ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT07909473

Registered outcomes17

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryIntervention AcceptabilityAt completion of study (6 weeks)
We assessed acceptability using the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability (TFA) Questionnaire. 7 TFA constructs are assessed, along with general acceptability items scores. Total score max = 35, with higher scores indicating higher acceptability of healthcare intervention.
PrimaryFeasibility of EnrollmentDuration of recruitment period, up to approximately 16 monthswe will calculate the proportion of people who were approached for study participation and enrolled
PrimaryFeasibility of Data Collection/RetentionFrom enrollment to completion of study at 6 weeksWe will calculate the percentage of participants who completed the surveys at each data collection time point (baseline, 3 weeks, 6 weeks) compared to those that did not.
PrimaryIntervention FidelityDuration of recruitment period, up to approximately 16 monthsReported as the proportion (%) of acupuncture sessions attended (out of 10).
PrimaryIntervention Acceptability Qualitative InterviewsAt completion of study (6 weeks)
Interviews were conducted on a subset of participants and included questions assessing participant experiences with the intervention, perceived effectiveness of the intervention, and overall acceptability of the intervention. All interviews were transcribed verbatim, and the transcripts served as the data source.
SecondaryPain ImpactBaseline, 3 weeks, 6 week data collection timepoints
PEG Scale Assessing Pain Intensity and Interference (Pain, Enjoyment, General Activity). Score is calculated by adding the scores of its three questions and dividing the total by three to get an average score from 0 to 10.
SecondaryPain LocationBaseline, 3 weeks, 6 weeksPain location (selected on body image); location \& number of pain locations summarized based on participant selection on body map image.
SecondaryNeuropathic PainBaseline & 6 weeks data collection timepointsPROMIS Neuropathic Pain Quality. T-score generated, with scores ≥ 50 suggesting a likely or prominent neuropathic pain quality phenotype
SecondaryNociceptive PainBaseline and 6-week data collection timepointPROMIS Nociceptive Pain questionnaire. T-score generate, with a score \>50 suggesting nociceptive pain involvement.
SecondaryPain Self-EfficacyBaseline & 6 week data collection timepointPain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire. Scored by adding the numerical ratings of all 10 items, resulting in a total score from 0 to 60. Higher scores indicate greater pain self-efficacy.
SecondaryPain ConcernsBaseline & 6-week data collection timepointUW Concerns About Pain 2-item short-form questionnaire. T-score generated, with higher T-score representing higher levels of pain catastrophizing.
SecondaryAnxietyBaseline, 3-week, and 6-week data collection timepoint.PROMIS Anxiety Short Form (4-item). Scoring using T-score, with higher scores indicating higher levels of symptoms.
SecondaryDepressive SymptomsBaseline, 3-week, and 6-week data collection timepointsPROMIS Depressive Symptoms Short Form (4-item). Scoring using T-score, with higher scores indicating higher levels/burden of symptoms.
SecondarySleep DisturbancesBaseline, 3-week, and 6-week data collection timepointPROMIS SLeep Disturbances Short-Form (4-item). Scoring using T-score, with higher scores indicating higher severity of sleep disturbance.
SecondaryFatigueBaseline, 3-week, and 6-week data collection timepoint.PROMIS Fatigue Short Form (4-item). Scoring using T-score, with higher scores indicating higher levels/burden of fatigue.
SecondaryGlobal Physical HealthBaseline, 3-week, & 6-week data collection timepoints.PROMIS Global Health - Physical 2-item form. Scoring using T-score, with higher scores indicating better physical health.
SecondaryCurrent Pain Medication UseBaseline, 3-week, & 6-week data collection timepointAssesses if participant is taking medications for pain. If so, questions around the frequency and type of pain medicines an individual is taking.

Source ClinicalTrials.govtrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this list from software.

Twenty rows a page, as JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT07909473/registered