proportion of eligible individuals who consent to participate and are randomised (%, with 95% confidence intervals). Reasons for ineligibility and refusal will be recorded.
PrimaryAdherence to the interventionDuring the 12-week intervention period
Percentage of scheduled sessions attended (36 exercise sessions and 12 education sessions), per participant and overall, in the intervention group. Pre-specified feasibility success criterion: mean attendance \>=70% of sessions.
PrimaryRetentionFrom randomisation to post-intervention assessment (approximately 16 weeks, including a 2-week holiday break)
Proportion of randomised participants who complete the post-intervention assessment, and proportion of dropouts with reasons, in each group. Pre-specified feasibility success criterion: retention \>=80%.
PrimarySafety: adverse eventsFrom the start of the intervention to post-intervention assessment (approximately 16 weeks)
Number, type and severity of adverse events, reported as counts and rates per participant and per session, recorded in a structured safety log. Pre-specified success criterion: no serious intervention-related adverse events.
PrimaryAcceptability: Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Post-intervention (within 2 weeks after completion of the 12-week intervention)
Participant-rated global impression of change in pain and function attributable to the exercise programme on the 7-point PGIC (Portuguese version; 1 = no change/worse to 7 = a great deal better), complemented by a brief study-specific satisfaction and acceptability questionnaire on the programme components.
SecondaryChange in functional mobility: Timed Up and Go (TUG)Baseline (before randomisation) and post-intervention (within 2 weeks after completion of the 12-week intervention)Time (seconds) to rise from a chair, walk 3 m, turn 180 degrees, walk back and sit down. Lower values indicate better mobility.
SecondaryChange in dual-task mobility: TUG with cognitive task (TUG-DT) and dual-task costBaseline (before randomisation) and post-intervention (within 2 weeks after completion of the 12-week intervention)
TUG performed while serially subtracting 3 from a 3-digit number between 300 and 400 (seconds). Dual-task cost (%) = \[(TUG-DT - TUG single task) / TUG single task\] x 100; higher positive values indicate greater cognitive-motor interference.
SecondaryChange in lower-limb function: 30-second Chair Stand TestBaseline (before randomisation) and post-intervention (within 2 weeks after completion of the 12-week intervention)Number of complete sit-to-stand repetitions in 30 seconds. Higher values indicate better lower-limb function.
SecondaryChange in balance: Mini-BESTestBaseline (before randomisation) and post-intervention (within 2 weeks after completion of the 12-week intervention)European Portuguese Mini-BESTest, 14 items (anticipatory postural adjustments, reactive postural control, sensory orientation, dynamic gait), total score 0-28. Higher scores indicate better balance.
SecondaryChange in knee extensor and flexor muscle strength (isokinetic dynamometry)Baseline (before randomisation) and post-intervention (within 2 weeks after completion of the 12-week intervention)
Concentric peak torque (Nm), peak torque normalised to body mass (Nm/kg) and flexor/extensor ratio of the knee extensors and flexors at 60 deg/s and 180 deg/s, measured with a HUMAC NORM isokinetic dynamometer (CSMi).
SecondaryChange in pain intensity: Brief Pain Inventory - Short Form (BPI-SF)Baseline (before randomisation) and post-intervention (within 2 weeks after completion of the 12-week intervention)Portuguese BPI-SF pain severity score: mean of 4 items (worst, least, average and current pain), each rated 0-10. Higher scores indicate more severe pain.
SecondaryChange in pain interference: Brief Pain Inventory - Short Form (BPI-SF)Baseline (before randomisation) and post-intervention (within 2 weeks after completion of the 12-week intervention)
Portuguese BPI-SF pain interference score: mean of 7 items (general activity, mood, walking, normal work, relations with others, sleep, enjoyment of life), each rated 0-10. Higher scores indicate greater interference.
SecondaryChange in fear of falling: Short Falls Efficacy Scale-International (Short FES-I)Baseline (before randomisation) and post-intervention (within 2 weeks after completion of the 12-week intervention)European Portuguese Short FES-I, 7 items rated 1-4, total score 7-28. Higher scores indicate greater concern about falling.
SecondaryChange in kinesiophobia: Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK-13)Baseline (before randomisation) and post-intervention (within 2 weeks after completion of the 12-week intervention)Portuguese 13-item TSK, each item rated on a 4-point Likert scale, total score 13-52. Higher scores indicate greater fear of movement/(re)injury.
SecondaryChange in health-related quality of life: WHOQOL-BREFBaseline (before randomisation) and post-intervention (within 2 weeks after completion of the 12-week intervention)
European Portuguese WHOQOL-BREF, 26 items rated on 5-point Likert scales; scores for the physical, psychological, social relationships and environment domains and 2 general items. Higher scores indicate better perceived quality of life.
OtherProgression level achieved in the dual-task training blockDuring the 12-week intervention periodHighest progression phase achieved (phase 1, 2 or 3) and modifications made, recorded by instructors on a standardised form for each participant in the intervention group.
OtherParticipants' perceptions of the education component (qualitative)Post-intervention (within 2 weeks after completion of the 12-week intervention)
Qualitative data from a brief group interview at the end of the intervention exploring understanding of content, perceived usefulness, applicability of self-management strategies and satisfaction with the pain science and fall-prevention education. Analysed thematically.

Source ClinicalTrials.govtrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this list from software.

Twenty rows a page, as JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT07889024/registered