ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT07908615

Registered outcomes13

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryIncremental cost-utility ratio of outpatient hysteroscopic morcellation/aspiration versus operating-room resectoscopySix months after inclusion
Cost-utility analysis comparing the two care pathways from a collective perspective. Costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) derived from EQ-5D-5L measurements will be compared between groups. The incremental cost-utility ratio will be expressed as cost per QALY and results will also be presented as incremental net monetary benefit at different willingness-to-pay thresholds.
SecondaryFive-year budget impact of national adoption of outpatient hysteroscopic morcellation/aspirationFive-year time horizon
Estimated financial impact for the French National Health Insurance system under scenarios of national adoption of outpatient hysteroscopic morcellation/aspiration instead of operating-room resectoscopy.
SecondaryCompleteness of the operative hysteroscopy procedureAt the end of the procedurePresence of a residual lesion identified by the surgeon at the end of the procedure.
SecondaryDuration of the operative hysteroscopy procedureDuring the procedureTime in minutes from insertion of the hysteroscope into the cervical canal to completion of the operative procedure, marked by the final removal of the hysteroscope.
SecondaryIntraoperative complicationsDuring the operative procedureOccurrence of complications including uterine perforation, procedure interruption for any reason, conversion to another technique, or other procedure-related complications specified in the protocol.
SecondaryPain intensity and analgesic useDuring and at the end of the procedure, immediately after surgery, and at Day 7 after the interventionPain assessed using a numerical rating scale and additional analgesic use. For the resectoscope group, immediate postoperative pain is assessed 30 minutes after awakening, with a ±30-minute window.
SecondaryChange in symptoms and disease-specific quality of lifeAt inclusion; Day 7, Month 1 and Month 12 after intervention; and Months 3 and 6 after inclusionSymptoms assessed using the Higham score and disease-specific quality of life assessed using the UFS-QoL questionnaire, at the time points specified in the protocol.
SecondaryHealth-related quality of life measured using EQ-5D-5LAt inclusion and at Months 3 and 6 after inclusionHealth-related quality of life measured using the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire to estimate QALYs for the cost-utility analysis.
SecondaryNeed for further treatment or repeat interventionAt Months 1 and 12 after intervention, and Months 3 and 6 after inclusionProportion of participants requiring further treatment or repeat intervention at the time points specified in the protocol.
SecondaryTime to treatment, hospital length of stay and healthcare resource useFrom inclusion through the follow-up period, as applicableTime from inclusion to intervention, hospital length of stay, healthcare consumption and analgesic use after the procedure.
SecondaryPatient satisfaction with the procedure and care pathwayOn the day of the procedure and at Day 7 after interventionSatisfaction assessed on a 0-10 scale, including satisfaction with time to treatment, anesthesia, care pathway, procedure and pain management, and willingness to recommend the care pathway.
SecondaryPractitioner satisfaction with the procedure and care pathwayOn the day of the procedurePractitioner satisfaction assessed on a 0-10 scale, including satisfaction with time to treatment, anesthesia, care pathway, procedure and pain management.
SecondaryAcceptability of study participationDuring recruitmentNumber of women meeting eligibility criteria who decline participation and reasons for refusal

Source ClinicalTrials.govtrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this list from software.

Twenty rows a page, as JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT07908615/registered