Trial · NCT07912580
Acute Effects of Shoulder Dynamic Taping in Competitive Volleyball Players
NCT07912580, Not applicable, Completed, Balikesir University
3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.4.0
Cite this record
ConductScience Library. Acute Effects of Shoulder Dynamic Taping in Competitive Volleyball Players. Trials, record NCT07912580. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.4.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT07912580
On this page
Trial
As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.
- Title
- Acute Effects of Shoulder Dynamic Taping in Competitive Volleyball Players
- NCT number
- NCT07912580
- Status
- Completed
- Phases
- Not applicable
- Enrollment
- 30 participants, actual
- Lead sponsor
- Balikesir University
- Conditions
- Athletic Performance, Shoulder Muscle Strength, Taping
- Interventions
- Dynamic shoulder taping, Sham shoulder taping
- First posted
- 2026-11-03
- Last updated
- 2026-11-03
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Registered outcomes5
Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.
| List | Outcome | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Serve Velocity | During a single assessment session, in randomized order: (1) untaped assessment, either before tape application or 45 minutes after tape removal following a washout period; and (2) taped assessment, 45 minutes after tape application. | Serve velocity was measured using a handheld radar gun (Bushnell Speed Radar Gun, Model 101911). Participants performed three successful maximal-effort serves under both taped and untaped conditions. The mean velocity of the three successful serves was calculated for each condition. Serve velocity was recorded in kilometers per hour (km/h). |
| Secondary | Isometric Shoulder Internal Rotation Strength | During a single assessment session, in randomized order: (1) untaped assessment, either before tape application or 45 minutes after tape removal following a washout period; and (2) taped assessment, 45 minutes after tape application. | Isometric shoulder internal rotation strength was measured on the dominant arm using a MicroFET2 handheld dynamometer. Participants were positioned prone with the shoulder abducted to 90° and elbow flexed to 90°. Three maximal isometric contractions were performed using the break-test method, with 1-minute rest intervals. The mean peak force of the three trials was recorded in kilograms-force (kgf). Higher values indicate greater muscle strength. |
| Secondary | Isometric Shoulder External Rotation Strength | During a single assessment session, in randomized order: (1) untaped assessment, either before tape application or 45 minutes after tape removal following a washout period; and (2) taped assessment, 45 minutes after tape application. | Isometric shoulder external rotation strength was measured on the dominant arm using a MicroFET2 handheld dynamometer. Participants were positioned prone with the shoulder abducted to 90° and elbow flexed to 90°. Three maximal isometric contractions were performed using the break-test method, with 1-minute rest intervals. The mean peak force of the three trials was recorded in kilograms-force (kgf). Higher values indicate greater muscle strength. |
| Secondary | Functional Throwing Performance Index (FTPI) | During a single assessment session, in randomized order: (1) untaped assessment, either before tape application or 45 minutes after tape removal following a washout period; and (2) taped assessment, 45 minutes after tape application. | Functional throwing performance was assessed using the Functional Throwing Performance Index (FTPI). Participants repeatedly threw a ball at a 30 × 30 cm target positioned 120 cm above the floor from a distance of 4.5 m for 30 seconds. FTPI was calculated as the percentage of successful throws relative to the total number of throws. Three trials were performed with 1-minute rest intervals, and the mean FTPI percentage was used for analysis. Higher scores indicate greater throwing accuracy. |
| Secondary | Athlete Satisfaction With Taping | Once, immediately after completion of all performance assessments (Day 1). | Athlete satisfaction with the assigned taping intervention was assessed once after completion of all performance assessments. Participants rated their overall satisfaction specifically with the taped condition using a study-specific, single-item, 11-point numerical rating scale ranging from 0 (not satisfied at all) to 10 (completely satisfied). Higher scores indicate greater satisfaction with the taping intervention. |
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Outcomes0
Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.
None in this release.
Results by group0
Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.
None in this release.
Participant flow0
How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.
None in this release.
Adverse events0
Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.
None in this release.
Adverse event totals0
The totals the trial posted for each group.
None in this release.
Papers1
The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.
| PMID | Listed as |
|---|---|
| 39180114 | RESULT |
Source PubMed
Grants0
The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.
None in this release.
Trial comparisons0
Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.
None in this release.
Tests0
The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.
None in this release.
Source
- Release
- trials-2026-11-12-0.4.0
- Release manifest SHA-256
- 0f4a8d8c48aee2a7573ae0fa94ecbeab70c1adbe449bbc95c424bc7d3e97b9d4
- Registry capture
- 2026-11-12
- Results copy, AACT
- 2026-03-23
- NIH clinical studies file
- 2026-11-13
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Sources 3
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
- ClinicalTrials.govNone stated
- NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
- ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
- NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)
ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.
For software
Read this trial from software.
The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.
GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT07912580
GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT07912580/registered