ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT07895849

Registered outcomes13

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryAgreement between the OCUTOP and the reference instrument for central simulated mean keratometry (K-mean)Single study visit (Day 1)
Mean paired difference (OCUTOP minus reference, dioptres) with 95% confidence interval, and Bland-Altman 95% limits of agreement with their 95% confidence intervals, in the analysis eye, pooled across sites and by site. Reference: Pentacam HR (Site 01), Myah (Site 02).
PrimaryAgreement between the OCUTOP and the reference instrument for first non-invasive tear break-up time (NIBUT-first)Single study visit (Day 1)
Mean paired difference (OCUTOP minus reference, seconds) with 95% confidence interval, and Bland-Altman 95% limits of agreement with their 95% confidence intervals, in the analysis eye, pooled across sites and by site. Reference: Keratograph 5M (Site 01), Myah (Site 02).
PrimaryAgreement between the OCUTOP and the reference instrument for average non-invasive tear break-up time (NIBUT-average)Single study visit (Day 1)
Mean paired difference (OCUTOP minus reference, seconds) with 95% confidence interval, and Bland-Altman 95% limits of agreement with their 95% confidence intervals, in the analysis eye, pooled across sites and by site. Reference: Keratograph 5M (Site 01), Myah (Site 02).
PrimaryAgreement between the OCUTOP and the reference instrument for central lower tear meniscus height (TMH)Single study visit (Day 1)
Mean paired difference (OCUTOP minus reference, millimetres) with 95% confidence interval, and Bland-Altman 95% limits of agreement with their 95% confidence intervals, in the analysis eye, pooled across sites and by site. Reference: Keratograph 5M (Site 01), Myah (Site 02).
SecondaryRepeatability of the OCUTOP and of each reference instrumentSingle study visit (Day 1)
Within-subject standard deviation, repeatability coefficient, coefficient of variation and intraclass correlation coefficient from repeat captures, for K-mean, NIBUT-first, NIBUT-average, TMH, K1, K2 and the astigmatism vectors J0 and J45.
SecondaryAgreement for K1, K2 and the astigmatism vectors J0 and J45Single study visit (Day 1)Mean paired difference and 95% limits of agreement with 95% confidence intervals for K1, K2, J0 and J45, OCUTOP against each reference instrument and, at Site 01, against the Medmont E300.
SecondaryClassification agreement at TFOS cut-offsSingle study visit (Day 1)
Agreement between the OCUTOP and the reference instrument in classifying eyes at the TFOS cut-offs (NIBUT below 10 s; TMH below 0.2 mm): Cohen's kappa, sensitivity and specificity with the reference as standard.
SecondaryInter-operator reproducibility of the OCUTOPSingle study visit (Day 1)Between-operator differences and limits of agreement for the primary measures in the first 20 participants per site, each measured with the OCUTOP by two operators.
SecondaryAcquisition yieldSingle study visit (Day 1)Proportion of OCUTOP captures and videos rated unusable, overall and by site, reporting group and operator.
SecondaryParticipant acceptability and clinician usabilitySingle study visit (Day 1)
Participant acceptability of the OCUTOP measured with a short study questionnaire (comfort, duration, willingness to be measured again); clinician usability of the device and the OCUGRAPH interface measured with the System Usability Scale (0 to 100, higher is better).
SecondaryAgreement and repeatability within record-defined groupsSingle study visit (Day 1)
Descriptive agreement and repeatability statistics for the primary measures within the reporting groups formed from the clinical record (normal cornea, keratoconus, previous corneal or refractive surgery, corneal scar, high myopia, dry eye).
SecondaryDry-eye symptom scores and their relation to tear-film measuresSingle study visit (Day 1)DEQ-5 and SPEED questionnaire scores, their correlation with NIBUT and TMH from each instrument, and dry-eye classification by the TFOS DEWS III definition.
SecondarySafety: adverse events, adverse device effects, device deficiencies and participant-reported discomfortSingle study visit (Day 1)Number and nature of adverse events, adverse device effects and device deficiencies recorded during and after the visit, and participant-reported discomfort on the acceptability questionnaire.

Source ClinicalTrials.govtrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this list from software.

Twenty rows a page, as JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT07895849/registered