Trial · NCT07896525
Generative AI Simulated Patients Versus Expert Demonstration Videos for Psychiatric Interview Training in Occupational Therapy Students
NCT07896525, Not applicable, Completed, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0
Cite this record
ConductScience Library. Generative AI Simulated Patients Versus Expert Demonstration Videos for Psychiatric Interview Training in Occupational Therapy Students. Trials, record NCT07896525. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT07896525
On this page
Trial
As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.
- Title
- Generative AI Simulated Patients Versus Expert Demonstration Videos for Psychiatric Interview Training in Occupational Therapy Students
- NCT number
- NCT07896525
- Status
- Completed
- Phases
- Not applicable
- Enrollment
- 53 participants, actual
- Lead sponsor
- Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
- Conditions
- Clinical Competence, Communication Skills, Self Efficacy
- Interventions
- Generative AI simulated patient, Expert demonstration video
- First posted
- 2026-10-27
- Last updated
- 2026-11-02
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Registered outcomes4
Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.
| List | Outcome | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | OSCE interview performance score | Immediately after the Period 1 teaching session (same day, course Week 6), before crossover | Psychiatric work-history interview performance with a standardized patient, rated by examiners blinded to the teaching group using a 15-item rubric on a 4-point scale (1 = needs improvement to 4 = excellent) across three domains: establishing a therapeutic relationship, gathering a complete work history, and discussing work expectations. Total score range 15-60; higher scores indicate better performance. |
| Secondary | Interview self-efficacy | T1: before teaching (Week 5); T2: after Period 1, before crossover (Week 6); T3: after Period 2 (Week 7) | Psychiatric Interview Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (study-specific, 10 items), assessing confidence in conducting psychiatric work-history interviews, rated on a 5-point scale. Total score range 10 to 50; higher scores indicate greater interview self-efficacy. |
| Secondary | Student evaluation of the two teaching methods and preferred learning sequence | After students had experienced both methods (Week 7) | Teaching Method Evaluation Questionnaire (study-specific, anonymous), administered after students had experienced both teaching methods. Eight parallel statements on the learning experience (e.g., clarity of instruction, a safe environment in which to make mistakes, usefulness of feedback) were rated separately for each teaching method on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree to 5 = strongly agree). Total score range 8 to 40 for each method; higher scores indicate a more favorable evaluation. Four forced-choice items comparing the two methods and asking the preferred learning sequence are reported descriptively as the number of students choosing each option. |
| Other | End-of-course retrospective reflection on interview confidence | End of course (approximately 10 weeks after the teaching sessions) | End-of-Course Retrospective Confidence Reflection Questionnaire (study-specific, exploratory), administered as an end-of-course reflection activity. Students retrospectively rated their psychiatric interview confidence at seven course stages (from before any practice, through each teaching method, to before and after their first real-client interview and the end of the course) on a visual analogue-type numeric rating scale from 1 (lowest confidence) to 10 (highest confidence). Score range 1 to 10 at each stage; higher scores indicate greater confidence. Items on the learning resource recalled during real-client interviews and the preferred learning sequence are reported descriptively as the number of students choosing each option. |
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Outcomes0
Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.
None in this release.
Results by group0
Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.
None in this release.
Participant flow0
How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.
None in this release.
Adverse events0
Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.
None in this release.
Adverse event totals0
The totals the trial posted for each group.
None in this release.
Papers0
The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.
None in this release.
Grants0
The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.
None in this release.
Trial comparisons0
Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.
None in this release.
Tests0
The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.
None in this release.
Data dates
The day each source was copied for this release.
Sources 3
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
- ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
- NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
- ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
- NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)
ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.
For software
Read this trial from software.
The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.
GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT07896525
GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT07896525/registered