Trial · NCT07893990
Comparison of Three Teaching Methods for Urinary Catheterization in Nursing Students
NCT07893990, Not applicable, Completed, Cukurova University
3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0
Cite this record
ConductScience Library. Comparison of Three Teaching Methods for Urinary Catheterization in Nursing Students. Trials, record NCT07893990. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT07893990
On this page
Trial
As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.
- Title
- Comparison of Three Teaching Methods for Urinary Catheterization in Nursing Students
- NCT number
- NCT07893990
- Status
- Completed
- Phases
- Not applicable
- Enrollment
- 112 participants, actual
- Lead sponsor
- Cukurova University
- Conditions
- Urinary Catheterization, Urinary Catheterization Skills, Nursing Students, Learning Methodology, Simulation Training
- Interventions
- Training on performing urinary catheterization using simulation
- First posted
- 2026-10-26
- Last updated
- 2026-10-26
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Registered outcomes6
Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.
| List | Outcome | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Total Score on the Turkish Instructional Materials Motivation Survey | immediately after completion of the assigned urinary catheterization simulation session and feedback. | Motivation toward the assigned urinary catheterization simulation material is assessed using the 24-item Turkish version of the Instructional Materials Motivation Survey, adapted by Kutu and Sozbilir. The total score is calculated by summing the item scores and ranges from 24 to 120. Higher scores indicate greater motivation toward the instructional material. The same instrument is administered in the low-fidelity, high-fidelity, and virtual reality simulation groups. |
| Secondary | Self-Reported Competence in Urinary Catheterization Skills | immediately after completion of the assigned urinary catheterization simulation session and feedback. | Perceived skill competence is assessed using a single question in the researcher-developed Student Information Form: "Do you consider yourself competent in performing urinary catheterization?" Response options are "Yes," "No," and "Undecided." The outcome is the percentage of participants selecting each response category in each simulation group. This measure assesses perceived competence rather than objectively observed skill performance. |
| Other | Self-Reported Competence in Theoretical Knowledge of Urinary Catheterization | immediately after completion of the assigned urinary catheterization simulation session and feedback. | Perceived theoretical knowledge competence is assessed using a single question in the researcher-developed Student Information Form: "Do you consider your theoretical knowledge of urinary catheterization adequate?" Response options are "Yes," "No," and "Undecided." The outcome is the percentage of participants selecting each response category in each simulation group. This measure assesses perceived knowledge competence rather than performance on an objective knowledge test. |
| Other | Attention-Relevance Subscale Score on the Turkish Instructional Materials Motivation Survey | immediately after completion of the assigned urinary catheterization simulation session and feedback. | Attention and perceived relevance of the assigned simulation material are assessed using the 11-item Attention-Relevance subscale of the 24-item Turkish Instructional Materials Motivation Survey. The subscale score is calculated by summing its item scores and ranges from 11 to 55. Higher scores indicate greater attention and perceived relevance. The same subscale is administered in all three simulation groups. |
| Other | Confidence-Satisfaction Subscale Score on the Turkish Instructional Materials Motivation Survey | immediately after completion of the assigned urinary catheterization simulation session and feedback. | Confidence and satisfaction related to the assigned simulation material are assessed using the 13-item Confidence-Satisfaction subscale of the 24-item Turkish Instructional Materials Motivation Survey. The subscale score is calculated by summing its item scores and ranges from 13 to 65. Higher scores indicate greater confidence and satisfaction. The same subscale is administered in all three simulation groups. |
| Other | Self-Reported Most Difficult Step in Urinary Catheterization | immediately after completion of the assigned urinary catheterization simulation session and feedback. | The most difficult procedural step is assessed using a single-choice question in the researcher-developed Student Information Form. Participants select one of seven categories: communicating with the patient, following the procedural steps in the correct order, maintaining aseptic technique, inserting the catheter appropriately, inflating the catheter balloon appropriately, checking catheter position, or securing the catheter correctly. The outcome is the percentage of participants selecting each category in each simulation group. |
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Outcomes0
Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.
None in this release.
Results by group0
Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.
None in this release.
Participant flow0
How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.
None in this release.
Adverse events0
Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.
None in this release.
Adverse event totals0
The totals the trial posted for each group.
None in this release.
Papers0
The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.
None in this release.
Grants0
The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.
None in this release.
Trial comparisons0
Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.
None in this release.
Tests0
The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.
None in this release.
Data dates
The day each source was copied for this release.
Sources 3
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
- ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
- NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
- ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
- NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)
ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.
For software
Read this trial from software.
The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.
GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT07893990
GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT07893990/registered