Trial · NCT07894159
Endoscopic Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy Versus Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion for Cervical Radiculopathy
NCT07894159, Not applicable, Not yet recruiting, Central Hospital, Nancy, France
3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0
Cite this record
ConductScience Library. Endoscopic Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy Versus Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion for Cervical Radiculopathy. Trials, record NCT07894159. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT07894159
On this page
Trial
As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.
- Title
- Endoscopic Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy Versus Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion for Cervical Radiculopathy
- NCT number
- NCT07894159
- Status
- Not yet recruiting
- Phases
- Not applicable
- Enrollment
- 46 participants, estimated
- Lead sponsor
- Central Hospital, Nancy, France
- Conditions
- Cervical Disc Herniation, Cervical Foraminal Stenosis, Cervical Radiculopathy
- Interventions
- Uniportal Endoscopic Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy, Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion
- First posted
- 2026-10-26
- Last updated
- 2026-10-26
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Registered outcomes20
Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.
| List | Outcome | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Upper Limb Radicular Pain Intensity at 3 Months After Surgery | 3 months after surgery | Upper limb radicular pain intensity will be assessed using a patient-reported 0-10 pain scale, where 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates the worst imaginable pain. Lower scores indicate less severe pain. The primary analysis will compare pain intensity between the two surgical groups at three months after surgery, adjusting for baseline preoperative pain intensity using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). The non-inferiority margin is set at 1 point on the 0-10 pain scale. Non-inferiority will be demonstrated if the upper bound of the 95% confidence interval for the adjusted mean difference (endoscopic foraminotomy minus ACDF) is below +1 point. |
| Secondary | Upper Limb Radicular Pain Intensity at 6 Weeks Measured Using an 11-Point Numerical Rating Scale (0-10) | 6 weeks after surgery | |
| Secondary | Upper Limb Radicular Pain Intensity at 6 Months Measured Using an 11-Point Numerical Rating Scale (0-10) | 6 months after surgery | |
| Secondary | Upper Limb Radicular Pain Intensity at 9 Months Measured Using an 11-Point Numerical Rating Scale (0-10) | 9 months after surgery | |
| Secondary | Upper Limb Radicular Pain Intensity at 12 Months Measured Using an 11-Point Numerical Rating Scale (0-10) | 12 months after surgery | |
| Secondary | Cervical Pain Intensity at 6 Weeks Measured Using an 11-Point Numerical Rating Scale (0-10) | 6 weeks after surgery | |
| Secondary | Cervical Pain Intensity at 3 Months Measured Using an 11-Point Numerical Rating Scale (0-10) | 3 months after surgery | |
| Secondary | Cervical Pain Intensity at 6 Months Measured Using an 11-Point Numerical Rating Scale (0-10) | 6 months after surgery | |
| Secondary | Cervical Pain Intensity at 9 Months Measured Using an 11-Point Numerical Rating Scale (0-10) | 9 months after surgery | |
| Secondary | Cervical Pain Intensity at 12 Months Measured Using an 11-Point Numerical Rating Scale (0-10) | 12 months after surgery |
1 to 10 of 20Source ClinicalTrials.gov
See all 20 registered outcomesOutcomes0
Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.
None in this release.
Results by group0
Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.
None in this release.
Participant flow0
How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.
None in this release.
Adverse events0
Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.
None in this release.
Adverse event totals0
The totals the trial posted for each group.
None in this release.
Papers0
The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.
None in this release.
Grants0
The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.
None in this release.
Trial comparisons0
Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.
None in this release.
Tests0
The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.
None in this release.
Data dates
The day each source was copied for this release.
Sources 3
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
- ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
- NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
- ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
- NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)
ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.
For software
Read this trial from software.
The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.
GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT07894159
GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT07894159/registered