ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT07897214

Comparison Between Objective Biomechanical Cost and Perceived Physical Demand in Manual Wheelchair Users During Propulsion Tasks

NCT07897214, Not applicable, Recruiting, Centre Médico-Chirurgical de Réadaptation des Massues Croix Rouge Française

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Comparison Between Objective Biomechanical Cost and Perceived Physical Demand in Manual Wheelchair Users During Propulsion Tasks. Trials, record NCT07897214. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT07897214

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Comparison Between Objective Biomechanical Cost and Perceived Physical Demand in Manual Wheelchair Users During Propulsion Tasks
NCT number
NCT07897214
Status
Recruiting
Phases
Not applicable
Enrollment
15 participants, estimated
Lead sponsor
Centre Médico-Chirurgical de Réadaptation des Massues Croix Rouge Française
Conditions
Manual Wheelchair Use, Spinal Cord Injury
Interventions
Instrumented Manual Wheelchair Propulsion Tasks (Motion Analysis and Instrumented Handrims), Concurrent Cognitive Task (Auditory-Verbal 2-back)
First posted
2026-10-27
Last updated
2026-10-27

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes7

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryCorrelation Between Perceived Physical Demand (NASA-TLX) and Objective Biomechanical Shoulder LoadDuring the experimental session (Day 1)
Spearman correlation between the physical demand subscore of the NASA-TLX questionnaire and the biomechanical cost estimated at the shoulder (kinematic and kinetic parameters derived from motion capture and instrumented handrim force data, using an upper-limb biomechanical model), during simple and more physically demanding propulsion tasks (ramp, floor surface change).
SecondaryChange in the Correlation Between NASA-TLX Physical Demand Score and Glenohumeral Joint Reaction Force Under Added Mental, Temporal and Performance DemandDuring the experimental session (Day 1)
Correlation between two measures, compared between baseline tasks and tasks with added mental, cognitive, temporal, performance and/or frustration demand: Perceived physical demand: score on the Physical Demand subscale of the NASA Task Load Index (NASA-TLX) questionnaire, rated on a 0-20 scale (0 = very low, 20 = very high), completed after each task. Biomechanical load at the shoulder: peak glenohumeral joint reaction force (N), estimated with \[a musculoskeletal model, e.g., OpenSim\] from optoelectronic motion capture data and external forces measured with a six-axis force/torque sensor. Unit of measure: \[Spearman\] correlation coefficient (unitless, range -1 to 1), calculated separately for each task condition. The effect of added demand is assessed as the difference in correlation coefficients between conditions.
SecondaryEffect of Dual Task on Shoulder Range of Motion During Wheelchair PropulsionDuring the experimental session (Day 1)
Difference in sagittal-plane shoulder flexion/extension range of motion (degrees) between single-task propulsion and dual-task propulsion (propulsion with a concurrent 2-back cognitive task), measured with an optoelectronic motion capture system (Qualysis).
SecondaryEffect of Dual Task on Peak Total Force Applied on the HandrimDuring the experimental session (Day 1)Difference in peak total force applied on the handrim (N) between single-task and dual-task propulsion, measured with an instrumented wheelchair wheel.
SecondaryEffect of Dual Task on Peak Shoulder Joint Reaction ForceDuring the experimental session (Day 1)Difference in peak glenohumeral joint reaction force (N) between single-task and dual-task propulsion, estimated with \[a musculoskeletal model from motion capture and handrim kinetic data.
SecondaryEffect of Dual Task on 2-Back Task AccuracyDuring the experimental session (Day 1)Difference in the percentage of correct responses (%) on the 2-back cognitive task between single-task condition (seated, no propulsion) and dual-task propulsion.
SecondaryEffect of Dual Task on 2-Back Task Reaction TimeDuring the experimental session (Day 1)Difference in mean reaction time (ms) for correct responses on the 2-back cognitive task between single-task condition and dual-task propulsion.

Outcomes0

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

None in this release.

Results by group0

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

None in this release.

Participant flow0

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

None in this release.

Adverse events0

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

None in this release.

Adverse event totals0

The totals the trial posted for each group.

None in this release.

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests1

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

TestNamed as
2-Back TaskSecondary outcome

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT07897214

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT07897214/registered