ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT07901153

Registered outcomes14

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryChange in WOMAC Total Score From Baseline to 12 MonthsBaseline and 12 months after the intervention
Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), validated Brazilian Portuguese version. The WOMAC has 24 items (pain, 5 items; stiffness, 2 items; physical function, 17 items), each scored from 0 (none) to 4 (extreme) on a Likert scale. The total score ranges from 0 to 96 points, and higher scores indicate worse pain, stiffness and physical function (worse outcome). The outcome is the change from baseline to 12 months; a greater reduction indicates greater improvement. Primary comparison: PRP combined with hyaluronic acid versus PRP alone.
SecondaryWOMAC Total and Subscale Scores (Pain, Stiffness and Physical Function)Baseline, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months after the intervention
Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), validated Brazilian Portuguese version, compared among the three groups. Total score ranges from 0 to 96; subscales range from 0 to 20 (pain), 0 to 8 (stiffness) and 0 to 68 (physical function). For the total score and all subscales, higher scores indicate worse symptoms and function (worse outcome).
SecondaryKnee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)Baseline, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months after the intervention
Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), validated Brazilian Portuguese version, five subscales scored separately: pain, other symptoms, function in activities of daily living, function in sport and recreation, and knee-related quality of life. Each subscale ranges from 0 (extreme knee problems) to 100 (no knee problems); higher scores indicate better outcomes.
SecondaryLysholm Knee Scoring ScaleBaseline, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months after the interventionLysholm score (0 to 100; higher scores indicate better knee function).
SecondaryTegner Activity LevelBaseline, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months after the interventionTegner activity scale (0 to 10; higher levels indicate higher physical and sports activity).
SecondaryInternational Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee FormBaseline, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months after the interventionIKDC subjective score (0 to 100; higher scores indicate better knee function and fewer symptoms).
SecondaryKnee Pain Intensity by Visual Analog Scale (VAS)Baseline, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months after the interventionAverage knee pain in the previous week on a 0 to 10 visual analog scale (0 = no pain; 10 = worst imaginable pain).
SecondaryPatient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I)3, 6, 12 and 24 months after the interventionParticipant-rated global impression of change on a 7-point scale (1 = very much better; 7 = very much worse).
SecondarySatisfaction With Treatment3, 6, 12 and 24 months after the interventionParticipant satisfaction with the treatment received on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = very dissatisfied; 5 = very satisfied).
SecondaryProportion of OMERACT-OARSI Responders3, 6, 12 and 24 months after the intervention
Responders defined as improvement of at least 50% and 20 points (0 to 100 scale) in pain or function, or improvement of at least 20% and 10 points in at least two of pain, function and patient global assessment.
SecondaryUse of Rescue MedicationUp to 24 months after the intervention
Use of rescue medication in each follow-up period (yes or no), drug, dose and frequency, expressed as number of days of use and cumulative dose of acetaminophen and other analgesics or anti-inflammatory drugs.
SecondaryCointerventions, New Injections and Knee SurgeryUp to 24 months after the interventionNumber of participants with cointerventions, new intra-articular injections, surgical referral, surgery on the target knee or knee arthroplasty.
SecondaryIncidence of Adverse EventsUp to 24 months after the intervention
Number and type of adverse events, related or not to the intervention (for example, post-injection pain, effusion, stiffness, bruising, vasovagal reaction and septic arthritis), graded by severity and relationship to the procedure.
OtherAssociation Between PRP Characteristics and Clinical ResponseBaseline and 12 months after the intervention
Association between change in WOMAC total score and PRP characteristics: platelet concentration, total platelet dose, injected volume, leukocytes, red blood cells, concentration factor and platelet recovery.

Source ClinicalTrials.govtrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this list from software.

Twenty rows a page, as JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT07901153/registered