Trial · NCT07896161
Evaluation of a DRG-Based Clinical Management Model in a High-Complexity Chilean Hospital
NCT07896161, Not applicable, Not yet recruiting, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile
3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0
Cite this record
ConductScience Library. Evaluation of a DRG-Based Clinical Management Model in a High-Complexity Chilean Hospital. Trials, record NCT07896161. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT07896161
On this page
Trial
As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.
- Title
- Evaluation of a DRG-Based Clinical Management Model in a High-Complexity Chilean Hospital
- NCT number
- NCT07896161
- Status
- Not yet recruiting
- Phases
- Not applicable
- Enrollment
- 1,167 participants, estimated
- Lead sponsor
- Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile
- Conditions
- Hospitalisation
- Interventions
- Support medical decision making, Standard Care (in control arm)
- First posted
- 2026-10-26
- Last updated
- 2026-10-26
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Registered outcomes6
Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.
| List | Outcome | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Clinical Efficiency - Average Length of Stay | 12 months from the start of the DRG model | Measurement of the adjusted average length of hospital stay as a standardized efficiency indicator. |
| Secondary | Quality of Care (Clinical Audit) | 12 months from the start of the DRG model | Evaluation based on structured guidelines designed to evaluate compliance with quality standards for the most frequent DRGs, with standardized scores from 0 to 100 |
| Secondary | Adverse Events and Infections | 12 months from the start of the DRG model | Rate of healthcare-associated infections and recorded adverse events |
| Secondary | Readmissions and Mortality | 12 months from the start of the DRG model. | Rate of related readmissions and in-hospital mortality. |
| Secondary | Usability | 12 months from the start of the DRG model | Participating clinical care teams will be invited to complete the System Usability Scale (SUS) survey to evaluate the usability of computer systems (software, applications, web platforms). Specifically, the SUS scale consists of 10 statements rated on a 1-to-5 Likert scale. Scores are expressed on a scale of 0 to 100, with 68 considered the minimum threshold for positive usability. |
| Secondary | Experience and acceptance | 12 months from the start of the DRG model | Semi-structured interviews will be conducted to explore the experiences, perceptions, and acceptance of clinical and administrative teams regarding the implementation of the DRG-based clinical management model. The goal of these interviews is to: Understand how clinical and administrative staff perceive the usefulness and applicability of the model in their daily practice. Identify facilitators and barriers to its effective implementation (e.g., availability of time, patient load, institutional support, ease of use of the system). Evaluate the integration of the model into clinical and administrative decision-making-that is, whether DRG information is perceived as a potential contributor to improving efficiency or quality. |
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Outcomes0
Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.
None in this release.
Results by group0
Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.
None in this release.
Participant flow0
How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.
None in this release.
Adverse events0
Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.
None in this release.
Adverse event totals0
The totals the trial posted for each group.
None in this release.
Papers0
The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.
None in this release.
Grants0
The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.
None in this release.
Trial comparisons0
Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.
None in this release.
Tests0
The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.
None in this release.
Data dates
The day each source was copied for this release.
Sources 3
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
- ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
- NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
- ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
- NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)
ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.
For software
Read this trial from software.
The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.
GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT07896161
GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT07896161/registered