ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT07892391

Comparison of Task Trainer and Virtual Reality Approaches in Dysrhythmia Management Education

NCT07892391, Not applicable, Completed, Karadeniz Technical University

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Comparison of Task Trainer and Virtual Reality Approaches in Dysrhythmia Management Education. Trials, record NCT07892391. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT07892391

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Comparison of Task Trainer and Virtual Reality Approaches in Dysrhythmia Management Education
NCT number
NCT07892391
Status
Completed
Phases
Not applicable
Enrollment
30 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Karadeniz Technical University
Conditions
Medical Education, Emergency Medicine, High-Fidelity Simulation Training, Virtual Reality Simulation
Interventions
Virtual Reality-Based Dysrhythmia Management Training, Task Trainer-Based Dysrhythmia Management Training
First posted
2026-10-23
Last updated
2026-10-30

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes2

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryChange in Dysrhythmia Management Performance Score From Baseline to Immediate Post-TrainingBaseline and immediately after training
Dysrhythmia management performance was assessed using standardized, weighted performance checklists during high-fidelity simulation scenarios involving bradydysrhythmia, supraventricular tachycardia, and ventricular tachycardia. Participants were evaluated at baseline and immediately after completing either virtual reality-based or task trainer-based training. Performance scores were calculated using predefined weights assigned to individual checklist items. The total score ranged from 0 (minimum) to 100 (maximum), with higher scores indicating better dysrhythmia management performance. The primary outcome was the change in performance score from baseline to immediately after training, compared between the two groups.
SecondaryRetention of Dysrhythmia Management Performance at Four WeeksImmediately after training and four weeks after training
Retention of dysrhythmia management performance was assessed using standardized, weighted performance checklists during high-fidelity simulation scenarios involving bradydysrhythmia, supraventricular tachycardia, and ventricular tachycardia. Performance scores were calculated using predefined weights assigned to individual checklist items. The total score ranged from 0 (minimum) to 100 (maximum), with higher scores indicating better dysrhythmia management performance. The secondary outcome was the change in performance score from the immediate post-training assessment to the four-week follow-up assessment, compared between the virtual reality and task trainer groups.

Outcomes0

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

None in this release.

Results by group0

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

None in this release.

Participant flow0

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

None in this release.

Adverse events0

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

None in this release.

Adverse event totals0

The totals the trial posted for each group.

None in this release.

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT07892391

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT07892391/registered