Trial · NCT07891325
Generative AI-Assisted Teaching and Clinical Reasoning Among TCM Interns
NCT07891325, Not applicable, Completed, Taipei City Hospital
3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0
Cite this record
ConductScience Library. Generative AI-Assisted Teaching and Clinical Reasoning Among TCM Interns. Trials, record NCT07891325. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT07891325
On this page
Trial
As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.
- Title
- Generative AI-Assisted Teaching and Clinical Reasoning Among TCM Interns
- NCT number
- NCT07891325
- Status
- Completed
- Phases
- Not applicable
- Enrollment
- 38 participants, actual
- Lead sponsor
- Taipei City Hospital
- Conditions
- Clinical, Education
- Interventions
- GAI-Assisted Clinical Education, Conventional Clinical Education
- First posted
- 2026-10-23
- Last updated
- 2026-10-23
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Registered outcomes3
Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.
| List | Outcome | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Change in Clinical Reasoning Performance Score | Baseline (Month 0) and post-intervention (Month 3) | Clinical reasoning performance was assessed using written clinical case reports independently evaluated by two blinded traditional Chinese medicine educators. Ten domains were scored from 1 to 10, including disease location, etiology, disease nature, pathogenesis, differential diagnosis, prescription selection, pathophysiological reasoning, overall clinical decision-making, information analysis, and clinical applicability of prescriptions. Total scores ranged from 10 to 100, with higher scores indicating better clinical reasoning performance. The mean score from the two evaluators was used for analysis. Changes in scores from baseline (Month 0) to post-intervention (Month 3) were compared between groups. |
| Secondary | Change in Perceptions of the Four Elements of TCM Etiology and Pathogenesis | Baseline (Month 0) and post-intervention (Month 3) | Participants' perceptions of the four-element traditional Chinese medicine diagnostic framework were assessed using an investigator-developed 11-item questionnaire with a seven-point Likert scale. The questionnaire was administered before and after the educational intervention in both groups. Responses were collected anonymously and could not be matched at the individual level across time points. Group-level changes in questionnaire responses were evaluated. |
| Secondary | Change in Perceptions of and Satisfaction With GAI-Assisted Learning | Baseline (Month 0) and post-intervention (Month 3) | Perceptions of and satisfaction with generative AI-assisted learning were evaluated among participants in the intervention group using an investigator-developed 12-item questionnaire with a five-point Likert scale. The questionnaire was administered at baseline (Month 0) and post-intervention (Month 3). Responses were collected anonymously and could not be linked at the individual level across assessment points. Changes in questionnaire responses were therefore evaluated at the group level. |
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Outcomes0
Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.
None in this release.
Results by group0
Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.
None in this release.
Participant flow0
How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.
None in this release.
Adverse events0
Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.
None in this release.
Adverse event totals0
The totals the trial posted for each group.
None in this release.
Papers0
The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.
None in this release.
Grants0
The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.
None in this release.
Trial comparisons0
Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.
None in this release.
Tests0
The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.
None in this release.
Data dates
The day each source was copied for this release.
Sources 3
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
- ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
- NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
- ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
- NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)
ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.
For software
Read this trial from software.
The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.
GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT07891325
GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT07891325/registered