ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT07898670

Effects of Ashwagandha Supplementation on Quality of Life and Well-Being in Women With Endometriosis

NCT07898670, Not applicable, Not yet recruiting, Medical University of Vienna

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Effects of Ashwagandha Supplementation on Quality of Life and Well-Being in Women With Endometriosis. Trials, record NCT07898670. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT07898670

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Effects of Ashwagandha Supplementation on Quality of Life and Well-Being in Women With Endometriosis
NCT number
NCT07898670
Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Not applicable
Enrollment
90 participants, estimated
Lead sponsor
Medical University of Vienna
Conditions
Endometriosis, Quality of Life, Pain, Perceived Stress, Psychological Well Being
Interventions
Ashwagandha, placebo capsule
First posted
2026-10-27
Last updated
2026-10-27

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes13

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryChange from baseline in the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) Mental Component Summary (MCS) scoreBaseline and end of the initial randomized phase at 12 weeks (up to 16 weeks if extended to align with the menstrual cycle).
Between-group difference in change from baseline to the end of the initial randomized phase in the SF-36 Mental Component Summary (MCS) score, comparing ashwagandha with placebo. The MCS assesses mental health-related quality of life and is calculated using a standardized, norm-based scoring algorithm, with a reference population mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. Higher scores indicate better mental health-related quality of life.
SecondaryChange in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) Physical Component Summary (PCS) scoreBaseline to the end of the initial randomized phase at Week 12 (up to Week 16 if extended to align assessments with the menstrual cycle).
Between-group difference in change from baseline to the end of the initial randomized phase in the SF-36 Physical Component Summary (PCS) score, comparing ashwagandha with placebo. The PCS assesses physical health-related quality of life and is calculated using a standardized, norm-based scoring algorithm, with a reference population mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. Higher scores indicate better physical health-related quality of life.
SecondaryChange in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) domain scoresBaseline to the end of the initial randomized phase at Week 12 (up to Week 16 if extended to align assessments with the menstrual cycle).
Between-group differences in change from baseline to the end of the initial randomized phase in the eight domains of the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), comparing ashwagandha with placebo: physical functioning, role limitations due to physical health, role limitations due to emotional problems, energy/fatigue, emotional well-being, social functioning, pain, and general health. Each domain is scored separately on a scale from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better health-related quality of life.
SecondaryChange in Endometriosis Health Profile-30 global scoreBaseline to the end of the initial randomized phase at Week 12 (up to Week 16 if extended to align assessments with the menstrual cycle).
Between-group difference in change from baseline to the end of the initial randomized phase in endometriosis-related quality of life, assessed using the Endometriosis Health Profile-30 (EHP-30) global score, comparing ashwagandha with placebo. Scores range from 0 to 100, with lower scores indicating better endometriosis-related quality of life.
SecondaryChange in perceived stressBaseline to the end of the initial randomized phase at Week 12 (up to Week 16 if extended to align assessments with the menstrual cycle).
Between-group difference in change from baseline to the end of the initial randomized phase in perceived stress, assessed using the 10-item Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10), comparing ashwagandha with placebo. The total score ranges from 0 to 40, with higher scores indicating greater perceived stress.
SecondaryParticipant-reported pain-management strategies and pain medication useBaseline to the end of the initial randomized phase at Week 12 (up to Week 16 if extended to align assessments with the menstrual cycle).Comparison between the ashwagandha and placebo groups of participant-reported pain-management strategies, including total pain medication (name, number, dosage) use during the menstrual cycle.
SecondaryChange in participant-reported dyspareuniaBaseline to the end of the initial randomized phase at Week 12 (up to Week 16 if extended to align assessments with the menstrual cycle).
Between-group difference in change from baseline to the end of the initial randomized phase in participant-reported pain during sexual intercourse (dyspareunia), comparing ashwagandha with placebo. Pain intensity is assessed using an 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain), with higher scores indicating greater pain intensity.
SecondaryWithin-person change in the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) Mental Component Summary (MCS) during the open-label extensionStart of the open-label extension to its completion 12 weeks later (approximately study Week 12-24, or Week 16-28 if the initial phase is extended).
Within-person change in the SF-36 Mental Component Summary (MCS) score from the start to the end of the open-label extension, during which participants receive ashwagandha. The MCS assesses mental health-related quality of life and is calculated using a standardized, norm-based scoring algorithm, with a reference population mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. Higher scores indicate better mental health-related quality of life.
SecondaryWithin-person change in the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) Physical Component Summary (PCS ) during the open-label extensionStart of the open-label extension to its completion 12 weeks later (approximately study Week 12-24, or Week 16-28 if the initial phase is extended).
Within-person change in the SF-36 Physical Component Summary (PCS) score from the start to the end of the open-label extension, during which participants receive ashwagandha. The PCS assesses physical health-related quality of life and is calculated using a standardized, norm-based scoring algorithm, with a reference population mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. Higher scores indicate better physical health-related quality of life.
SecondaryWithin-person change in the Endometriosis Health Profile-30 (EHP-30) during the open-label extensionStart of the open-label extension to its completion 12 weeks later (approximately study Week 12-24, or Week 16-28 if the initial phase is extended).
Within-person change in the Endometriosis Health Profile-30 (EHP-30) global score from the start to the end of the open-label extension, during which participants receive ashwagandha. The EHP-30 assesses endometriosis-related quality of life. Scores range from 0 to 100, with lower scores indicating better endometriosis-related quality of life.

Outcomes0

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

None in this release.

Results by group0

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

None in this release.

Participant flow0

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

None in this release.

Adverse events0

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

None in this release.

Adverse event totals0

The totals the trial posted for each group.

None in this release.

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT07898670

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT07898670/registered