ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT07901504

Remimazolam vs Propofol for Motor and Somatosensory Evoked Potentials in Spinal Tumor Surgery

NCT07901504, Phase 4, Not yet recruiting, Beijing Tsinghua Chang Gung Hospital

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Remimazolam vs Propofol for Motor and Somatosensory Evoked Potentials in Spinal Tumor Surgery. Trials, record NCT07901504. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT07901504

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Remimazolam vs Propofol for Motor and Somatosensory Evoked Potentials in Spinal Tumor Surgery
NCT number
NCT07901504
Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Enrollment
190 participants, estimated
Lead sponsor
Beijing Tsinghua Chang Gung Hospital
Conditions
Spinal Cord Neoplasms, Spinal Neoplasms
Interventions
Remimazolam, Propofol
First posted
2026-10-28
Last updated
2026-10-28

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes9

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryMEP amplitude preservation ratio during the critical period of tumor manipulationIntraoperative: from the baseline recording (after induction of anesthesia and before surgical incision) through the end of tumor manipulation
Mean motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitude of the target muscles recorded during the critical period of tumor manipulation (time points T2 to T4), expressed as a percentage of the baseline (T0) amplitude. Baseline MEP amplitude is recorded after induction of anesthesia and before surgical incision, with a train-of-four ratio of at least 0.9. The primary analysis uses analysis of covariance with adjustment for baseline MEP amplitude, tumor type, tumor level, age and body mass index, under the intention-to-treat principle, with a per-protocol sensitivity analysis. The superiority margin is zero.
SecondaryIncidence of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring alert eventsIntraoperative: from the baseline recording after induction of anesthesia to the end of surgery
Proportion of participants with at least one intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring alert event, defined as a decrease in MEP amplitude of 50 percent or more from baseline, or prolongation of somatosensory evoked potential latency of 10 percent or more from baseline.
SecondaryChange in somatosensory evoked potential N20 or P37 latency and amplitudeIntraoperative: from the baseline recording after induction of anesthesia to the end of surgery
Change from baseline in the latency and amplitude of the cortical somatosensory evoked potential component (N20 for upper-limb stimulation or P37 for lower-limb stimulation), expressed as a percentage of the baseline value.
SecondaryRate of change and variability of motor evoked potential amplitudeIntraoperative: from the baseline recording after induction of anesthesia to the end of surgeryAbsolute and percentage change in MEP amplitude from baseline at each intraoperative time point, and the coefficient of variation of MEP amplitude across the monitoring period.
SecondaryIntraoperative hemodynamic variables and vasoactive drug requirementIntraoperative: from induction of anesthesia to the end of surgeryMean arterial pressure, heart rate, and cumulative dose of vasoactive agents required to maintain mean arterial pressure within 10 percent of baseline and not below 80 mmHg.
SecondaryTime to extubation and post-anesthesia care unit length of stayFrom the end of surgery to discharge from the post-anesthesia care unit, up to 24 hoursTime from discontinuation of the anesthetic infusion to tracheal extubation, and duration of stay in the post-anesthesia care unit.
SecondaryQuality of recovery assessed by the Quality of Recovery-15 questionnairePostoperative day 1 and postoperative day 2Total score of the Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) questionnaire, ranging from 0 to 150, with higher scores indicating better quality of recovery.
SecondaryNeurological function assessed by the Japanese Orthopaedic Association scoreBefore surgery, postoperative day 1, and postoperative day 30
Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score assessed before surgery and after surgery; lower scores indicate greater neurological impairment. The change from baseline and its correlation with intraoperative MEP variability are evaluated.
SecondaryIncidence of adverse events and serious adverse eventsFrom induction of anesthesia through postoperative day 30Number and proportion of participants experiencing treatment-emergent adverse events and serious adverse events, coded by preferred term and system organ class.

Outcomes0

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

None in this release.

Results by group0

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

None in this release.

Participant flow0

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

None in this release.

Adverse events0

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

None in this release.

Adverse event totals0

The totals the trial posted for each group.

None in this release.

Papers3

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
39895300BACKGROUNDPubMed
40807112BACKGROUNDPubMed
42170486BACKGROUNDPubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT07901504

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT07901504/registered