Trial · NCT07905196
Anesthetic Effectiveness of Mental/Incisive Nerve Block Versus Inferior Nerve Block Using 4% Articaine and 2% Lidocaine in Mandibular First and Second Premolars With Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis.
NCT07905196, Not applicable, Not yet recruiting, Foundation University Islamabad
3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0
Cite this record
ConductScience Library. Anesthetic Effectiveness of Mental/Incisive Nerve Block Versus Inferior Nerve Block Using 4% Articaine and 2% Lidocaine in Mandibular First and Second Premolars With Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis. Trials, record NCT07905196. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT07905196
On this page
Trial
As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.
- Title
- Anesthetic Effectiveness of Mental/Incisive Nerve Block Versus Inferior Nerve Block Using 4% Articaine and 2% Lidocaine in Mandibular First and Second Premolars With Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis.
- NCT number
- NCT07905196
- Status
- Not yet recruiting
- Phases
- Not applicable
- Enrollment
- 108 participants, estimated
- Lead sponsor
- Foundation University Islamabad
- Conditions
- Pain
- Interventions
Group A : MINB with 2% Lidocaine HCL+ 1:1000,000 Epinephrine - 1.8 ml, Group B : MINB with 4% Articaine HCL + 1:1000,000 Epinephrine - 1.8 ml, Group C : IANB with 2% Lidocaine HCL + 1:1000,000 Epinephrine - 1.8 ml, Group D : IANB with 4% Articaine HCL + 1:1000,000 Epinephrine - 1.8 ml
- First posted
- 2026-10-29
- Last updated
- 2026-10-29
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Registered outcomes5
Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.
| List | Outcome | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Anesthetic Success Rate | Periprocedural and Intraprocedural 1) Preprocedural Assessment of pain on NRS scale (0-10) 2)Intra- Procedural Outcome is Assessed at 15 minutes after giving anesthesia. If no numbness after 15 minutes the patient is excluded from the study. | Anesthetic success rate defined as completing access cavity preparation + pulp extirpation with 1. Success : NRS 0-3 ( No pain/ Mild pain) WITHOUT need for supplemental anesthesia 2. Failure : NRS\>3 ( Moderate/Severe pain) requiring supplemental anesthesia |
| Secondary | Pain scores (NRS 0-10) at 4 time points | Intraoperative | Pain scores recorded at 4 time points 1. Preoperative pain 2. Pain response to Cold test 3. Pain during access cavity preparation 4. Pain during pulp extirpation |
| Secondary | Soft tissue anesthesia success | Intraoperative | Presence of soft tissue numbness at 15 mins post-injection assessed by tactile sensation + gentle probing of buccal gingiva |
| Secondary | Need for Supplemental Anesthesia | Intraoperative | Yes/No and Type : Intra ligamental/Additional block/Buccal Infiltration /Intra pulpal |
| Secondary | Complications | Intraoperative/ Postoperative | Complications after anesthesia can occur like Persistent numbness/Hematoma /Discomfort at injection site / |
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Outcomes0
Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.
None in this release.
Results by group0
Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.
None in this release.
Participant flow0
How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.
None in this release.
Adverse events0
Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.
None in this release.
Adverse event totals0
The totals the trial posted for each group.
None in this release.
Papers6
The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.
Grants0
The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.
None in this release.
Trial comparisons0
Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.
None in this release.
Tests0
The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.
None in this release.
Data dates
The day each source was copied for this release.
Sources 3
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
- ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
- NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
- ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
- NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)
ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.
For software
Read this trial from software.
The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.
GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT07905196
GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT07905196/registered