Trial · NCT07897214
Comparison Between Objective Biomechanical Cost and Perceived Physical Demand in Manual Wheelchair Users During Propulsion Tasks
NCT07897214, Not applicable, Recruiting, Centre Médico-Chirurgical de Réadaptation des Massues Croix Rouge Française
3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0
Cite this record
ConductScience Library. Comparison Between Objective Biomechanical Cost and Perceived Physical Demand in Manual Wheelchair Users During Propulsion Tasks. Trials, record NCT07897214. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT07897214
On this page
Trial
As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.
- Title
- Comparison Between Objective Biomechanical Cost and Perceived Physical Demand in Manual Wheelchair Users During Propulsion Tasks
- NCT number
- NCT07897214
- Status
- Recruiting
- Phases
- Not applicable
- Enrollment
- 15 participants, estimated
- Lead sponsor
- Centre Médico-Chirurgical de Réadaptation des Massues Croix Rouge Française
- Conditions
- Manual Wheelchair Use, Spinal Cord Injury
- Interventions
- Instrumented Manual Wheelchair Propulsion Tasks (Motion Analysis and Instrumented Handrims), Concurrent Cognitive Task (Auditory-Verbal 2-back)
- First posted
- 2026-10-27
- Last updated
- 2026-10-27
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Registered outcomes7
Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.
| List | Outcome | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Correlation Between Perceived Physical Demand (NASA-TLX) and Objective Biomechanical Shoulder Load | During the experimental session (Day 1) | Spearman correlation between the physical demand subscore of the NASA-TLX questionnaire and the biomechanical cost estimated at the shoulder (kinematic and kinetic parameters derived from motion capture and instrumented handrim force data, using an upper-limb biomechanical model), during simple and more physically demanding propulsion tasks (ramp, floor surface change). |
| Secondary | Change in the Correlation Between NASA-TLX Physical Demand Score and Glenohumeral Joint Reaction Force Under Added Mental, Temporal and Performance Demand | During the experimental session (Day 1) | Correlation between two measures, compared between baseline tasks and tasks with added mental, cognitive, temporal, performance and/or frustration demand: Perceived physical demand: score on the Physical Demand subscale of the NASA Task Load Index (NASA-TLX) questionnaire, rated on a 0-20 scale (0 = very low, 20 = very high), completed after each task. Biomechanical load at the shoulder: peak glenohumeral joint reaction force (N), estimated with \[a musculoskeletal model, e.g., OpenSim\] from optoelectronic motion capture data and external forces measured with a six-axis force/torque sensor. Unit of measure: \[Spearman\] correlation coefficient (unitless, range -1 to 1), calculated separately for each task condition. The effect of added demand is assessed as the difference in correlation coefficients between conditions. |
| Secondary | Effect of Dual Task on Shoulder Range of Motion During Wheelchair Propulsion | During the experimental session (Day 1) | Difference in sagittal-plane shoulder flexion/extension range of motion (degrees) between single-task propulsion and dual-task propulsion (propulsion with a concurrent 2-back cognitive task), measured with an optoelectronic motion capture system (Qualysis). |
| Secondary | Effect of Dual Task on Peak Total Force Applied on the Handrim | During the experimental session (Day 1) | Difference in peak total force applied on the handrim (N) between single-task and dual-task propulsion, measured with an instrumented wheelchair wheel. |
| Secondary | Effect of Dual Task on Peak Shoulder Joint Reaction Force | During the experimental session (Day 1) | Difference in peak glenohumeral joint reaction force (N) between single-task and dual-task propulsion, estimated with \[a musculoskeletal model from motion capture and handrim kinetic data. |
| Secondary | Effect of Dual Task on 2-Back Task Accuracy | During the experimental session (Day 1) | Difference in the percentage of correct responses (%) on the 2-back cognitive task between single-task condition (seated, no propulsion) and dual-task propulsion. |
| Secondary | Effect of Dual Task on 2-Back Task Reaction Time | During the experimental session (Day 1) | Difference in mean reaction time (ms) for correct responses on the 2-back cognitive task between single-task condition and dual-task propulsion. |
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Outcomes0
Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.
None in this release.
Results by group0
Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.
None in this release.
Participant flow0
How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.
None in this release.
Adverse events0
Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.
None in this release.
Adverse event totals0
The totals the trial posted for each group.
None in this release.
Papers0
The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.
None in this release.
Grants0
The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.
None in this release.
Trial comparisons0
Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.
None in this release.
Tests1
The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.
| Test | Named as |
|---|---|
| 2-Back Task | Secondary outcome |
Source ConductCognition
Data dates
The day each source was copied for this release.
Sources 3
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
- ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
- NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
- ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
- NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)
ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.
For software
Read this trial from software.
The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.
GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT07897214
GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT07897214/registered