Trial · NCT07905703
Comparative Effects of Vestibular Rehabilitation With and Without Cervical JPS Training in Stroke Patients
NCT07905703, Not applicable, Active not recruiting, University of Management and Technology Lahore
3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0
Cite this record
ConductScience Library. Comparative Effects of Vestibular Rehabilitation With and Without Cervical JPS Training in Stroke Patients. Trials, record NCT07905703. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT07905703
On this page
Trial
As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.
- Title
- Comparative Effects of Vestibular Rehabilitation With and Without Cervical JPS Training in Stroke Patients
- NCT number
- NCT07905703
- Status
- Active not recruiting
- Phases
- Not applicable
- Enrollment
- 50 participants, actual
- Lead sponsor
- University of Management and Technology Lahore
- Conditions
- Stroke
- Interventions
- vestibular rehabilitation With conventional PT, vestibular rehabilitation and cervical proprioception training with Conventional Pt
- First posted
- 2026-10-29
- Last updated
- 2026-11-03
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Registered outcomes4
Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.
| List | Outcome | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Modified Clinical Test of Sensory Integration on Balance (mCTSIB) | at baseline and after 6 weeks | The assessment will be conducted under six sensory conditions by modifying visual inputs and support surfaces, such as standing with the eye open, eye closed, and on firm/foam surfaces. The duration for maintaining stability in each condition will be recorded. Difficulty in maintaining balance with the eye closed on a firm surface indicates increased visual dependence, while difficulty on a foam surface indicates loss of somatosensory input. Loss of balance on a foam surface indicates vestibular dysfunction and impaired sensory integration. The time for maintaining balance will be recorded with a maximum score of 30 seconds for each condition. Lower scores will indicate impaired sensory integration and balance deficits |
| Primary | Balance for Berg Balance scale (BBS) | at baseline and after 6 weeks | The Berg balance scale (BBS) will be used to evaluate balance and functional mobility in stroke patients. The scale consists of 14 functional tasks such as sitting, standing, reaching, turning, and transferring. Every task will be analyzed using a 5-point scale from 0 to 4, with the highest possible score of 56. Higher scores indicate balance improvement and reduced fall risk, while lower scores show balance impairment and decreased functional mobility. A score of 41-56 will indicate low fall risk , 21 to 40 indicates moderate fall risk, and 0-20 indicates higher fall risk. Quantitative measurement will be taken between pre and post-treatment scores to evaluate balance improvement after the intervention |
| Primary | Functional mobility by 10-Meter walk test | at baseline and after 6 weeks | The 10-Meter walk test (10MWT) is used to assess gait speed and functional mobility in stroke survivors. In this test, the participants walk a total distance of 10 meters at a normal speed, and the time taken to cover the central 6 meters is noted to exclude the effects of acceleration and deceleration. Gait velocity is measured in meters per second (m/s) by dividing distance by time. Greater values significantly enhanced functional mobility and gait speed, while smaller values indicate increased fall risk and reduced walking ability. The scores are analyzed quantitatively, and pre- and post-measurements are compared to assess changes in gait speed and functional recovery |
| Primary | CERVICAL JOINT POSITION ERROR (CJPE) | at baseline and after 6 weeks | The cervical joint position error (JPE)is used to measure cervical proprioception and joint position error in patients surviving with stroke. Head-mounted device is used. The patient is seated with a laser pointer fixed on the head and asked to return the head to neutral position while performing specific neck movement flexion, extension, rotation, or side flexion. The deviation from the original neutral position is measured in centimeters (cm)or degrees (˚) on a target grid. Each movement is usually performed three times, and the mean value of repositioning error is calculated. Calculation is done by using the formula CJPE= trial 1 + trial 2 + trial ÷ 3. A smaller error indicates better cervical proprioception and accurate joint position sense, while a larger error indicates impaired proprioceptive input. The pre- and post-intervention scores will be compared quantitatively to determine improvement in cervical joint position sense. |
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Outcomes0
Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.
None in this release.
Results by group0
Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.
None in this release.
Participant flow0
How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.
None in this release.
Adverse events0
Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.
None in this release.
Adverse event totals0
The totals the trial posted for each group.
None in this release.
Papers1
The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.
| PMID | Listed as |
|---|---|
| 36232038 | BACKGROUND |
Source PubMed
Grants0
The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.
None in this release.
Trial comparisons0
Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.
None in this release.
Tests0
The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.
None in this release.
Data dates
The day each source was copied for this release.
Sources 3
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
- ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
- NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
- ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
- NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)
ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.
For software
Read this trial from software.
The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.
GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT07905703
GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT07905703/registered