ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT07897903

Registered outcomes13

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryTreatment retention/adherenceAt the beginning of each session (all 12 weeks)Proportion of enrolled participants who complete the intervention (participants retention/adherance \>= 75%).
PrimaryRecruitment rateRecruitment periodParticipants enrolled
PrimaryMean number of sessions attended and attrition rateAt the beginning of each session (all 12 weeks)
PrimaryClient Satisfaction QuestionnaireImmediately after the intervention (week 12)
Acceptability will be assessed after the intervention using a participant satisfaction questionnaire (CSQ-8). The questionnaire will evaluate participants' perceived usefulness, relevance, comprehensibility, and overall satisfaction with the intervention. 8 items rated from 1 to 4. Total score ranges from 8 to 32. Higher scores indicate greater satisfaction and acceptability (better outcome).
SecondaryChange in PTSD/CPTSD symptoms (I) at 12 weeks and 6 monthsBaseline, at the beginning of each session, end of treatment (week 12), and 6-month follow-up
PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5; Weathers et al., 2013). * 20 items rated from 0 (not at all) to 4 (extremely). Total score ranges from 0 to 80. * Higher scores indicate a worse outcome (more severe symptoms).
SecondaryChange in PTSD/CPTSD symptoms (II) at 12 weeks and 6 monthsBaseline, end of treatment (week 12), and 6-month follow-up
International Trauma Questionnaire (ITQ; Cloitre et al., 2018). * 12 symptom items (6 PTSD, 6 Disturbances in Self-Organization) rated from 0 (not at all) to 4 (extremely). Symptom total score ranges from 0 to 48 (each of the two sets of items from 0 to 24). * Higher scores indicate a worse outcome (more severe symptoms).
SecondaryChange in PTSD/CPTSD symptoms (III) at 12 weeks and 6 monthsBaseline, end of treatment (week 12), and 6-month follow-up
Impact of Trauma Questionnaire (Spanish questionnaire; "Cuestionario de Impacto del Trauma", CIT; Crespo, González-Ordi, Gómez-Gutiérrez, Santamaría, 2020). * 180 items related to different scales on PTSD symptomatology and comorbid symptomatology rated from 1 (never) to 5 (always). * Higher scores mean worse outcome (more severe symptoms).
SecondaryChange from psychopathological symptoms at 12 weeks and 6 monthsBaseline, end of treatment (week 12), and 6-month follow-up
Symptom Assessment-45 Questionnaire (SA-45; Davison et al., 1997), a brief version of the Symptom Checklist-90-Revised (SCL-90-R). * 45 items rated from 0 (not at all) to 4 (a lot). It covers a total of 9 different symptomatic areas (e.g. depression, anxiety, interpersonal sensibility) and gives an overall severity score. Total score ranges from \[0 to 180\]. * Higher scores indicate a worse outcome (more severe symptoms).
SecondaryChange from Well-being at 12 weeks and 6 monthsBaseline, end of treatment (week 12), and 6-month follow-up
Ryff's Scales of Psychological Well-Being (Ryff \& Keyes, 1995). * 29 items rated from 1 (strongly disagree) to 6 (strongly agree). The SPWB evaluates 6 dimensions of psychological well-being: Self-acceptance, Positive relationships, Autonomy, Environmental mastery, Life purpose, and Personal growth. Scores ranges differ from scale to scale: * Self-acceptance \[4-24\] * Positive relationships \[5-30\] * Autonomy \[6-36\] * Environmental mastery \[5-30\] * Life purpose \[4-24\] * Personal growth \[5-30\] * Higher scores indicate a better outcome (more psychological wellbeing).
SecondaryChange from Satisfaction with life at 12 weeks and 6 monthsBaseline, end of treatment (week 12), and 6-month follow-up
Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS; Diener et al., 1985). * 5 items rated from 1 (strongly disagree) to 7 (strongly agree). Total score ranges from 5 to 35. * Higher scores indicate a better outcome (more satisfaction with life).
SecondaryChange from Emotion Regulation at 12 weeks and 6 monthsBaseline, end of treatment (week 12), and 6-month follow-up
Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire-short (CERQ-short; Garnefski \& Kraaij, 2007). * 18 items rated from 1 (almost never) to 5 (almost always). The CERQ-short evaluates 9 dimensions (composed by 2 items each): Self-blame, Acceptance, Rumination, Positive refocusing, Refocus on planning, Positive reappraisal, Putting into perspectiva, Catastrophizing, and Other-blame. Each dimension ranges from 5 to 10. Also, two big dimensions are calculated depending on the type of strategy: * Sum of the adaptive subscales (acceptance, positive refocusing, refocus on planning, positive reappraisal, putting into perspective; 10 items) ranges from 10 to 50. Higher scores indicate a better outcome. * Sum of the maladaptive subscales (self-blame, rumination, catastrophizing, other-blame; 8 items) ranges from 8 to 40. Higher scores indicate a worse outcome.
SecondaryChange from Self-care at 12 weeks and 6 monthsBaseline, end of treatment (week 12), and 6-month follow-up
Self-Care Scale (Spanish instrument; "Escala de autocuidado", Gonzalez et al., 2017), * 31 items rated from 1 (completely disagre) to 7 (completely agree). The scale evaluates dimensions: Self-destructive behaviors, Non-tolerance towards positive affect, Issues accepting help, Resentment due to non-reciprocity, No positive activities, and None attendace towards personal needs. * Higher scores indicate worse self-care.
SecondaryChange from depression at 12 weeks and 6 monthsBaseline, at the beginning of each session, end of treatment (week 12), and 6-month follow-up
Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9; Kroenke et al., 2001). * 9 items rated from 0 (not at all) to 3 (nearly every day). Total score ranges from 0 to 27. * Higher scores indicate a worse outcome (more severe symptoms).

Source ClinicalTrials.govtrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this list from software.

Twenty rows a page, as JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT07897903/registered