Trial · NCT07914036
Patient Satisfaction After Robotic-Assisted Versus Conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT07914036, Not applicable, Not yet recruiting, Ain Shams University
3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.4.0
Cite this record
ConductScience Library. Patient Satisfaction After Robotic-Assisted Versus Conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty. Trials, record NCT07914036. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.4.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT07914036
On this page
Trial
As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.
- Title
- Patient Satisfaction After Robotic-Assisted Versus Conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty
- NCT number
- NCT07914036
- Status
- Not yet recruiting
- Phases
- Not applicable
- Enrollment
- 70 participants, estimated
- Lead sponsor
- Ain Shams University
- Conditions
- Osteoarthritis (Knee), Robotic Assisted Arthroplasty
- Interventions
- Mako4 Robotic Arm Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty, conventional total knee arthroplasty using Triathlon Total Knee System
- First posted
- 2026-11-03
- Last updated
- 2026-11-03
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Registered outcomes23
Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.
| List | Outcome | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | patient satisfaction (Forgotten Joint Score-12 (FJS-12)) | 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months postoperatively | Patient-reported joint awareness assessed using the 12-item Forgotten Joint Score (FJS-12). The score ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating less awareness of the operated knee during daily activities and therefore a better outcome. |
| Primary | Patient Satisfaction (2011 Knee Society Score [KSS] Satisfaction Domain) | 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months postoperatively | Patient satisfaction will be assessed using the satisfaction domain of the 2011 Knee Society Score. Scores range from 0 to 40, with higher scores indicating greater patient satisfaction and therefore a better outcome. |
| Secondary | Functional outcome: (2011 Knee Society Score [KSS] Symptoms Domain) | 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months postoperatively | Symptoms will be assessed using the symptoms domain of the 2011 Knee Society Score (KSS). Scores range from 0 to 25, with higher scores indicating fewer symptoms and a better outcome. |
| Secondary | Functional outcome: (2011 Knee Society Score [KSS] Functional Activity Domain) | 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months postoperatively | Functional activity will be assessed using the functional activity domain of the 2011 Knee Society Score (KSS). Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better functional ability. |
| Secondary | Functional outcome: (2011 Knee Society Score [KSS] Expectations Domain) | 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months postoperatively | Patient expectations will be assessed using the expectations domain of the 2011 Knee Society Score (KSS). Scores range from 0 to 15, with higher scores indicating greater fulfillment of patient expectations. |
| Secondary | Functional outcome: (2011 Knee Society Score [KSS] objective knee indicators domain ) | 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months postoperatively | Objective knee status will be assessed using the Objective Knee Score of the 2011 Knee Society Score (KSS), which evaluates symptoms, range of motion, knee stability, and alignment. Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better objective knee status. |
| Secondary | Functional Outcome: (Oxford Knee Score [OKS]) | 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months postoperatively | Functional outcome will be assessed using the Oxford Knee Score (OKS), a 12-item patient-reported measure evaluating knee pain and function. Scores range from 0 to 48, with higher scores indicating better knee function and less pain. |
| Secondary | Radiological accuracy: Hip-Knee-Ankle angle (HKA) | 6 weeks postoperatively | Coronal lower-limb alignment will be assessed on standing full-length lower-limb radiographs using the hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle, measured in degrees. The HKA angle will be determined from the mechanical axes of the femur and tibia. Deviation from the prespecified alignment target will also be recorded. An alignment outlier will be defined according to the prespecified study threshold, including deviation greater than 3 degrees from the intended alignment target where applicable. |
| Secondary | Radiological accuracy: Knee Society Radiographic Evaluation System (KSRES) | immediate postoperative , 6 months and and 12 months postoperatively | Postoperative radiographs will be obtained (Xray knees Ap, lateral and if applicable; merchant view) and will be assessed using the Knee Society Radiographic Evaluation System, which provides a standardized assessment of total knee arthroplasty component alignment and fixation. Radiolucent lines and osteolysis will be recorded according to predefined femoral and tibial component zones, and component position will be assessed in the coronal and sagittal planes. |
| Secondary | Femoral Component Rotational Alignment | immediate postoperative | Femoral component rotational alignment will be assessed using postoperative computed tomography (CT). Rotation will be measured in degrees relative to the predefined femoral anatomical reference axis. The magnitude and direction of rotational deviation will be recorded. |
1 to 10 of 23Source ClinicalTrials.gov
See all 23 registered outcomesOutcomes0
Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.
None in this release.
Results by group0
Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.
None in this release.
Participant flow0
How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.
None in this release.
Adverse events0
Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.
None in this release.
Adverse event totals0
The totals the trial posted for each group.
None in this release.
Papers14
The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.
Grants0
The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.
None in this release.
Trial comparisons0
Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.
None in this release.
Tests0
The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.
None in this release.
Data dates
The day each source was copied for this release.
Sources 3
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
- ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
- NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
- ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
- NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)
ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.
For software
Read this trial from software.
The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.
GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT07914036
GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT07914036/registered?page=2