ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT07897422

AI-Driven Video Avatars vs. Customized GPTs: Professional English Learning Among Nursing Students

NCT07897422, Not applicable, Not yet recruiting, Manisa Celal Bayar University

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. AI-Driven Video Avatars vs. Customized GPTs: Professional English Learning Among Nursing Students. Trials, record NCT07897422. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT07897422

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
AI-Driven Video Avatars vs. Customized GPTs: Professional English Learning Among Nursing Students
NCT number
NCT07897422
Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Not applicable
Enrollment
70 participants, estimated
Lead sponsor
Manisa Celal Bayar University
Conditions
Artifical Intelligence, Generative Artificial Intelligence, Education, Nursing Students
Interventions
Interactive AI Video Avatar, Personalized GPT Interface
First posted
2026-10-27
Last updated
2026-10-27

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes3

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryChange in Professional English Knowledge Test ScoreFrom enrollment to the end of application at 15 weeks
It is assessed by the Professional English Knowledge Test. It evaluates the professional English language proficiency of nursing students, covers clinical nursing terminology, nurse-patient therapeutic communication, patient education, and taking patient history. The test comprises 20 multiple-choice questions tailored to the course objectives. Higher total scores indicate greater professional English knowledge and language competency.
PrimaryChange in Attitudes Toward Generative Artificial Intelligence in English LearningFrom enrollment to the end of application at 15 weeks
It is assessed by the Generative Artificial Intelligence Attitude Scale for EFL Learners (GenAIAS). It assesses students' attitudes toward generative artificial intelligence in English learning. The scale comprises 33 items rated on a 5-point Likert scale (1=Strongly Disagree to 5=Strongly Agree), covering four sub-dimensions: Learning, Enjoyment, Usefulness, and Interest. The total score ranges from a minimum of 33 to a maximum of 165 points. Higher scores indicate more positive attitudes toward generative AI in English language learning.
SecondaryOverall Educational AI Tool SatisfactionAt the end of application at 15 weeks
It is assessed by the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). It evaluates overall participant satisfaction with their assigned educational AI tool. Participants mark their response on a continuous line anchored from "very bad" (0 mm) to "very good" (100 mm). Higher scores indicate higher satisfaction with the assigned educational AI tool.

Outcomes0

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

None in this release.

Results by group0

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

None in this release.

Participant flow0

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

None in this release.

Adverse events0

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

None in this release.

Adverse event totals0

The totals the trial posted for each group.

None in this release.

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT07897422

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT07897422/registered