ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT07909746

VectorCAM: A Digital Innovation to Advance Entomological Surveillance

NCT07909746, Not applicable, Completed, Johns Hopkins University

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. VectorCAM: A Digital Innovation to Advance Entomological Surveillance. Trials, record NCT07909746. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT07909746

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
VectorCAM: A Digital Innovation to Advance Entomological Surveillance
NCT number
NCT07909746
Status
Completed
Phases
Not applicable
Enrollment
48 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Johns Hopkins University
Conditions
Malaria, Surveillance, Entomology, Vector-Borne Diseases
Interventions
VectorCam, Routine Entomological Surveillance
First posted
2026-11-02
Last updated
2026-11-02

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes7

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryMosquito Species Identification AccuracyFrom the beginning of the steady stage (6 months) up to 12 months
Accuracy of mosquito species classification by VectorCam compared to molecular or sequencing results. For each taxonomic class, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and overall accuracy were calculated. A weighted F1 score accounting for class imbalance across taxa was additionally reported to provide an aggregate performance measure across species groups.
PrimaryThroughput Efficiency (Per-specimen identification time )From the beginning of the steady stage (6 months) up to 12 monthsOperational throughput was defined as the time required to progress from identification of one mosquito specimen to identification of the subsequent specimen under routine operating conditions.
PrimaryCompleteness (proportion of required surveillance reporting fields successfully captured and available)From the beginning of the steady stage (6 months) up to 12 months
Data completeness was defined as the proportion of required surveillance reporting fields that were successfully captured and available for review within each arm's reporting system. For each routine surveillance data element captured on the paper-based VHT forms and subsequently entered into DHIS2, the corresponding field, if any, collected by the VectorCam application was identified, and vice versa. Data elements that existed in only one system, or that could not be mapped to an equivalent field in the other, were excluded from the completeness comparison; only fields common to both arms were retained.
PrimaryTimeliness (delay between field specimen collection and availability of surveillance data)From the beginning of the steady stage (6 months) up to 12 months
Timeliness was defined as the elapsed time between surveillance activity and availability of the resulting record in the arm-specific digital reporting system. In the control arm, reporting delay was calculated as the number of days between the field collection date recorded by the VHT and the date on which the corresponding surveillance record became available in Uganda's DHIS2 system. In the study arm, reporting delay was calculated from initiation of the VectorCam imaging session to successful upload of the corresponding record to the secure VectorCam cloud server.
SecondaryClassification performance accuracy for mosquito sexFrom the beginning of the steady stage (6 months) up to 12 months
In the VectorCam (study) arm, classification of sex will be compared against morphological identification by trained VCOs under light microscopy for a subset of specimens. Performance will be measured as accuracy: the proportion of specimens correctly classified. For sex, accuracy will be reported overall and separately for females and males.
SecondaryClassification performance accuracy for mosquito abdominal statusFrom the beginning of the steady stage (6 months) up to 12 months
In the VectorCam (study) arm, classification of abdominal status will be compared against morphological identification by trained VCOs under light microscopy for a subset of specimens. Performance will be measured as accuracy: the proportion of specimens correctly classified.. Abdominal status, will be reported overall and for each category (unfed, fed, and gravid).
SecondarySummative Usability Assessment (SUS Scale)12 months
The SUS questionnaire was administered to all participating VHTs assigned to the intervention arm. Responses were scored according to standard SUS methodology, generating a total usability score ranging from 0 to 100. Results were analyzed descriptively to characterize perceived usability and acceptability. A System Usability Scale (SUS) score is considered good when it is above 68, with scores above 80.3 considered excellent or top-tier.

Outcomes0

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

None in this release.

Results by group0

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

None in this release.

Participant flow0

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

None in this release.

Adverse events0

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

None in this release.

Adverse event totals0

The totals the trial posted for each group.

None in this release.

Papers8

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
17607465BACKGROUNDPubMed
21250345BACKGROUNDPubMed
23478581BACKGROUNDPubMed
23555987BACKGROUNDPubMed
29851600BACKGROUNDPubMed
31801543BACKGROUNDPubMed
32747744BACKGROUNDPubMed
35808427BACKGROUNDPubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT07909746

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT07909746/registered