ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT07903597

Perception of the Benefits and Effectiveness of Inhalation Therapy in Patients With Obstructive Dyspnea

NCT07903597, Completed, Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri SpA

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Perception of the Benefits and Effectiveness of Inhalation Therapy in Patients With Obstructive Dyspnea. Trials, record NCT07903597. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT07903597

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Perception of the Benefits and Effectiveness of Inhalation Therapy in Patients With Obstructive Dyspnea
NCT number
NCT07903597
Status
Completed
Enrollment
101 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri SpA
Conditions
COPD, Asthma
Interventions
Survey
First posted
2026-10-29
Last updated
2026-11-02

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes3

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryAUDITBaseline
The structured interview must cover several areas of investigation, namely: 1. specifically, patients' perceptions and opinions regarding inhalation therapy (e.g., administration methods, frequency, and ease of use; perceived effectiveness; reasons for prescription; and perceived severity of the disease associated with this therapy); 2. the patient's awareness of and knowledge about the disease, 3. perceptions of therapy in general and patient preferences; and 4. motivation to adhere to prescriptions.
SecondaryQUESTIONNAIREStarting from month 1
The final version of the questionnaire is organized into four sections. The first part of the questionnaire is designed to collect the patient's medical history: it includes questions about education level, employment, presence of a caregiver, type of diagnosis and its duration, the type of inhalation therapy used, number of administrations, presence of comorbidities, other medications taken, and whether the patient is autonomous in managing his/her pharmacological therapy. The second part of the questionnaire explores the patients' perception of their condition. The third part focuses on therapies in general, while the fourth and final section concentrates exclusively on inhalation therapy. The questionnaire does not yield an overall score, and therefore no minimum or maximum total score can be determined. Accordingly, each item will be considered and analyzed individually.
SecondaryBELIEFSStarting from month 1
In addition to the structured interview, participants completed questionnaires evaluating treatment perceptions and beliefs about medication. The Beliefs about Medicines Questionnaire (BMQ), a validated instrument designed to assess cognitive representations of medication, was included in the study protocol. Patients rated their agreement with each statement on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). The BMQ comprises a Specific section, assessing beliefs about the necessity of prescribed medications and concerns related to their use, and a General section, evaluating beliefs about medicines as a class of treatment.

Outcomes0

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

None in this release.

Results by group0

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

None in this release.

Participant flow0

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

None in this release.

Adverse events0

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

None in this release.

Adverse event totals0

The totals the trial posted for each group.

None in this release.

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT07903597

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT07903597/registered