ConductScience.org, home

Library / Trials

Evaluation of Scanning and Diagnostic Performance of an Autonomous Dual-Arm Breast Ultrasound Robot

NCT07915050, Recruiting, Huazhong University of Science and Technology

Trial 9

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

FieldValueSource
TitleEvaluation of Scanning and Diagnostic Performance of an Autonomous Dual-Arm Breast Ultrasound RobotClinicalTrials.gov
NCT numberNCT07915050ClinicalTrials.gov
StatusRecruitingClinicalTrials.gov
Enrollment885 participants, estimatedClinicalTrials.gov
Lead sponsorHuazhong University of Science and TechnologyClinicalTrials.gov
ConditionsBreast DiseasesClinicalTrials.gov
InterventionsAutonomous Dual-Arm Robotic Breast UltrasoundClinicalTrials.gov
First posted2026-11-04ClinicalTrials.gov
Last updated2026-11-12ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes 19

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescriptionSource
PrimaryAgreement Between Expert BI-RADS Classifications Based on Robotic and Handheld Breast Ultrasound Images6 weeks after completion of image collection for all participantsClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryProportion of Examinations With Complete Breast Coverage Assessed by Expert Review of Ultrasound Recordings6 weeks after completion of image collection for all participants
Breast scanning completeness will be assessed through expert review of the complete ultrasound recordings obtained using robotic and handheld ultrasound. Each examination will be classified as complete or incomplete (Yes/No) according to whether the predefined breast scanning regions are adequately covered. The outcome will be reported as the percentage of complete examinations for each modality.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryOverall Breast Ultrasound Image Quality Assessed Using a 5-Point Expert Rating Scale6 weeks after completion of image collection for all participants
Overall image quality will be evaluated by experienced breast ultrasound experts using a 5-point ordinal rating scale (1 = poorest quality; 5 = best quality) based on the complete ultrasound recordings acquired using each modality.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryLesion-Level Detection Sensitivity6 weeks after completion of image collection for all participantsClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryMean Number of False-Positive Lesion Detections per Breast Ultrasound Examination6 weeks after completion of image collection for all participantsClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryLesion Detection Precision6 weeks after completion of image collection for all participantsClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryProportion of Breast Lesions With Accurate Localization Based on Expert Reference Assessment6 weeks after completion of image collection for all participantsClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryAgreement in Lesion Diameter Measurements6 weeks after completion of image collection for all participantsClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryAgreement Between Robotic and Handheld Ultrasound in Sonographic Features (Shape, Orientation, Margin, Echogenicity, and Posterior Acoustic Features) of Breast Lesions6 weeks after completion of image collection for all participantsClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryPatient-Reported Overall Satisfaction Score Using a 5-Point Questionnaire6 weeks after completion of image collection for all participantsResponses will be coded on a 5-point ordinal scale: 1 = very dissatisfied, 2 = dissatisfied, 3 = neutral, 4 = satisfied, and 5 = very satisfied. Higher scores indicate greater satisfaction.ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryPatient-Reported Pain Score Assessed Using a Study-Specific 5-Point Scale6 weeks after completion of image collection for all participantsEach item will be coded on a 5-point ordinal scale, ranging from 1 (none) to 5 (very pronounced). Higher scores indicate greater perceived pressure, pain, or anxiety.ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryPatient-Reported Anxiety Score Assessed Using a Study-Specific 5-Point Scale6 weeks after completion of image collection for all participantsEach item will be coded on a 5-point ordinal scale, ranging from 1 (none) to 5 (very pronounced). Higher scores indicate greater perceived pressure, pain, or anxiety.ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryPatient-Reported Probe Pressure Score Assessed Using a Study-Specific 5-Point Scale6 weeks after completion of image collection for all participantsEach item will be coded on a 5-point ordinal scale, ranging from 1 (none) to 5 (very pronounced). Higher scores indicate greater perceived pressure, pain, or anxiety.ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryPatient-Level Sensitivity for Breast Cancer Detection6 weeks after completion of image collection for all participantsClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryPatient-Level Specificity for Breast Cancer Detection6 weeks after completion of image collection for all participantsClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryArea Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (AUC) for Patient-Level Breast Cancer Detection6 weeks after completion of image collection for all participantsClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryChange in Patient-Level Sensitivity With Versus Without AI Assistance (Percentage Points)6 weeks after completion of image collection for all participantsClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryChange in Patient-Level Specificity With Versus Without AI Assistance (Percentage Points)6 weeks after completion of image collection for all participantsClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryChange in Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (AUC) With Versus Without AI Assistance6 weeks after completion of image collection for all participantsClinicalTrials.gov

Outcomes 0

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured asSource

Results by group 0

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnitsSource

Participant flow 0

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits countedSource

Adverse events 0

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEventsSource

Adverse event totals 0

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt riskSource

Papers 0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource

Grants 0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

ProjectTitlePrincipal investigatorsOrganizationFunderFiscal yearsSource

Trial comparisons 0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource

Tests 0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

TestNamed asSource

Source 5

FieldValueSource
Releasetrials-2026-11-12-0.4.0ClinicalTrials.gov
Release manifest SHA-2560f4a8d8c48aee2a7573ae0fa94ecbeab70c1adbe449bbc95c424bc7d3e97b9d4ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry capture2026-11-12ClinicalTrials.gov
Results copy, AACT2026-03-23ClinicalTrials.gov
NIH clinical studies file2026-11-13ClinicalTrials.gov

The same record as JSON

Release trials-2026-11-12-0.4.0

ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACT: ClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299 ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

ClinicalTrials.gov: none stated ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project files: Public domain (NIH RePORTER)