Trial · NCT07905872
Feasibility of Community Occupational Therapy for Dementia (COT-D)
NCT07905872, Not applicable, Not yet recruiting, University of Vic - Central University of Catalonia
3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0
Cite this record
ConductScience Library. Feasibility of Community Occupational Therapy for Dementia (COT-D). Trials, record NCT07905872. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT07905872
On this page
Trial
As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.
- Title
- Feasibility of Community Occupational Therapy for Dementia (COT-D)
- NCT number
- NCT07905872
- Status
- Not yet recruiting
- Phases
- Not applicable
- Enrollment
- 48 participants, estimated
- Lead sponsor
- University of Vic - Central University of Catalonia
- Conditions
- Dementia
- Interventions
- Community-Based Occupational Therapy Intervention
- First posted
- 2026-10-30
- Last updated
- 2026-11-09
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Registered outcomes9
Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.
| List | Outcome | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Recruitment and retention | From enrollment to completion of post-intervention assessments (approximately 8-10 weeks). | Recruitment will be assessed as the number and proportion of eligible participants who consent to participate in the study. Retention will be assessed as the number and proportion of participants who complete the intervention and post-intervention assessments. Furthermore, feasibility will be evaluated using the Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM), a 4-item measure rated on a 5-point scale from 1 (completely disagree) to 5 (completely agree). The score is the mean of the four items and ranges from 1 to 5, with higher scores indicating greater perceived feasibility. |
| Primary | Adherence | Throughout the intervention period (approximately 8-10 weeks). | Intervention adherence will be assessed by participant attendance and completion of the intervention components delivered according to the study protocol. |
| Primary | Acceptability | Post-intervention (approximately 8-10 weeks). | Intervention acceptability will be evaluated among participants and caregivers following completion of the intervention using qualitative feedback regarding their experiences with the intervention and study procedures, including perceived benefits, barriers to participation, and suggestions for improvement. Furthermore, acceptability will be evaluated using the Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM), a 4-item measure rated on a 5-point scale from 1 (completely disagree) to 5 (completely agree). The score is the mean of the four items and ranges from 1 to 5, with higher scores indicating greater perceived acceptability. |
| Primary | Protocol Implementation | Throughout the intervention period (approximately 8-10 weeks). | The implementation of the intervention protocol will be assessed by documenting the successful delivery of the planned intervention components and recording any deviations from the study protocol throughout the study period. |
| Secondary | Meaningful Participation (Engagement in Meaningful Activities Survey) | Baseline, post-intervention (approximately 8-10 weeks), and one-month follow-up. | Meaningful participation will be assessed using the Engagement in Meaningful Activities Survey (EMAS). The EMAS evaluates the extent to which individuals perceive their daily activities as meaningful, personally valued, and consistent with their sense of competence, identity, and purpose in everyday life. The EMAS consists of 12 items rated on a 5-point scale from 1 (never) to 5 (always). The total score ranges from 12 to 60, with higher scores indicating greater engagement in meaningful activities. |
| Secondary | Occupational Performance (Canadian Occupational Performance Measure) | Baseline, post-intervention (approximately 8-10 weeks), and one-month follow-up. | Occupational performance will be assessed using the performance score of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM). The COPM is a person-centered and occupation-based measure that evaluates participants' perceived performance in individually identified meaningful occupations. Performance is rated from 1 (not able to do it at all) to 10 (able to do it extremely well) for each identified occupational problem, and the score is the mean across problems, with higher scores indicating better perceived performance. |
| Secondary | Satisfaction With Occupational Performance (Canadian Occupational Performance Measure) | Baseline, post-intervention (approximately 8-10 weeks), and one-month follow-up. | Satisfaction with occupational performance will be assessed using the satisfaction score of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM). The COPM evaluates participants' satisfaction with their performance in individually identified meaningful occupations. Satisfaction is rated from 1 (not satisfied at all) to 10 (extremely satisfied) for each identified problem, and the score is the mean across problems, with higher scores indicating greater satisfaction. |
| Secondary | Caregiver's Sense of Competence (Short Sense of Competence Questionnaire) | Baseline, post-intervention (approximately 8-10 weeks), and one-month follow-up. | Caregiver's sense of competence will be assessed using the Short Sense of Competence Questionnaire (S-SCQ). The S-SCQ is a 7-item questionnaire that evaluates caregivers' perceived competence in dealing with the burden of caregiving for a person with dementia. Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert-type scale from 1 (completely agree) to 5 (completely disagree). The total score ranges from 7 to 35, with higher scores indicating a greater sense of competence. |
| Secondary | Caregiver-rated Functional Dependence and Caregiver Upset | Baseline, post-intervention (approximately 8-10 weeks), and one-month follow-up. | Caregiver-rated functional dependence of the person with dementia and caregiver upset will be assessed using the Caregiver Assessment of Function and Upset (CAFU), a 15-item measure covering 8 instrumental and 7 basic activities of daily living. For each activity, the caregiver rates the level of assistance needed on a 7-point scale, which is reverse-coded for analysis so that 1 indicates complete independence and 7 indicates total assistance. Mean dependence scores are calculated separately for instrumental and basic activities (range 1 to 7), with higher scores indicating greater dependence. For each activity in which assistance is provided, the caregiver rates their upset from 0 (not at all) to 4 (extremely). Total upset scores range from 0 to 32 for instrumental activities and from 0 to 28 for basic activities, with higher scores indicating greater upset. |
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Outcomes0
Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.
None in this release.
Results by group0
Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.
None in this release.
Participant flow0
How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.
None in this release.
Adverse events0
Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.
None in this release.
Adverse event totals0
The totals the trial posted for each group.
None in this release.
Papers5
The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.
Grants0
The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.
None in this release.
Trial comparisons0
Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.
None in this release.
Tests0
The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.
None in this release.
Data dates
The day each source was copied for this release.
Sources 3
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
- ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
- NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
- ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
- NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)
ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.
For software
Read this trial from software.
The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.
GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT07905872
GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT07905872/registered