Trial · NCT07911371
Comparison of 3D-Printed and Heat-Cured Upper Complete Denture Bases
NCT07911371, Not applicable, Completed, Arab International University
3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0
Cite this record
ConductScience Library. Comparison of 3D-Printed and Heat-Cured Upper Complete Denture Bases. Trials, record NCT07911371. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT07911371
On this page
Trial
As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.
- Title
- Comparison of 3D-Printed and Heat-Cured Upper Complete Denture Bases
- NCT number
- NCT07911371
- Status
- Completed
- Phases
- Not applicable
- Enrollment
- 16 participants, actual
- Lead sponsor
- Arab International University
- Conditions
- Complete Edentulism
- Interventions
- Heat-Polymerised Maxillary Complete Denture Base, 3D-Printed Maxillary Complete Denture Base
- First posted
- 2026-11-02
- Last updated
- 2026-11-02
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Registered outcomes6
Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.
| List | Outcome | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Anterior Retention of the Maxillary Denture Base | At the clinical assessment of each denture base, following 30 seconds of intraoral seating. | Anterior retention was independently rated by two masked examiners on a four-point scale: 1 = no retention with spontaneous displacement; 2 = poor retention with minimal resistance to dislodgement; 3 = moderate retention; and 4 = good retention with maximal resistance to dislodgement. Higher scores indicated better retention. The mean of both examiners' scores was used for comparison between fabrication techniques. |
| Primary | Posterior Retention of the Maxillary Denture Base | At the clinical assessment of each denture base, following 30 seconds of intraoral seating. | Posterior retention was independently rated by two masked examiners on a four-point scale: 1 = no retention with spontaneous displacement; 2 = poor retention with minimal resistance to dislodgement; 3 = moderate retention; and 4 = good retention with maximal resistance to dislodgement. Higher scores indicated better retention. The mean of both examiners' scores was used for comparison between fabrication techniques. |
| Secondary | Anteroposterior Stability of the Maxillary Denture Base | At the clinical assessment of each denture base, following 30 seconds of intraoral seating. | Two masked examiners independently assessed anteroposterior stability using a four-point scale: 1 = displacement under light force; 2 = displacement under moderate force; 3 = displacement only under strong force; and 4 = stability maintained under strong force. Higher scores indicated better stability. The mean of the two examiners' ratings was used for comparison. |
| Secondary | Lateral Stability of the Maxillary Denture Base | At the clinical assessment of each denture base, following 30 seconds of intraoral seating. | Two masked examiners independently assessed lateral stability using a four-point scale: 1 = displacement under light force; 2 = displacement under moderate force; 3 = displacement only under strong force; and 4 = stability maintained under strong force. Higher scores indicated better stability. The mean of the two examiners' ratings was used for comparison. |
| Secondary | Anteroposterior Support of the Maxillary Denture Base | At the clinical assessment of each denture base, following 30 seconds of intraoral seating. | Two masked examiners independently assessed anteroposterior support under pressure directed towards the supporting tissues. A three-point scale was used: 1 = pronounced rocking; 2 = moderate rocking; and 3 = no or minimal rocking. Higher scores indicated better support. The mean of the two examiners' ratings was used for comparison. |
| Secondary | Lateral Support of the Maxillary Denture Base | At the clinical assessment of each denture base, following 30 seconds of intraoral seating. | Two masked examiners independently assessed lateral support under pressure directed towards the supporting tissues. A three-point scale was used: 1 = pronounced rocking; 2 = moderate rocking; and 3 = no or minimal rocking. Higher scores indicated better support. The mean of the two examiners' ratings was used for comparison. |
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Outcomes0
Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.
None in this release.
Results by group0
Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.
None in this release.
Participant flow0
How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.
None in this release.
Adverse events0
Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.
None in this release.
Adverse event totals0
The totals the trial posted for each group.
None in this release.
Papers5
The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.
Grants0
The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.
None in this release.
Trial comparisons0
Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.
None in this release.
Tests0
The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.
None in this release.
Data dates
The day each source was copied for this release.
Sources 3
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
- ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
- NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
- ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
- NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)
ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.
For software
Read this trial from software.
The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.
GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT07911371
GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT07911371/registered